Factors influencing neurotrophic effects of electrical stimulation in the deafened developing auditory system

Research in animal models has demonstrated that electrical stimulation from a cochlear implant (CI) may help prevent degeneration of the cochlear spiral ganglion (SG) neurons after deafness. In cats deafened early in life, effective stimulation of the auditory nerve with complex signals for several months preserves a greater density of SG neurons in the stimulated cochleae as compared to the contralateral deafened ear. However, SG survival is still far from normal even with early intervention with an implant. Thus, pharmacologic agents and neurotrophic factors that might be used in combination with an implant are of great interest. Exogenous administration of GM1 ganglioside significantly reduces SG degeneration in deafened animals studied at 7-8 weeks of age, but after several months of stimulation, GM1-treated animals show only modestly better preservation of SG density compared to age-matched non-treated animals. A significant factor influencing neurotrophic effects in animal models is insertion trauma, which results in significant regional SG degeneration. Thus, an important goal is to further improve human CI electrode designs and insertion techniques to minimize trauma. Another important issue for studies of neurotrophic effects in the developing auditory system is the potential role of critical periods. Studies examining animals deafened at 30 days of age (rather than at birth) have explored whether a brief initial period of normal auditory experience affects the vulnerability of the SG or cochlear nucleus (CN) to auditory deprivation. Interestingly, SG survival in animals deafened at 30-days was not significantly different from age-matched neonatally deafened animals, but significant differences were observed in the central auditory system. CN volume was significantly closer to normal in the animals deafened at 30 days as compared to neonatally deafened animals. However, no difference was observed between the stimulated and contralateral CN volumes in either deafened group. Measurements of AVCN spherical cell somata showed that after later onset of deafness in the 30-day deafened group, mean cell size was significantly closer to normal than in the neonatally deafened group. Further, electrical stimulation elicited a significant increase in spherical cell size in the CN ipsilateral to the implant as compared to the contralateral CN in both deafened groups. Neuronal tracer studies have examined the primary afferent projections from the SG to the CN in neonatally deafened cats. CN projections exhibit a clear cochleotopic organization despite severe auditory deprivation from birth. However, when normalized for the smaller CN size after deafness, projections were 30-50% broader than normal. After unilateral electrical stimulation there was no difference between projections from the stimulated and non-stimulated ears. These findings suggest that early normal auditory experience may be essential for the normal development (or subsequent maintenance) of the topographic precision of SG-to-CN projections. After early deafness, the CN volume is markedly smaller than normal, and the spatial precision of SG projections that underlie frequency resolution in the central auditory system is reduced. Electrical stimulation over several months did not reduce or exacerbate these degenerative changes. If similar principles pertain in the human auditory system, then findings in animal models suggest that the basic cochleotopic organization of neural projections in the central auditory system is probably intact even in congenitally deaf individuals. However, the reduced spatial resolution of the primary afferent projections in our studies suggests that there may be inherent limitations for CI stimulation in congenitally deaf subjects. Spatial (spectral) selectivity of stimulation delivered on adjacent CI channels may be poorer due to the greater overlap of SG central axons representing nearby frequencies. Such CI users may be more dependent upon temporal features of electrical stimuli, and it may be advantageous to enhance the salience of such cues, for example, by removing some electrodes from the processor "map" to reduce channel interaction.

[1]  P. Leake,et al.  Does exogenous GM1 ganglioside enhance the effects of electrical stimulation in ameliorating degeneration after neonatal deafness? , 2001, Hearing Research.

[2]  Edwin W Rubel,et al.  Afferent regulation of neuron number in the cochlear nucleus: Cellular and molecular analyses of a critical period , 2006, Hearing Research.

[3]  R. Ledeen,et al.  Susceptibility of cerebellar granule neurons from GM2/GD2 synthase-null mice to apoptosis induced by glutamate excitotoxicity and elevated KCl: Rescue by GM1 and LIGA20 , 2004, Glycoconjugate Journal.

[4]  P. Leake,et al.  Cochlear pathology induced by aminoglycoside ototoxicity during postnatal maturation in cats , 1997, Hearing Research.

