The Three Laws of Neurorobotics: A Review on What Neurorehabilitation Robots Should Do for Patients and Clinicians

Most studies and reviews on robots for neurorehabilitation focus on their effectiveness. These studies often report inconsistent results. This and many other reasons limit the credit given to these robots by therapists and patients. Further, neurorehabilitation is often still based on therapists’ expertise, with competition among different schools of thought, generating substantial uncertainty about what exactly a neurorehabilitation robot should do. Little attention has been given to ethics. This review adopts a new approach, inspired by Asimov’s three laws of robotics and based on the most recent studies in neurorobotics, for proposing new guidelines for designing and using robots for neurorehabilitation. We propose three laws of neurorobotics based on the ethical need for safe and effective robots, the redefinition of their role as therapist helpers, and the need for clear and transparent human–machine interfaces. These laws may allow engineers and clinicians to work closely together on a new generation of neurorobots.

[1]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  T. Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  J. Konczak,et al.  Robot-Aided Assessment of Wrist Proprioception , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[5]  Jürgen Wahrburg,et al.  The past, present and future of minimally invasive spine surgery: A review and speculative outlook , 2013, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[6]  Cordula Werner,et al.  Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  Meigen Liu,et al.  Clinical usefulness and validity of robotic measures of reaching movement in hemiparetic stroke patients , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  K. Harding I, Robot , 2017, Practical Neurology.

[9]  A. Wing,et al.  A new challenge--robotics in the rehabilitation of the neurologically motor impaired. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[10]  N. Hogan,et al.  The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[11]  Guglielmo Tamburrini,et al.  Ethical reflections on health care robotics , 2009 .

[12]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  Ángel Gil-Agudo,et al.  Hybrid FES-robot cooperative control of ambulatory gait rehabilitation exoskeleton , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  Stefan Hesse,et al.  Effect on arm function and cost of robot-assisted group therapy in subacute patients with stroke and a moderately to severely affected arm: a randomized controlled trial , 2014, Clinical rehabilitation.

[15]  V. Dietz,et al.  Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  J. Hidler,et al.  Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  C. Werner,et al.  Advances in Neuromotor Stroke Rehabilitation , 2014, BioMed research international.

[18]  S. Paolucci,et al.  Seven Capital Devices for the Future of Stroke Rehabilitation , 2012, Stroke research and treatment.

[19]  G. Morone,et al.  Influence of Psychologic Features on Rehabilitation Outcomes in Patients with Subacute Stroke Trained with Robotic-Aided Walking Therapy , 2013, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[20]  Adam Roberts,et al.  The History of Science Fiction , 2005 .

[21]  S Hesse,et al.  Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS) , 2007, Clinical rehabilitation.

[22]  Patrizio Sale,et al.  Hand Robotics Rehabilitation: Feasibility and Preliminary Results of a Robotic Treatment in Patients with Hemiparesis , 2012, Stroke research and treatment.

[23]  Robert J Sawyer,et al.  Robot Ethics , 2007, Science.

[24]  Concepción A Monje,et al.  Usability assessment of ASIBOT: a portable robot to aid patients with spinal cord injury , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[25]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[26]  Giovanni Morone,et al.  Who May Have Durable Benefit From Robotic Gait Training?: A 2-Year Follow-Up Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients With Subacute Stroke , 2012, Stroke.

[27]  Bruce H Dobkin,et al.  An Accelerometry-Based Comparison of 2 Robotic Assistive Devices for Treadmill Training of Gait , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[28]  G. Morone,et al.  Who May Benefit From Robotic-Assisted Gait Training? , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[29]  JanMehrholz,et al.  Electromechanical-Assisted Training for Walking After Stroke , 2013 .

[30]  Xu Qian-qian,et al.  Study on Implementation Approach for Standard YY/T 0316(ISO 14971) "Medical Devices-Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices" , 2012 .

