RETRACTED: Key factors of heuristic evaluation for game design: Towards massively multi-player online role-playing game

The computer game industry has become the fastest growing field of the entertainment industry. However, only a very small number of computer game products overcome the costs of production and generate earnings. According to traditional marketing wisdom, customers’ preferences must be analyzed correctly to create successful products, and in the gaming industry, such information must be considered during the design process. This research aims to explore key factors of heuristic evaluation for game design. A review of literature pertaining to computer games and HCI was conducted along with an empirical research of a Massively Multi-player Online Role-playing Game (MMORPG). We identified 18 usability issues in MMORPG and presented a recommendation relevant to the issues. Empirical data were applied to a new heuristic evaluation framework. We determined the relationship between key factors and four game categories, such as game interface, game play, game narrative, and game mechanics. Moreover, the results presented 54 key factors for a new heuristic evaluation framework for game design. The conclusion presents key implications of our research in a game design context, particularly related to early design processes. r 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Polls and Surveys: Understanding What they Tell Us , 1992 .

[2]  Melissa A. Federoff,et al.  HEURISTICS AND USABILITY GUIDELINES FOR THE CREATION AND EVALUATION OF FUN IN VIDEO GAMES , 2002 .

[3]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games , 1982, CHI '82.

[4]  Joseph S. Dumas,et al.  User-based evaluations , 2002 .

[5]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[6]  Stephanie Rosenbaum,et al.  Usability studies of WWW sites: heuristic evaluation vs. laboratory testing , 1997, SIGDOC '97.

[7]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology , 1995, Quality of Life Research.

[8]  Chuck Clanton,et al.  An interpreted demonstration of computer game design , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[9]  Heather Desurvire,et al.  Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[10]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[11]  David Myers.  A Q-Study of Game Player Aesthetics , 1990 .

[12]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research / by Richard A. Krueger , 1989 .

[13]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  What Makes Things Fun to Learn? A Study of Intrinsically Motivating Computer Games. , 1981 .

[14]  Tony Manninen,et al.  RICH INTERACTION MODEL FOR GAME AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT DESIGN , 2004 .

[15]  Steve Cornett,et al.  The usability of massively multiplayer online roleplaying games: designing for new users , 2004, CHI.

[16]  Peter Bickford.  Interface design - the art of developing easy-to-use software , 1997 .

[17]  Carol M. Barnum,et al.  Usability testing and research , 2001 .

[18]  Chris Crawford,et al.  The Art of Computer Game Design , 1984 .

[19]  Randy J. Pagulayan,et al.  User-centered design in games , 2012 .

[20]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Playability in Action Videogames: A Qualitative Design Model , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[21]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[22]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes , 1994 .

[23]  Dennis R. Wixon,et al.  Using the RITE method to improve products; a definition and a case study , 2007 .

[24]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Thinking about Answers: The Application of Cognitive Process to Survey Methodology , 1996 .

[25]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .