Driver detection and recognition of lineside signals and signs at different approach speeds

A study was carried out using simulation to investigate driver responses to lineside signals and signs at various approach speeds. The objectives of the study were: (1) to find out whether train speed would significantly affect signal/sign reading; (2) to examine at which point certain types of signs or signals could be detected or recognised, and (3) to determine a speed cut-off level above which certain types of signs or signals are no longer recognisable or detectable. Fifty-seven train drivers from 12 Train Operating Companies in the UK participated in the trials. Twenty different types of lineside signs and ten types of signals were tested under six different approach speeds ranging from 100 to 350 km/h (62–218 mph). Driver performance measures were ‘time remaining to the signal/sign’ at the point of detection or recognition, and reading error rate. The results showed a significant influence of train speed on driver responses to lineside signals/signs and demonstrated a non-linear relationship between driver responses to signals/signs and approach speed. This has been used to estimate a maximum approach speed limit within which a specific signal or sign can be correctly detected or recognised. The findings and implications of the study are discussed in the paper.

[1]  D. R MESTRE,et al.  Ocular Responses to Motion Parallax Stimuli: The Role of Perceptual and Attentional Factors , 1997, Vision Research.

[2]  Donald Richard Drew,et al.  Traffic flow theory and control , 1968 .

[3]  E Heikkinen,et al.  Reaction and Movement Times in Men of Different Ages: A Population Study , 1986, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  M. Albert,et al.  Performance-based driving evaluation of the elderly driver: safety, reliability, and validity. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[5]  Helen Middleton,et al.  Driver Eye Movement During a Route Navigation Information Search , 2001 .

[6]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[7]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[8]  R. A. Hamnett,et al.  British railway track : design, construction and maintenance , 1956 .

[9]  W. H. Teichner.  Recent studies of simple reaction time. , 1954, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Rachel V. North.  Work and the Eye , 1994 .

[11]  B L Cole,et al.  What attracts attention when driving? , 1986, Ergonomics.

[12]  Lisbeth Harms,et al.  Driving performance on a real road and in a driving simulator: Results of a validation study , 1996 .

[13]  Gerard J. Blaauw,et al.  Driving Experience and Task Demands in Simulator and Instrumented Car: A Validation Study , 1982 .

[14]  Theodore J. Rosenthal,et al.  Simulator Evaluation of Road Signs and Signals , 1994 .

[15]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Latency functions in human vision. , 1973, Vision research.

[16]  J Toernros,et al.  DRIVING BEHAVIOUR IN A REAL AND A SIMULATED ROAD TUNNEL , 1996 .

[17]  B Hesketh,et al.  Learning from errors in a driving simulation: effects on driving skill and self-confidence , 2000, Ergonomics.

[18]  P L Olson,et al.  Perception-Response Time to Unexpected Roadway Hazards , 1986, Human factors.

[19]  Lena Nilsson.  Behavioural Research in an Advanced Driving Simulator - Experiences of the VTI System - , 1993 .

[20]  Mark Ward.  Driving simulators for the elderly , 1996 .

[21]  B L Hills,et al.  A reanalysis of California driver vision data: general findings , 1977 .

[22]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[23]  D A Fraser,et al.  Effects of extra signals on drivers' distance keeping-a simulation study , 1994 .

[24]  H. Summala,et al.  Drivers' immediate responses to traffic signs. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[25]  Kenji Itoh,et al.  Eye-Movement Analysis of Track Monitoring Patterns of Night Train Operators: Effects of Geographic Knowledge and Fatigue , 2000 .

[26]  S Arndt,et al.  The effects of anabolic steroids on driving performance as assessed by the Iowa Driver Simulator. , 1997, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse.

[27]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Reaction times in the detection of gratings by human observers: A probabilistic mechanism , 1975, Vision Research.

[28]  Thomas Schnell,et al.  SIMULATION AND MEASUREMENT OF DRIVER AND VEHICLE PERFORMANCE , 2000 .

[29]  David Shinar,et al.  Eye Movements of Younger and Older Drivers , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[30]  E. Hoffmann,et al.  Drivers' awareness of traffic sign information , 1991 .

[31]  M Rahimi,et al.  A field evaluation of driver eye and head movement strategies toward environmental targets and distractors. , 1990, Applied ergonomics.

[32]  C. L. Heeler,et al.  British railway track : design, construction and maintenance , 1979 .

[33]  Thomas H. Rockwell,et al.  Role of peripheral vision and time-sharing in driving , 1971 .

[34]  Thomas H. Rockwell,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN DRIVER PERCEPTION ON RURAL CURVE NEGOTIATION , 1980 .

[35]  T A Greaves.  Driver's Environment Technology in the Driving Cab , 1989 .

[36]  K Rumar,et al.  Drivers and road signs: a preliminary investigation of the capacity of car drivers to get information from road signs. , 1966, Ergonomics.

[37]  A. Burg.  The relationship between vision test scores and driving record; general findings , 1967 .

[38]  Hans Godthelp,et al.  Speed Choice and Steering Behavior in Curve Driving , 1996, Hum. Factors.