[5]  G. Mower,et al.  Role of visual experience in activating critical period in cat visual cortex. , 1985, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[6]  D. Ryugo,et al.  The Effects of Congenital Deafness on Auditory Nerve Synapses: Type I and Type II Multipolar Cells in the Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus of Cats , 2002, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[7]  Bernd Fritzsch,et al.  Auditory system development: primary auditory neurons and their targets. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Combined Electroacoustic Stimulation in Conventional Candidates for Cochlear Implantation , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[9]  D. Moore,et al.  Projections from the cochlear nucleus to the inferior colliculus in normal and neonatally cochlea‐ablated gerbils , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  D R Moore,et al.  Afferent reorganisation within the superior olivary complex of the gerbil: Development and induction by neonatal, unilateral cochlear removal , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  R. Snyder,et al.  Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  W Singer,et al.  Functional and neuronal binocularity in kittens raised with rapidly alternating monocular occlusion. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Constantine-Paton,et al.  Patterned activity, synaptic convergence, and the NMDA receptor in developing visual pathways. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  K. Kawamoto,et al.  Glial cell line‐derived neurotrophic factor and chronic electrical stimulation prevent VIII cranial nerve degeneration following denervation , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  J. E. Williams,et al.  Development of the dorsal and ventral cochlear nuclei in rat and effects of acoustic deprivation. , 1982, Brain research.

[16]  J. Niparko Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation. , 2004, JAMA.

[17]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  Anatomical Considerations and Long-Term Effects of Electrical Stimulation , 2004 .

[18]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Auditory Prostheses: Past, Present, and Future , 2004 .

[19]  J. Nadol,et al.  Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants? , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[20]  M. Semple,et al.  Development of ectopic projections from the ventral cochlear nucleus to the superior olivary complex induced by neonatal ablation of the contralateral cochlea , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  Ann E Geers,et al.  Will they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe to profound hearing loss. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[22]  J. Coleman,et al.  Age-dependent effects of acoustic deprivation on spherical cells of the rat anteroventral cochlear nucleus , 1983, Experimental Neurology.

[23]  J. Nadol,et al.  Histopathology of the inner ear relevant to cochlear implantation. , 2006, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[24]  D. Trune,et al.  Influence of neonatal cochlear removal on the development of mouse cochlear nucleus: I. Number, size, and density of its neurons , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  J. Horton Disruption of orientation tuning in visual cortex by artificially correlated neuronal activity. , 1997, Survey of ophthalmology.

[26]  R. Snyder,et al.  Degradation of temporal resolution in the auditory midbrain after prolonged deafness is reversed by electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  A. Bachis,et al.  Gangliosides Activate Trk Receptors by Inducing the Release of Neurotrophins* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  J. Virkkala,et al.  Guinea pig auditory neurons are protected by glial cell line-derived growth factor from degeneration after noise trauma , 1998, Hearing Research.

[29]  Mu-ming Poo,et al.  Activity-Dependent Matching of Excitatory and Inhibitory Inputs during Refinement of Visual Receptive Fields , 2005, Neuron.

[30]  M. R. Fighera,et al.  GM1 ganglioside prevents seizures, Na+,K+-ATPase activity inhibition and oxidative stress induced by glutaric acid and pentylenetetrazole , 2006, Neurobiology of Disease.

[31]  D E Mitchell,et al.  Prolonged sensitivity to monocular deprivation in dark-reared cats. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Atsushi Kawano,et al.  Effects of Chronic Electrical Stimulation on Spiral Ganglion Neuron Survival and Size in Deafened Kittens , 1998, The Laryngoscope.

[33]  R. Snyder,et al.  Topography of Auditory Nerve Projections to the Cochlear Nucleus in Cats after Neonatal Deafness and Electrical Stimulation by a Cochlear Implant , 2008, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[34]  J. Coleman,et al.  Effects of monaural and binaural sound deprivation on cell development in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of rats , 1979, Experimental Neurology.

[35]  Patricia A. Leake,et al.  Cochlear pathology of long term neomycin induced deafness in cats , 1988, Hearing Research.

[36]  Ilmari Pyykkö,et al.  Neurotrophic factor intervention restores auditory function in deafened animals , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Robert K Shepherd,et al.  Exogenous BDNF Rescues Rat Spiral Ganglion Neurons In Vivo , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[38]  Darren M. Whiten,et al.  Histopathology of human cochlear implants: Correlation of psychophysical and anatomical measures , 2005, Hearing Research.

