Does ultra-pulse CO2 laser reduce the risk of enamel damage during debonding of ceramic brackets?

This study seeks to evaluate the enamel surface characteristics of teeth after debonding of ceramic brackets with or without laser light. Eighty premolars were bonded with either of the chemically retained or the mechanically retained ceramic brackets and later debonded conventionally or through a CO2 laser (188 W, 400 Hz). The laser was applied for 5 s with scanning movement. After debonding, the adhesive remnant index (ARI), the incidence of bracket and enamel fracture, and the lengths, frequency, and directions of enamel cracks were compared among the groups. The increase in intrapulpal temperature was measured in ten extra specimens. The data were analyzed with SPSS software. There was one case of enamel fracture in the chemical retention/conventional debonding group. When brackets were removed with pliers, incidences of bracket fracture were 45% for the chemical retention, and 15% for the mechanical retention brackets. No case of enamel or bracket fracture was seen in the laser-debonded teeth. A significant difference was observed in ARI scores among the groups. Laser debonding caused a significant decrease in the frequency of enamel cracks, compared to conventional debonding. The increase in intrapulpal temperatures was below the benchmark of 5.5 °C for all the specimens. Laser-assisted debonding of ceramic brackets could reduce the risk of enamel damage and bracket fracture, and produce the more desirable ARI scores without causing thermal damage to the pulp. However, some augmentations in the length and frequency of enamel cracks should be expected with all debonding methods.

[1]  M. Hayashi,et al.  Effects of CO2 Ocean Sequestration on Marine Fish , 2006 .

[2]  J. Mucha,et al.  Assessment of enamel damage after removal of ceramic brackets. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  S. Bishara Ceramic brackets and the need to develop national standards. , 2000, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  M. Ozcan,et al.  Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization. , 2008, European journal of orthodontics.

[5]  L. Winchester Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. , 1991, European journal of orthodontics.

[6]  C. Forsberg,et al.  Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic Brackets with Chemical or Mechanical Retention , 1992, British journal of orthodontics.

[7]  M. Nakata,et al.  Histologic investigation of the human pulp after thermodebonding of metal and ceramic brackets. , 1992, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  Yi-Jane Chen,et al.  Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  Y. Yasuda,et al.  Effects of CO(2) laser debonding of a ceramic bracket on the mechanical properties of enamel. , 2010, Angle Orthodontist.

[10]  F. Heravi,et al.  The effects of bracket removal on enamel. , 2008, Australian orthodontic journal.

[11]  L ZACH,et al.  PULP RESPONSE TO EXTERNALLY APPLIED HEAT. , 1965, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[12]  Didem Nalbantgil,et al.  Debonding of ceramic brackets by a new scanning laser method. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  S. Bishara,et al.  Effects on shear bond strength and the enamel surface with an enamel bonding agent. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  A. D. Viazis,et al.  Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  S. Bishara,et al.  Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets. , 1992, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  J. Warren,et al.  Enamel cracks and ceramic bracket failure during debonding in vitro. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[17]  V. P. Joseph,et al.  The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[18]  Didem Nalbantgil,et al.  Effects of different application durations of ER:YAG laser on intrapulpal temperature change during debonding , 2011, Lasers in Medical Science.

[19]  P. Bendick,et al.  Comparison of wound healing between chopped mode‐superpulse mode CO2 laser and steel knife incision , 1988, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[20]  S. Bishara,et al.  Electrothermal debracketing: patient acceptance and effects on the dental pulp. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[21]  T. Eliades,et al.  Failure mode analysis of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[22]  W. N. Wang,et al.  Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[23]  B. Zachrisson,et al.  Enamel cracks in debonded, debanded, and orthodontically untreated teeth. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.

[24]  S E Bishara,et al.  Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[25]  J F McCabe,et al.  A Critique of Bond Strength Testing in Orthodontics , 1994, British journal of orthodontics.

[26]  Jeff L. Rickabaugh Laser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets , 1994 .

[27]  Kotaro Hayakawa,et al.  Nd: YAG laser for debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[28]  J Artun,et al.  Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. , 1984, American journal of orthodontics.

[29]  Ezz Azzeh,et al.  Laser debonding of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[30]  R. Marangoni,et al.  In vitro comparison of debonding force and intrapulpal temperature changes during ceramic orthodontic bracket removal using a carbon dioxide laser. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[31]  J. Årtun A post-treatment evaluation of multibonded ceramic brackets in orthodontics. , 1997, European journal of orthodontics.

[32]  S. E. Bisharaa Ceramic brackets and the need to develop national standards. , 2000 .

[33]  D. Shieh,et al.  Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[34]  T. Deguchi,et al.  Super pulse CO2 laser for bracket bonding and debonding. , 1999, European journal of orthodontics.

[35]  D P Wood,et al.  Heat generated by grinding during removal of ceramic brackets. , 1991, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[36]  Azita Tehranchi,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of CO2 laser on debonding of orthodontics porcelain brackets vs. the conventional method , 2011, Lasers in Medical Science.