Identifying technological competition trends for R&D planning using dynamic patent maps: SAO-based content analysis

Patent maps showing competition trends in technological development can provide valuable input for decision support on research and development (R&D) strategies. By introducing semantic patent analysis with advantages in representing technological objectives and structures, this paper constructs dynamic patent maps to show technological competition trends and describes the strategic functions of the dynamic maps. The proposed maps are based on subject-action-object (SAO) structures that are syntactically ordered sentences extracted using the natural language processing of the patent text; the structures of a patent encode the key findings of the invention and expertise of its inventors. Therefore, this paper introduces a method of constructing dynamic patent maps using SAO-based content analysis of patents and presents several types of dynamic patent maps by combining patent bibliographic information and patent mapping and clustering techniques. Building on the maps, this paper provides further analyses to identify technological areas in which patents have not been granted (“patent vacuums”), areas in which many patents have actively appeared (“technological hot spots”), R&D overlap of technological competitors, and characteristics of patent clusters. The proposed analyses of dynamic patent maps are illustrated using patents related to the synthesis of carbon nanotubes. We expect that the proposed method will aid experts in understanding technological competition trends in the process of formulating R&D strategies.

[1]  Chao-Chan Wu,et al.  Using patent analyses to monitor the technological trends in an emerging field of technology: a case of carbon nanotube field emission display , 2009, Scientometrics.

[2]  Yiannis Kompatsiaris,et al.  Towards content-oriented patent document processing , 2008 .

[3]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[4]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[5]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend , 2004 .

[6]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  SAO network analysis of patents for technology trends identification: a case study of polymer electrolyte membrane technology in proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2011, Scientometrics.

[7]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Work and infrastructure , 1995, CACM.

[8]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach , 2009 .

[9]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Invention property-function network analysis of patents: a case of silicon-based thin film solar cells , 2011, Scientometrics.

[10]  Gaetano Cascini,et al.  Measuring patent similarity by comparing inventions functional trees , 2008, IFIP CAI.

[11]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Identifying rapidly evolving technological trends for R&D planning using SAO-based semantic patent networks , 2011, Scientometrics.

[12]  Semyon Savransky,et al.  Engineering of Creativity: Introduction to TRIZ Methodology of Inventive Problem Solving , 2000 .

[13]  Ronen Feldman,et al.  Book Reviews: The Text Mining Handbook: Advanced Approaches to Analyzing Unstructured Data by Ronen Feldman and James Sanger , 2008, CL.

[14]  Gerard Salton,et al.  A vector space model for automatic indexing , 1975, CACM.

[15]  Gaetano Cascini,et al.  Natural Language Processing of Patents and Technical Documentation , 2004, Document Analysis Systems.

[16]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation , 1998, Scientometrics.

[17]  Darrell Mann,et al.  Hands-on systematic innovation , 2002 .

[18]  Philip Resnik,et al.  Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy: An Information-Based Measure and its Application to Problems of Ambiguity in Natural Language , 1999, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[19]  Noriko Kando,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on patent processing , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[20]  Hae-Sang Park,et al.  A simple and fast algorithm for K-medoids clustering , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  J. Kruskal Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .

[22]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[23]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Detecting signals of new technological opportunities using semantic patent analysis and outlier detection , 2011, Scientometrics.

[24]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Identifying patent infringement using SAO based semantic technological similarities , 2011, Scientometrics.

[25]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Evaluation of technological strategies of companies by means of MDS maps , 2014 .

[26]  Sandra Müller,et al.  Patent-Based Inventor Profiles as a Basis for Human Resource Decisions in Research and Development , 2005 .

[27]  Hyunbo Cho,et al.  A novel method for measuring semantic similarity for XML schema matching , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Wipo PCT Yearly Review: The International Patent System, Developments and Performance in 2009 , 2008 .

[29]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[30]  Martin G. Moehrle,et al.  Evaluating the Risk of Patent Infringement by Means of Semantic Patent Analysis: The Case of DNA Chips , 2008 .

[31]  H. P. F. Peters,et al.  Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part I: Representations by direct multidimensional scaling , 1993 .

[32]  Yongtae Park,et al.  On the Development and Application of a Self-Organizing Feature Map-Based Patent Map , 2002 .

[33]  H. P. F. Peters,et al.  Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part II: Representations by combined clustering and multidimensional scaling , 1993 .