[39]  F. O. Black,et al.  Aminoglycoside-induced cochlear pathology in man. , 1981, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[40]  R. Lousteau,et al.  Increased spiral ganglion cell survival in electrically stimulated, deafened guinea pig cochleae , 1987, The Laryngoscope.

[41]  A. Duchemin,et al.  GM1 ganglioside induces phosphorylation and activation of Trk and Erk in brain , 2002, Journal of neurochemistry.

[42]  M. Svirsky,et al.  Development of Language and Speech Perception in Congenitally, Profoundly Deaf Children as a Function of Age at Cochlear Implantation , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[43]  David K Ryugo,et al.  The effects of congenital deafness on auditory nerve synapses and globular bushy cells in cats , 2000, Hearing Research.

[44]  M. Hansen,et al.  Multiple Distinct Signal Pathways, Including an Autocrine Neurotrophic Mechanism, Contribute to the Survival-Promoting Effect of Depolarization on Spiral Ganglion Neurons In Vitro , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: Effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location , 1992, Hearing Research.

[46]  Larsen Sa,et al.  Postnatal maturation of the cat cochlear nuclear complex. , 1984 .

[47]  C. Shatz,et al.  Developmental mechanisms that generate precise patterns of neuronal connectivity , 1993, Cell.

[48]  M. Stroud,et al.  Clinical differentiation of conductive hearing loss , 1978, The Laryngoscope.

[49]  J. Duysens,et al.  Response properties of area 17 neurons in cats reared in stroboscopic illumination. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Robert K Shepherd,et al.  A multichannel scala tympani electrode array incorporating a drug delivery system for chronic intracochlear infusion , 2002, Hearing Research.

[51]  R. Snyder,et al.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation induces selective survival of spiral ganglion neurons in neonatally deafened cats , 1991, Hearing Research.

[52]  D. Webster,et al.  Exogenous GM1 ganglioside effects on conductive and sensorineural hearing losses , 1994, Hearing Research.

[53]  C E Schreiner,et al.  Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  R. Altschuler,et al.  Mechanism of electrical stimulation-induced neuroprotection: effects of verapamil on protection of primary auditory afferents , 2003, Brain Research.

[55]  M. Hansen,et al.  BDNF synthesis in spiral ganglion neurons is constitutive and CREB-dependent , 2001, Hearing Research.

[56]  P. Leake,et al.  Neurotrophic effects of GM1 ganglioside and electrical stimulation on cochlear spiral ganglion neurons in cats deafened as neonates , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[57]  A. Wise,et al.  Resprouting and survival of guinea pig cochlear neurons in response to the administration of the neurotrophins brain‐derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin‐3 , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[58]  Behavioral and Neurophysiological Thresholds for Electrical Cochlear Stimulation in the Deaf Cat , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[59]  W. Tatton,et al.  Reduced apoptosis after nerve growth factor and serum withdrawal: conversion of tetrameric glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase to a dimer. , 2000, Molecular pharmacology.

[60]  W. Gao,et al.  Differential Damage to Auditory Neurons and Hair Cells by Ototoxins and Neuroprotection by Specific Neurotrophins in Rat Cochlear Organotypic Cultures , 1996, The European journal of neuroscience.

[61]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  Changes in the cat cochlear nucleus following neonatal deafening and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation , 1994, Hearing Research.

[62]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  Consequences of chronic extracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats , 1995, Hearing Research.

[63]  L. Svennerholm,et al.  Gangliosides--a new therapeutic agent against stroke and Alzheimer's disease. , 1994, Life sciences.

[64]  R. Altschuler,et al.  Delayed neurotrophin treatment following deafness rescues spiral ganglion cells from death and promotes regrowth of auditory nerve peripheral processes: Effects of brain‐derived neurotrophic factor and fibroblast growth factor , 2007, Journal of neuroscience research.

[65]  J. Obeso,et al.  Neuronal death and Parkinson's disease , 1999 .

[66]  M. Weliky,et al.  Synaptic Modification by Vision , 2003, Science.

[67]  Douglas B. Webster,et al.  Late onset of auditory deprivation does not affect brainstem auditory neuron soma size , 1983, Hearing Research.

[68]  I. Hochmair,et al.  Cochlear Implants : State of the Art and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2006 .

[69]  B Malgrange,et al.  NT‐3 and/or BDNF therapy prevents loss of auditory neurons following loss of hair cells , 1996, Neuroreport.