[31]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Robot-Assisted Therapy for Long-Term Upper-Limb Impairment After Stroke , 2011, Stroke.

[32]  Laehyun Kim,et al.  A rehabilitation device to improve the hand grasp function of stroke patients using a patient-driven approach , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[33]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  A. Spooren,et al.  Robot-assisted task-oriented upper extremity skill training in cervical spinal cord injury: a feasibility study , 2015, Spinal Cord.

[35]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  Why Effectiveness of Robot-Mediated Neurorehabilitation Does Not Necessarily Influence Its Adoption , 2014, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Bruce H Dobkin,et al.  Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[37]  T. Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[38]  Robert Riener,et al.  Robot-Assisted Arm Assessments in Spinal Cord Injured Patients: A Consideration of Concept Study , 2015, PloS one.

[39]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Optimizing Compliant, Model-Based Robotic Assistance to Promote Neurorehabilitation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[40]  H. van der Kooij,et al.  Design and Evaluation of the LOPES Exoskeleton Robot for Interactive Gait Rehabilitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[41]  F. Müller,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study , 2007, Stroke.

[42]  T. Hsia,et al.  A literature review: robots in medicine , 1991, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[43]  Ada T L Ng,et al.  Current status of robot-assisted surgery. , 2014, Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi.

[44]  S. Masiero,et al.  Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[45]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[46]  A. Ijspeert,et al.  From Swimming to Walking with a Salamander Robot Driven by a Spinal Cord Model , 2007, Science.

[47]  H. Ring,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for neuromuscular training of sub-acute stroke patients. A feasibility study. , 2008, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[48]  Ian D Cameron,et al.  Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[49]  J. Affeldt,et al.  The feasibility study , 2019, The Information System Consultant’s Handbook.

[50]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Rehabilitation and Health Care Robotics , 2016, Springer Handbook of Robotics, 2nd Ed..

[51]  Ming Xie Fundamentals of Robotics - Linking Perception to Action , 2003, Series in Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence.

[52]  G. Morone,et al.  The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation , 2014, Expert review of medical devices.

[53]  G. Morone,et al.  Driving electromechanically assisted Gait Trainer for people with stroke. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[54]  Patrizio Sale,et al.  Robot-aided therapy for upper limbs in patients with stroke-related lesions. Brief report of a clinical experience , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[55]  Volker Dietz,et al.  Comprar Neurorehabilitation Technology | Volker Dietz | 9781447122760 | Springer , 2012 .

[56]  G. Morone,et al.  Physiological responses and energy cost of walking on the Gait Trainer with and without body weight support in subacute stroke patients , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[57]  Valentina Squeri,et al.  Desirable features of a “humanoid” robot-therapist , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[58]  R. Tong,et al.  Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[59]  Jessica P McCabe,et al.  Feasibility of combining gait robot and multichannel functional electrical stimulation with intramuscular electrodes. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[60]  S. Hesse,et al.  Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control , 2003, Current opinion in neurology.

[61]  J. Hidler,et al.  Advances in the Understanding and Treatment of Stroke Impairment Using Robotic Devices , 2005, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[62]  Edoardo Datteri,et al.  Predicting the Long-Term Effects of Human-Robot Interaction: A Reflection on Responsibility in Medical Robotics , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[63]  M. Molinari,et al.  Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[64]  Brian M. Stableford Historical Dictionary of Science Fiction Literature , 2004 .

[65]  W S Harwin,et al.  An intelligent end-effector for a rehabilitation robot. , 1989, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[66]  Vicky Chan,et al.  Use of a robotic device to measure age-related decline in finger proprioception , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[67]  Giulio Rosati,et al.  Robotic Upper Limb Rehabilitation after Acute Stroke by NeReBot: Evaluation of Treatment Costs , 2014, BioMed research international.

[68]  Antoinette Domingo,et al.  Reliability and validity of using the Lokomat to assess lower limb joint position sense in people with incomplete spinal cord injury , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.