Phase Ib/II Trial of NC-6004 (Nanoparticle Cisplatin) Plus Gemcitabine in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Purpose: NC-6004, a novel cisplatin nanoparticle developed using micellar technology exhibits sustained release of cisplatin and selective distribution to tumors. Preclinical data demonstrated a favorable tolerability profile and preserved or improved antitumor activity compared with cisplatin across animal models. We evaluated the safety and tolerability of NC-6004 and gemcitabine using a Bayesian continual reassessment model (N-CRM) to determine the optimal dose. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid tumors received NC-6004 at 60 to 180 mg/m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine at 1,250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Dose escalation of NC-6004 began with a single patient run-in until a dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 180 mg/m2. Cohorts of four patients were enrolled at doses predicted by the N-CRM. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as having the greatest probability of target toxicity <25%. Quality of life was assessed using EORTC-QLQ-C30. Results: Among 22 patients, the most common grade III/IV hematologic adverse events were leukopenia (68%) and thrombocytopenia (59%). Of 20 pretreated patients evaluable for response, half were previously exposed to a platinum agent. The MTD was 135 mg/m2. Nine patients were treated at the MTD with median treatment duration of 15 weeks (range, 3–50). Tumor shrinkage occurred in 11 (55%), partial responses in 3 (15%), and stable disease in 14 (70%). Most patients reported stable or improved EORTC QLQ-C30 scores. Conclusions: Greater cisplatin equivalent doses were achieved with no clinically significant neuro-, oto-, or nephrotoxicity. These data demonstrate tolerability and promising activity of NC-6004 in combination with gemcitabine. Clin Cancer Res; 24(1); 43–51. ©2017 AACR.

[1]  A. Ohtsu,et al.  NC-6004 Phase I study in combination with gemcitabine for advanced solid tumors and population PK/PD analysis , 2017, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[2]  E. Bruera,et al.  2016 MASCC and ESMO guideline update for the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and of nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[3]  Ranjita Shegokar,et al.  Polyethylene glycol (PEG): a versatile polymer for pharmaceutical applications , 2016, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[4]  Longhua Chen,et al.  A meta-analysis comparing cisplatin-based to carboplatin-based chemotherapy in moderate to advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN) , 2016, Oncotarget.

[5]  Jürgen Hummel,et al.  Using simulation to optimize adaptive trial designs: applications in learning and confirmatory phase trials , 2015 .

[6]  Gregory R Pond,et al.  Phase 1 trial design: is 3 + 3 the best? , 2014, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.

[7]  Y. Matsumoto,et al.  Micellization of cisplatin (NC-6004) reduces its ototoxicity in guinea pigs. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[8]  M. Uesaka,et al.  Accumulation of sub-100 nm polymeric micelles in poorly permeable tumours depends on size. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[9]  G. Sonpavde,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of cisplatin-based and carboplatin-based chemotherapy for treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  A. Boddy,et al.  A Phase I clinical study of cisplatin-incorporated polymeric micelles (NC-6004) in patients with solid tumours , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  Michael Branson,et al.  Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  Joon-Oh Park,et al.  Phase III trial of two versus four additional cycles in patients who are nonprogressive after two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy in non small-cell lung cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  D. Amadori,et al.  Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium: results of a randomized phase 2 trial. , 2007, European urology.

[14]  R. Bremnes,et al.  Palliative chemotherapy beyond three courses conveys no survival or consistent quality-of-life benefits in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  N. Nishiyama,et al.  Cisplatin-incorporating polymeric micelles (NC-6004) can reduce nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity of cisplatin in rats , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  Y. Sugiyama,et al.  Novel cisplatin-incorporated polymeric micelles can eradicate solid tumors in mice. , 2003, Cancer research.

[17]  Hans-Peter Lipp,et al.  Toxicity of platinum compounds , 2003, Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy.

[18]  Michael J Schell,et al.  Phase III trial comparing a defined duration of therapy versus continuous therapy followed by second-line therapy in advanced-stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  M. Piccart,et al.  Current and future potential roles of the platinum drugs in the treatment of ovarian cancer. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[20]  Alberts,et al.  New Perspectives on an Old Friend: Optimizing Carboplatin for the Treatment of Solid Tumors. , 1998, The oncologist.

[21]  A. Ribas,et al.  Carboplatin‐based versus cisplatin‐based chemotherapy in the treatment of surgically incurable advanced bladder carcinoma , 1997, Cancer.

[22]  S. Mondillo,et al.  Comparison between a cisplatin‐containing regimen and a carboplatin‐containing regimen for recurrent or metastatic bladder cancer patients: A randomized phase II study , 1996, Cancer.

[23]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Randomized trial of neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil versus carboplatin and fluorouracil in patients with stage IV-M0 head and neck cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  L. Hutchins,et al.  Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group study. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  P. Gill,et al.  Creatinine clearance as a predictor of ultrafilterable platinum disposition in cancer patients treated with cisplatin: relationship between peak ultrafilterable platinum plasma levels and nephrotoxicity. , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  H. Maeda,et al.  A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. , 1986, Cancer research.

[27]  R. Gupta,et al.  Renal impairment and late toxicity in germ-cell cancer survivors. , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[28]  Khaled Greish,et al.  Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for anticancer nanomedicine drug targeting. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.