[70]  Bernd Fritzsch,et al.  Making and breaking the innervation of the ear: neurotrophic support during ear development and its clinical implications , 1999, Cell and Tissue Research.

[71]  J. Eggermont,et al.  Auditory system plasticity in children after long periods of complete deafness , 1996, Neuroreport.

[72]  S. Korsching,et al.  The neurotrophic factor concept: a reexamination , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[73]  R. Snyder,et al.  Neonatal deafness results in degraded topographic specificity of auditory nerve projections to the cochlear nucleus in cats , 2006, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[74]  J. Fayad,et al.  Multichannel Cochlear Implants: Relation of Histopathology to Performance , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[75]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  Design and fabrication of multichannel cochlear implants for animal research , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[76]  Paul Kruszka,et al.  Neurotrophins can enhance spiral ganglion cell survival after inner hair cell loss , 1997, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience.

[77]  R R Stewart,et al.  Neurotrophin-4/5 enhances survival of cultured spiral ganglion neurons and protects them from cisplatin neurotoxicity , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[78]  I Fariñas,et al.  Spatial Shaping of Cochlear Innervation by Temporally Regulated Neurotrophin Expression , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[79]  H. Gladstone,et al.  Enhanced preservation of the auditory nerve following cochlear perfusion with nerve growth factors. , 1995, The American journal of otology.

[80]  W. Tatton Modulation of gene expression rather than monoamine oxidase inhibition , 1996, Neurology.

[81]  C. Shatz Emergence of order in visual system development. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  R. Ruben Unsolved issues around critical periods with emphasis on clinical application. , 1986, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[83]  Sho Kanzaki,et al.  Spiral Ganglion Neurons Are Protected from Degeneration by GDNF Gene Therapy , 2000, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[84]  R. Ledeen,et al.  Presence of Sodium–Calcium Exchanger/GM1 Complex in the Nuclear Envelope of Non-neural Cells: Nature of Exchanger-GM1 Interaction , 2004, Neurochemical Research.

[85]  J. Schmidt,et al.  Activity sharpens the regenerating retinotectal projection in goldfish: sensitive period for strobe illumination and lack of effect on synaptogenesis and on ganglion cell receptive field properties. , 1988, Journal of neurobiology.

[86]  Jifeng Li,et al.  GM1 ganglioside prevented the decline of hippocampal neurogenesis associated with D-galactose , 2005, Neuroreport.

[87]  J M Miller,et al.  Effectiveness of different electrical stimulation conditions in preservation of spiral ganglion cells following deafness. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[88]  F. Geisler GM-1 ganglioside and motor recovery following human spinal cord injury. , 1993, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[89]  M. Poo,et al.  Reversal and Stabilization of Synaptic Modifications in a Developing Visual System , 2003, Science.

[90]  Bruce J. Gantz,et al.  Combined acoustic and electric hearing: Preserving residual acoustic hearing , 2008, Hearing Research.

[91]  Susan B. Waltzman,et al.  3 Consequences of Deafness and Electrical Stimulation on the Peripheral and Central Auditory System , 2006 .

[92]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Cochlear Implantation in Adults with Prelingual Deafness. Part I. Clinical Results , 2004, The Laryngoscope.

[93]  R. Altschuler,et al.  Protective Effect of Electrical Stimulation in the Deafened Guinea Pig Cochlea , 1991, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[94]  Jie Huang,et al.  Prosurvival and proapoptotic intracellular signaling in rat spiral ganglion neurons in vivo after the loss of hair cells , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[95]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Prelingual Deafness. Part II. Underlying Constraints That Affect Audiological Outcomes , 2004, The Laryngoscope.

[96]  E. Javel,et al.  Development of auditory-evoked potentials in the cat. I. Onset of response and development of sensitivity. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[97]  R. Briggs,et al.  Communication Development in Children Who Receive the Cochlear Implant Younger than 12 Months: Risks versus Benefits , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[98]  T. Lenarz,et al.  Technical Report: Modification of a Cochlear Implant Electrode for Drug Delivery to the Inner Ear , 2003, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[99]  A. Bachis,et al.  Semisynthetic sphingoglycolipid LIGA20 is neuroprotective against human immunodeficiency virus‐gp120‐mediated apoptosis , 2006, Journal of neuroscience research.

