Spread of tweets in climate discussions: A case study of the 2019 Nobel Peace Prize announcement

Abstract Characterising the spreading of ideas within echo chambers is essential for understanding polarisation. In this article, we explore the characteristics of popular and viral content in climate change discussions on Twitter around the 2019 announcement of the Nobel Peace Prize, where we find the retweet network of users to be polarised into two well-separated groups of activists and sceptics. Operationalising popularity as the number of retweets and virality as the spreading probability inferred using an independent cascade model, we find that the viral themes echo and differ from the popular themes in interesting ways. Most importantly, we find that the most viral themes in the two groups reflect different types of bonds that tie the community together, yet both function to enhance ingroup connections while repulsing outgroup engagement. With this, our study sheds light, from an information-spreading perspective, on the formation and upkeep of echo chambers in climate discussions.

[1]  Zhenlong Li,et al.  Topic modeling and sentiment analysis of global climate change tweets , 2019, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[2]  Mikko Kivelä,et al.  Polarization of Climate Politics Results from Partisan Sorting: Evidence from Finnish Twittersphere , 2020, Global Environmental Change.

[3]  Taylor W. Brown,et al.  Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Ashley Muddiman,et al.  (Re)Claiming Our Expertise: Parsing Large Text Corpora With Manually Validated and Organic Dictionaries , 2018, Political Communication.

[5]  Sarah Birch,et al.  Political polarization and environmental attitudes: a cross-national analysis , 2020, Environmental Politics.

[6]  Aristides Gionis,et al.  Quantifying Controversy on Social Media , 2018, ACM Trans. Soc. Comput..

[7]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Affective Polarization in Online Climate Change Discourse on Twitter , 2020, 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[8]  Kevin Munger.  The Limited Value of Non-Replicable Field Experiments in Contexts With Low Temporal Validity , 2019, Social Media + Society.

[9]  Vipin Kumar,et al.  A Fast and High Quality Multilevel Scheme for Partitioning Irregular Graphs , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[10]  Felix Naumann,et al.  Analyzing and predicting viral tweets , 2013, WWW.

[11]  M. Yuan,et al.  Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables , 2006 .

[12]  Christopher J. Fariss,et al.  Enhancing Validity in Observational Settings When Replication Is Not Possible , 2018 .

[13]  Michael A Babyak,et al.  What You See May Not Be What You Get: A Brief, Nontechnical Introduction to Overfitting in Regression-Type Models , 2004, Psychosomatic medicine.

[14]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks , 2008 .

[15]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Virality Prediction and Community Structure in Social Networks , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[17]  Charalampos E. Tsourakakis,et al.  Minimizing Polarization and Disagreement in Social Networks , 2017, WWW.

[18]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[19]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  A Qualitative Examination of Topical Tweet and Retweet Practices , 2010, ICWSM.

[20]  Heather C. Lench,et al.  On the Function of Boredom , 2013, Behavioral sciences.

[21]  Bryan C. Semaan,et al.  Social Media Is Polarized, Social Media Is Polarized: Towards a New Design Agenda for Mitigating Polarization , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[22]  Gözde Özbal,et al.  Exploring Text Virality in Social Networks , 2011, ICWSM.

[23]  正樹 渡邉,et al.  Sensation Seeking とヘルスリスク行動との関連 , 1998 .

[24]  Christopher M. Danforth,et al.  Climate Change Sentiment on Twitter: An Unsolicited Public Opinion Poll , 2015, PloS one.

[25]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Good Friends, Bad News - Affect and Virality in Twitter , 2011, ArXiv.

[26]  Stefan Stieglitz,et al.  Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media—Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Peter M. Dahlgren.  A critical review of filter bubbles and a comparison with selective exposure , 2021, Nordicom Review.

[28]  Hywel T. P. Williams,et al.  Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change , 2015 .

[29]  Igor M. Sokolov,et al.  Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks , 2019, Physical review letters.

[30]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[31]  Gerardo Iñiguez,et al.  Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks , 2018, Science Advances.

[32]  A. Kirilenko,et al.  Public microblogging on climate change: One year of Twitter worldwide , 2014 .

[33]  K. Holmberg,et al.  Climate Change on Twitter: Topics, Communities and Conversations about the 2013 IPCC Working Group 1 Report , 2014, PloS one.

[34]  Nicola Barbieri,et al.  Topic-aware social influence propagation models , 2012, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[35]  S. M. Jang,et al.  Polarized frames on ''climate change'' and ''global warming'' across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data , 2015 .

[36]  A. McCright,et al.  The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010 , 2011 .

[37]  Luca Rossi,et al.  An Innovative Way to Model Twitter Topic-Driven Interactions Using Multiplex Networks , 2019, Front. Big Data.

[38]  Daniel M McNeish,et al.  Using Lasso for Predictor Selection and to Assuage Overfitting: A Method Long Overlooked in Behavioral Sciences , 2015, Multivariate behavioral research.

[39]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..

[40]  Douglas M. Hawkins,et al.  The Problem of Overfitting , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[41]  Masahiro Kimura,et al.  Prediction of Information Diffusion Probabilities for Independent Cascade Model , 2008, KES.