Iterative distributed algorithms for real-time available transfer capability assessment of multiarea power systems

This paper studies iterative distributed algorithms for real-time available transfer capability (ATC) assessment in energy management systems of multiarea power systems. Since ATC calculations can be modeled as a special nonlinear optimal power-flow problem, iterative decomposition-coordination approaches based on constrained augmented Lagrangian methods can be applied. One special distributed scheme, called the auxiliary problem principle method, will be studied for distributed ATC assessment in this paper. A computation framework of this distributed algorithm is investigated. System partition with nonoverlapping and boundary sub-systems will also be studied. Simulations of several IEEE test systems will be conducted to validate the feasibility and the correctness of this distributed ATC. In addition, the real-time monitoring and reaction mechanism of this distributed algorithm will also be demonstrated by numerical experiments.

[1]  Le Xie,et al.  Distributed Online Monitoring of Quasi-Static Voltage Collapse in Multi-Area Power Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  F. Alvarado,et al.  Point of collapse methods applied to AC/DC power systems , 1992 .

[3]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[4]  Hua Li,et al.  On-Line ATC Evaluation for Large-Scale Power Systems: Framework and Tool , 2005 .

[5]  G. C. Ejebe,et al.  Available transfer capability calculations , 1998 .

[6]  A. Bakirtzis,et al.  A decentralized solution to the DC-OPF of interconnected power systems , 2003 .

[7]  Hadi Saadat,et al.  Power System Analysis , 1998 .

[8]  I. Dobson Computing a closest bifurcation instability in multidimensional parameter space , 1993 .

[9]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Coarse-grained distributed optimal power flow , 1997 .

[10]  J. Contreras,et al.  Simulation and Evaluation of Optimization Problem Solutions in Distributed Energy Management Systems , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[11]  Liam Murphy,et al.  Parallel and distributed state estimation , 1995 .

[12]  Hsiao-Dong Chiang,et al.  CPFLOW: a practical tool for tracing power system steady-state stationary behavior due to load and generation variations , 1995 .

[13]  Venkataramana Ajjarapu,et al.  The continuation power flow: a tool for steady state voltage stability analysis , 1991 .

[14]  R. Baldick,et al.  State estimation distributed processing [for power systems] , 2000 .

[15]  G. Cohen Auxiliary problem principle and decomposition of optimization problems , 1980 .

[16]  A. Abur,et al.  Total transfer capability computation for multi-area power systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Michael Chertkov,et al.  Optimal Distributed Control of Reactive Power Via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[18]  Timothy C. Green,et al.  Communication Infrastructures for Distributed Control of Power Distribution Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[19]  Shin-Yeu Lin,et al.  A new dual-type method used in solving optimal power flow problems , 1997 .

[20]  G. Irisarri,et al.  Maximum loadability of power systems using interior point nonlinear optimization method , 1997 .

[21]  Shin-Yeu Lin,et al.  Distributed Optimal Power Flow With Discrete Control Variables of Large Distributed Power Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  B. H. Kim,et al.  A comparison of distributed optimal power flow algorithms , 2000 .

[23]  Alfredo Vaccaro,et al.  Pervasive grid for large-scale power systems contingency analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[24]  G. Cohen Optimization by decomposition and coordination: A unified approach , 1978 .