Prevalence of rupture of silicone gel breast implants revealed on MR imaging in a population of women in Birmingham, Alabama.

OBJECTIVE Silicone gel breast implants have been reported to rupture, but the prevalence of implant rupture in an unreferred population of women is not known. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of implant rupture and the presence of extracapsular silicone gel in an unreferred population of women without regard to the absence or presence of any local or systemic symptoms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Women identified as part of a National Cancer Institute cohort study on breast implants, living in the Birmingham, AL, area were invited to undergo MR imaging of their current silicone gel breast implants at the Kirklin Clinic at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Three radiologists independently examined and rated all MR images for signs of implant rupture and extracapsular silicone. RESULTS A total of 344 women with silicone gel breast implants underwent MR imaging. Breast implant rupture was reported by at least two of three radiologists for 378 (55.0%) of the 687 implants in this study. Another 50 implants (7.2%) were rated as indeterminate (suspicious) for rupture. A majority of women in this study, 265 (77.0%) of 344, had at least one breast implant that was rated as ruptured or indeterminate. Radiologists also agreed that silicone gel could be seen outside the fibrous capsule that forms around the implant in 85 (12.4%) of the 687 implants affecting 73 women (21.2%). Factors that affected implant rupture were implant age and location (submuscular or subglandular). The median implant age at rupture was estimated to be 10.8 years with a 95% confidence interval of 8.4-13.9 years. CONCLUSION The prevalence of silent or occult silicone gel breast implant rupture is higher than was previously suspected. Most women in this study had MR imaging evidence of at least one ruptured silicone gel breast implant.

[1]  A. Luini,et al.  Cosmetic and reconstructive surgery and risk of breast cancer , 2001 .

[2]  D. Sharpe Comment on: “Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) hydrogels used to fill breast implants: a 15-year experience” by H. Arion , 2001, European Journal of Plastic Surgery.

[3]  T. Hunter,et al.  Overview of medical devices. , 2001, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[4]  A. Brawer Amelioration of Systemic Disease after Removal of Silicone Gel-filled Breast Implants , 2000 .

[5]  M. Habal,et al.  Silicone gel breast implant failure and frequency of additional surgeries: analysis of 35 studies reporting examination of more than 8,000 explants. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  S. Lugowski,et al.  Breast milk contamination and silicone implants: preliminary results using silicon as a proxy measurement for silicone. , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  M. Middleton Magnetic resonance evaluation of breast implants and soft-tissue silicone. , 1998, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[8]  U. Chetty,et al.  Silicone Gel‐Filled Breast Implants and Connective Tissue Diseases , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  I. Thornton,et al.  Platinum concentrations in urban road dust and soil, and in blood and urine in the United Kingdom. , 1998, The Analyst.

[10]  R. Lebovitz,et al.  Release of low molecular weight silicones and platinum from silicone breast implants. , 1997, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  W. Berg,et al.  Rupture of silicone-gel breast implants: causes, sequelae, and diagnosis , 1997, The Lancet.

[12]  Intracapsular implant rupture: MR findings of incomplete shell collapse , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  W M O'Fallon,et al.  Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  S. Lugowski,et al.  Failure properties of 352 explanted silicone-gel breast implants , 1996 .

[15]  P. Kornguth,et al.  Complex radial folds versus subtle signs of intracapsular rupture of breast implants: MR findings with surgical correlation. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  R. Bright,et al.  Reported Complications of Silicone Gel Breast Implants: An Epidemiologic Review , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  B. Patten,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Clinical Examination and Various Imaging Techniques for Breast Implant Rupture as Determined in 81 Patients Having Implant Removal , 1996, Southern medical journal.

[18]  J. Manson,et al.  Self-reported breast implants and connective-tissue diseases in female health professionals. A retrospective cohort study. , 1996, JAMA.

[19]  Mohamed Shoukri,et al.  Statistical Methods for Health Sciences , 1995 .

[20]  E. Zerhouni,et al.  Single- and double- lumen silicone breast implant integrity: prospective evaluation of MR and US criteria. , 1995, Radiology.

[21]  L. Brinton,et al.  Epidemiologic follow-up studies of breast augmentation patients. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  E. Bradley,et al.  Analysis of Explanted Silicone Implants: A Report of 300 Patients , 1995, Annals of plastic surgery.

[23]  S. Teuber,et al.  Silicone breast implant-associated scarring dystrophy of the arm. , 1995, Archives of dermatology.

[24]  L. Bassett,et al.  Comparative silicone breast implant evaluation using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: experience with 59 implants. , 1994, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[25]  C. Piccoli Invited Discussion: Imaging Modalities for Breast Implants , 1994 .

[26]  E. Zerhouni,et al.  MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicone breast implants: normal postoperative variants and diagnostic pitfalls. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  V. Jackson,et al.  Comparison of Mammography, Sonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Silicone‐Gel Breast Implant Rupture , 1994, Annals of plastic surgery.

[28]  R. Friedman Silicone breast prostheses implantation and explanation. , 1994, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[29]  M. Potter,et al.  Induction of plasmacytomas with silicone gel in genetically susceptible strains of mice. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[30]  A. Stillman,et al.  Diagnosis of breast implant rupture: imaging findings and relative efficacies of imaging techniques. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Risk of connective-tissue diseases and other disorders after breast implantation , 1994 .

[32]  Silicone breast implant rupture: comparison between three-point Dixon and fast spin-echo MR imaging. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  N. Fenske,et al.  Silicone-associated connective-tissue disease. The debate rages. , 1993, Archives of dermatology.

[34]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Screening mammography in 350 women with breast implants: prevalence and findings of implant complications. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  L W Bassett,et al.  Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR imaging. , 1992, Radiology.

[36]  R. L. Forsythe Silicone gel implant failure. , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[37]  Müller Nl,et al.  Ruptured breast implant: computed tomographic and mammographic findings. , 1988 .

[38]  S. Bennett,et al.  Log‐Logistic Regression Models for Survival Data , 1983 .