High-Lift OVERFLOW Analysis of the DLR-F11 Wind Tunnel Model

In response to the 2nd AIAA CFD High Lift Prediction Workshop, the DLR-F11 wind tunnel model is analyzed using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes flow solver OVERFLOW. A series of overset grids for a bracket-off landing configuration is constructed and analyzed as part of a general grid refinement study. This high Reynolds number (15.1 million) analysis is done at multiple angles-of-attack to evaluate grid resolution effects at operational lift levels as well as near stall. A quadratic constitutive relation recently added to OVERFLOW for improved solution accuracy is utilized for side-of-body separation issues at low angles-of-attack and outboard wing separation at stall angles. The outboard wing separation occurs when the slat brackets are added to the landing configuration and is a source of discrepancy between the predictions and experimental data. A detailed flow field analysis is performed at low Reynolds number (1.35 million) after pressure tube bundles are added to the bracket-on medium grid system with the intent of better understanding bracket/bundle wake interaction with the wing's boundary layer. Localized grid refinement behind each slat bracket and pressure tube bundle coupled with a time accurate analysis are exercised in an attempt to improve stall prediction capability. The results are inconclusive and suggest the simulation is missing a key element such as boundary layer transition. The computed lift curve is under-predicted through the linear range and over-predicted near stall, and the solution from the most complete configuration analyzed shows outboard wing separation occurring behind slat bracket 6 where the experiment shows it behind bracket 5. These results are consistent with most other participants of this workshop.

[1]  Carlo A. Furia,et al.  User manual , 2023, International Transport Forum Policy Papers.

[2]  Edward N. Tinoco,et al.  Summary of Data from the Fifth Computational Fluid Dynamics Drag Prediction Workshop , 2014 .

[3]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Drag Prediction for the NASA CRM Wing-Body-Tail Using CFL3D and OVERFLOW on an Overset Mesh , 2010 .

[4]  Robert H. Nichols,et al.  Algorithm and Turbulence Model Requirements for Simulating Vortical Flows , 2008 .

[5]  Deryl O. Snyder,et al.  Numerical Simulation of DLR-F11 High Lift Configuration from HiLiftPW-2 using STAR-CCM+ , 2014 .

[6]  Benedikt Koenig,et al.  Lattice-Boltzmann Flow Simulations for the HiLiftPW-2 , 2014 .

[7]  Michael Long,et al.  Summary of the First AIAA CFD High Lift Prediction Workshop , 2011 .

[8]  L Swadner Graphical User Interface , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[9]  Carol D. Wieseman,et al.  Overview of the Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop , 2013 .

[10]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  DPW-5 Analysis of the CRM in a Wing-Body Configuration Using Structured and Unstructured Meshes , 2013 .

[11]  Christopher L. Rumsey,et al.  Overview and Summary of the Second AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop , 2015 .

[12]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[13]  Ralf Rudnik,et al.  EUROLIFT Test Case Description for the 2nd High Lift Prediction Workshop , 2012 .

[14]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  OVERFLOW Analysis of the NASA Trap Wing Model from the First High Lift Prediction Workshop , 2011 .

[15]  Stuart E. Rogers,et al.  Pegasus 5: An Automated Pre-Processor for Overset-Grid Cfd , 2013 .

[16]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  NSU3D Results for the Second AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop , 2015 .

[17]  Pieter G. Buning,et al.  User's manual for the HYPGEN hyperbolic grid generator and the HGUI graphical user interface , 1993 .