[100]  M. Meyenhofer,et al.  Enhanced Susceptibility to Kainate-Induced Seizures, Neuronal Apoptosis, and Death in Mice Lacking Gangliotetraose Gangliosides: Protection with LIGA 20, a Membrane-Permeant Analog of GM1 , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[101]  Critical periods in auditory development. The Netherlands, April 22-23, 1985. , 1986, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[102]  G. M. Clark,et al.  Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II deafened kittens , 1994, Hearing Research.

[103]  J. Niparko,et al.  Restoration of Auditory Nerve Synapses in Cats by Cochlear Implants , 2005, Science.

[104]  E. Rubel,et al.  Afferent regulation of neurons in the brain stem auditory system. , 1990, Journal of neurobiology.

[105]  F. Werblin,et al.  Requirement for Cholinergic Synaptic Transmission in the Propagation of Spontaneous Retinal Waves , 1996, Science.

[106]  Olga A. Stakhovskaya,et al.  Effects of age at onset of deafness and electrical stimulation on the developing cochlear nucleus in cats , 2008, Hearing Research.

[107]  G. M. Clark,et al.  Changes in Synthetic and Natural Vowel Perception after Specific Training for Congenitally Deafened Patients Using a Multichannel Cochlear Implant , 1997, Ear and Hearing.

[108]  D B Moody,et al.  The patas monkey as a model for dihydrostreptomycin ototoxicity. , 1977, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[109]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Language Development in Profoundly Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants , 2000, Psychological science.

[110]  D. Webster,et al.  Neonatal sound deprivation affects brain stem auditory nuclei. , 1977, Archives of otolaryngology.

[111]  D R Moore,et al.  Auditory brainstem of the ferret: Effects of unilateral cochlear lesions on cochlear nucleus volume and projections to the inferior colliculus , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[112]  R. Ruben,et al.  Plasticity of the Developing Auditory System , 1980, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[113]  D. Webster Conductive hearing loss affects the growth of the cochlear nuclei over an extended period of time , 1988, Hearing Research.

[114]  Thomas R. Van De Water,et al.  Brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene therapy prevents spiral ganglion degeneration after hair cell loss , 1998, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[115]  J-L Zheng,et al.  Neurotrophin-4/5 (NT-4/5) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) act at later stages of cerebellar granule cell differentiation , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[116]  Robert K. Shepherd,et al.  Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons? , 2007, Hearing Research.

[117]  Donald K. Eddington,et al.  Histopathology of Cochlear Implants in Humans , 2001, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[118]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in deaf kittens: Effects on cochlear nucleus morphology , 1991, Hearing Research.

[119]  Andrew K. Wise,et al.  Neurotrophic Factors and Neural Prostheses: Potential Clinical Applications Based Upon Findings in the Auditory System , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[120]  A. Kay,et al.  Trophic Support of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons by Depolarization Exceeds and Is Additive with that by Neurotrophins or cAMP and Requires Elevation of [Ca2+]i within a Set Range , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[121]  J Ylikoski,et al.  Correlative studies on the cochlear pathology and hearing loss in guinea-pigs after intoxication with ototoxic antibiotics. , 1974, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[122]  A. Guidotti,et al.  LIGA20, a lyso derivative of ganglioside GM1, given orally after cortical thrombosis reduces infarct size and associated cognition deficit. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[123]  J. Niparko,et al.  Ultrastructural analysis of primary endings in deaf white cats: Morphologic alterations in endbulbs of held , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[124]  Patricia A. Leake,et al.  Frequency Map for the Human Cochlear Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Cochlear Implants , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[125]  Molly Webster,et al.  Effects of Neonatal Conductive Hearing Loss on Brain Stem Auditory Nuclei , 1979, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[126]  R. Snyder,et al.  Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[127]  H. Spoendlin,et al.  Retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve. , 1975, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[128]  Barbara Canlon,et al.  Protection of auditory neurons from aminoglycoside toxicity by neurotrophin-3 , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[129]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Development of topographic order in the mammalian retinocollicular projection , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[130]  H. Killackey,et al.  Ascending projections to the inferior colliculus following unilateral cochlear ablation in the neonatal gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[131]  Li Li,et al.  Does electrical stimulation of deaf cochleae prevent spiral ganglion degeneration? , 1999, Hearing Research.

[132]  E. