‘Good Morning Fitfam’: Top posts, hashtags and gender display on Instagram

Social networking sites are important platforms for visual self-presentation online. This article investigates how content producers present their gender identities on the social networking site, Instagram. We draw upon and develop Goffman’s analytic framework to understand the self-presentation techniques and styles users employ online. Conducting a visual content analysis of clean eating–related top posts, we examine how users deploy clean eating hashtags and how the architecture of Instagram constrains and enables certain identities around shared lifestyles and commercial interests. Our findings reveal the symbolic significance of hashtags for group membership and the degree to which gender identities on Instagram are configured around platform interfaces.

[1]  R. Connell,et al.  Hegemonic Masculinity , 2005 .

[2]  Lois Ann Scheidt,et al.  It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens , 2015, New Media Soc..

[3]  José van Dijck,et al.  'You have one identity': performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn , 2013 .

[4]  J. Butler.  Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity , 1990 .

[5]  Raewyn Connell,et al.  Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. , 1991 .

[6]  Peter Tolmie,et al.  Living with interpersonal data: Observability and accountability in the age of pervasive ICT , 2018, New Media Soc..

[7]  Adriana de Souza e Silva,et al.  Location-aware mobile media and urban sociability , 2011, New Media Soc..

[8]  E. Goffman.  The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address , 1983 .

[9]  S. Rose.  Limited Livelihoods: Gender and Class in Nineteenth-Century England , 1991 .

[10]  Antoine Hennion,et al.  Those Things That Hold Us Together: Taste and Sociology , 2007 .

[11]  Mimi Schippers,et al.  Recovering the feminine other: masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony , 2007 .

[12]  A. Hochschild,et al.  The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. , 1985 .

[13]  D. Khor,et al.  “Doing Gender” , 2007 .

[14]  Jodi O'Brien,et al.  The Production of Reality: Essays and Readings on Social Interaction , 1997 .

[15]  S. Baker,et al.  The selfie and the transformation of the public–private distinction , 2017 .

[16]  K. Crenshaw.  Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color , 1991 .

[17]  Brady Robards,et al.  Being strategic and taking control: Bedrooms, social network sites and the narratives of growing up , 2016, New Media Soc..

[18]  Meesun Kang.  The portrayal of women’s images in magazine advertisements: Goffman’s gender analysis revisited , 1997 .

[19]  C. Moorley,et al.  Nursing and Twitter: creating an online community using hashtags. , 2014, Collegian.

[20]  M. Wohlrab-Sahr,et al.  Interaction ritual chains , 2006 .

[21]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app , 2015, New Media Soc..

[22]  José van Dijck,et al.  Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content , 2009 .

[23]  T. Pinch.  The Invisible Technologies of Goffman's Sociology From the Merry-Go-Round to the Internet , 2010 .

[24]  R. Collins.  The Passing of Intellectual Generations: Reflections on the Death of Erving Goffman , 1986 .

[25]  D. Boyd.  Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications , 2010 .

[26]  Norman K. Denzin,et al.  The Interaction Order , 2019 .

[27]  Nicola Döring,et al.  How gender-stereotypical are selfies? A content analysis and comparison with magazine adverts , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Richard Ling.  New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication Is Reshaping Social Cohesion , 2008 .

[29]  Sanjay Sharma.  Black Twitter?: Racial Hashtags, Networks and Contagion , 2013 .

[30]  D. Horton,et al.  Mass communication and para-social interaction; observations on intimacy at a distance. , 1956, Psychiatry.

[31]  Hugo Liu,et al.  Social Network Profiles as Taste Performances , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[32]  Andrea P. Herrera.  Theorizing the lesbian hashtag: Identity, community, and the technological imperative to name the sexual self , 2018, Journal of lesbian studies.

[33]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[34]  Sorrel King,et al.  Our story , 2019, Pediatric Radiology.

[35]  J. M. Wedel.  Ladies, we've been framed , 1978 .

[36]  R. Jenkins.  The 21st-Century Interaction Order , 2010 .

[37]  A. J. Wootton,et al.  Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order. , 1992 .

[38]  T. Lewis.  DIY selves? , 2006 .

[39]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[40]  M. R. Kerbel.  What About Us? , 2018, Remote & Controlled.

[41]  The stigma of clean dieting and orthorexia nervosa , 2017, Journal of eating disorders.

[42]  M. Mycek.  Meatless meals and masculinity: How veg* men explain their plant-based diets , 2018 .

[43]  Ana Cristina Vasconcelos,et al.  ‘The presentation of self in the online world’: Goffman and the study of online identities , 2013, J. Inf. Sci..

[44]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .