Minimax regret strategies for greenhouse gas abatement: methodology and application

Classical stochastic programming has already been used with large-scale LP models for long-term analysis of energy-environment systems. We propose a Minimax Regret formulation suitable for large-scale linear programming models. It has been experimentally verified that the minimax regret strategy depends only on the extremal scenarios and not on the intermediate ones, thus making the approach computationally efficient. Key results of minimax regret and minimum expected value strategies for Greenhouse Gas abatement in the Province of Quebec, are compared.

[1]  J. Stone Climate change 1995: The science of climate change. Contribution of working group I to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change , 1997 .

[2]  Charles D. Kolstad George Bush versus Al Gore : irreversibilities in greenhouse gas accumulation and emission control investment , 1994 .

[3]  Mark Rounsevell,et al.  Climate Change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 1996 .

[4]  Stephen C. Peck,et al.  Optimal CO2 control policy with stochastic losses from temperature rise , 1995 .

[5]  Alain Haurie,et al.  MARKAL-Geneva: A model to assess energy-environment choices for a Swiss canton , 1996 .

[6]  Leslie G. Fishbone,et al.  Markal, a linear‐programming model for energy systems analysis: Technical description of the bnl version , 1981 .

[7]  Clas-Otto Wene,et al.  Developing strategies for robust energy systems. I: Methodology , 1993 .

[8]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  The Greenhouse Debate: Econonmic Efficiency, Burden Sharing and Hedging Strategies , 1995 .

[9]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Rolling the ‘DICE’: an optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases , 1993 .

[10]  R. Loulou,et al.  MARKAL Model with Elastic Demands: Application to Greenhouse Gas Emission Control , 1996 .

[11]  L. Boorman,et al.  Climate change 1995—Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: Scientific-technical analyses: Contribution of working group II to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change , 1997 .

[12]  W. Patterson Energy policy , 1978, Nature.

[13]  Alain Haurie,et al.  Canadian MARKAL: An advanced Linear Programming System for Energy and Environmental Modelling , 1990 .

[14]  QK Ahmad,et al.  Climate change 1995. Economic and social dimensions of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change , 1997 .

[15]  Jean-Philippe Waaub,et al.  MARKAL Based CO 2 Control : Scenarios for Québec and Ontario , 1993 .

[16]  Richard Loulou,et al.  Extended MARKAL: A Brief User Manual for its Stochastic Programming and Multi-Region Features , 1997 .

[17]  R. Loulou,et al.  CO2 Control with Cooperation in Québec and Ontario: A MARKAL Perspective , 1993 .

[18]  H. Brachinger,et al.  Decision analysis , 1997 .

[19]  P. R. H. Sales,et al.  Coordinating the Energy Generation of the Brazilian National Hydrothermal Electrical Generating System , 1986 .

[20]  Amit Kanudia,et al.  Robust responses to climate change via stochastic MARKAL: The case of Québec , 1996, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  MERGE. A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies , 1995 .

[22]  R. Wets,et al.  Stochastic programming , 1989 .