Safety Assessment of Advanced Imaging Sequences II: Simulations

An automatic approach for simulating the emitted pressure, intensity, and mechanical index (MI) of advanced ultrasound imaging sequences is presented. It is based on a linear simulation of pressure fields using Field II, and it is hypothesized that linear simulation can attain the needed accuracy for predicting MI and Ispta.3 as required by FDA. The method is performed on four different imaging schemes and compared to measurements conducted using the SARUS experimental scanner. The sequences include focused emissions with an F-number of 2 with 64 elements that generate highly nonlinear fields. The simulation time is between 0.67 and 2.8 ms per emission and imaging point, making it possible to simulate even complex emission sequences in less than 1 s for a single spatial position. The linear simulations yield a relative accuracy on MI between -12.1% and 52.3% and for Ispta.3 between -38.6% and 62.6%, when using the impulse response of the probe estimated from an independent measurement. The accuracy is increased to between -22% and 24.5% for MI and between -33.2% and 27.0% for Ispta.3, when using the pressure response measured at a single point to scale the simulation. The spatial distribution of MI and Ita.3 closely matches that for the measurement, and simulations can, therefore, be used to select the region for measuring the intensities, resulting in a significant reduction in measurement time. It can validate emission sequences by showing symmetry of emitted pressure fields, focal position, and intensity distribution.

[1]  K. Wear,et al.  Improved measurement of acoustic output using complex deconvolution of hydrophone sensitivity , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[2]  W. P. Mason Electromechanical transducers and wave filters , 1942 .

[3]  Franck Levassort,et al.  Lens-focused transducer modeling using an extended KLM model. , 2007, Ultrasonics.

[4]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[5]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[6]  Alistair P. Rendell,et al.  Modeling nonlinear ultrasound propagation in heterogeneous media with power law absorption using a k-space pseudospectral method. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Simon Holbek,et al.  Safety Assessment of Advanced Imaging Sequences I: Measurements , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[8]  Jorgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  A multi-threaded version of Field II , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[9]  S. I. Nikolov,et al.  SARUS: A synthetic aperture real-time ultrasound system , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[10]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[11]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  Convex array vector velocity imaging using transverse oscillation and its optimization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[12]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  J. Jensen Estimation of Blood Velocities Using Ultrasound: A Signal Processing Approach , 1996 .

[14]  J. Jensen,et al.  Modeling transducer impulse responses for predicting calibrated pressure pulses with the ultrasound simulation program Field II. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  John M. Reid,et al.  Doppler Ultrasound , 1987, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[16]  E. Sittig Transmission Parameters of Thickness-Driven Piezoelectric Transducers Arranged in Multilayer Configurations , 1967 .

[17]  3C-2 Full-Wave Simulation of Finite-Amplitude Ultrasound in Heterogeneous Media , 2007, 2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings.

[18]  W. M. Leue,et al.  Acoustic intensity simulations for regulatory compliance , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[19]  G. Tupholme Generation of acoustic pulses by baffled plane pistons , 1969 .

[20]  J. Jensen,et al.  Adaptive multi-lag for synthetic aperture vector flow imaging , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[21]  W. McDicken,et al.  Doppler Ultrasound: Physics, Instrumentation and Signal Processing , 2000 .

[22]  J. Arendt Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[23]  P. Stepanishen Transient Radiation from Pistons in an Infinite Planar Baffle , 1970 .