New class of Grayscale Morphological Filter to enhance infrared building target

Nowadays, Grayscale Morphological Filter (GMF) is a well-founded non-linear filtering for image processing. Its geometry-oriented nature provides a strong framework for addressing shape characteristics such as size, connectivity, and others, which are not easily accessed by the traditional linear approach. Therefore, grayscale morphological filters have been widely used to enhance and detect the infrared small target, but it is rarely applied to the domain of building target enhancement in dense urban sites. Additionally, its ability to build target enhancements is weak. If the Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR) of the image is low or the simarilty-pattem of the image is high or the image has been contaminated by heavy structured clutters, the traditional grayscale morphological filter may decrease image quality, leading to the loss of target and an increase in false alarms. Therefore, the primary operations of the traditional grayscale morphology, such as erosion, dilatation, opening, closing, and top-hat operations, have drawbacks of creating artificial patterns and distorting or removing significant details. Although they may perform well in some cases, these methods do not really improve the enhancement ability of the grayscale morphological filter.

[1]  P. Jackway Improved morphological top-hat , 2000 .

[2]  Meng Hwa Er,et al.  Max-mean and max-median filters for detection of small targets , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[3]  Zhang Peng,et al.  The design of Top-Hat morphological filter and application to infrared target detection , 2006 .

[4]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[5]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  A pyramid approach for multimodality image registration based on mutual information , 2000, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Fusion.

[6]  Fei Zhang,et al.  Detecting and tracking dim moving point target in IR image sequence , 2005 .

[7]  D Mendlovic,et al.  Modified morphological correlation based on bit-map representations. , 1999, Applied optics.

[8]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  An introduction to morphological image processing , 1992 .

[9]  Xiangzhi Bai,et al.  New class of top-hat transformation to enhance infrared small targets , 2008, J. Electronic Imaging.

[10]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Courtney I. Hilliard,et al.  Selection of a clutter rejection algorithm for real-time target detection from an airborne platform , 2000, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  R. Keys Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing , 1981 .

[13]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Image Similarity Using Mutual Information of Regions , 2004, ECCV.

[14]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Mutual information-based image registration for remote sensing data , 2003 .

[15]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Voxel similarity measures for 3-D serial MR brain image registration , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Ronald G. Driggers,et al.  New metric for predicting target acquisition performance , 2004 .

[17]  Werner Nagel Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. Volume 2: Theoretical Advances. Edited by Jean Serra , 1870 .

[18]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.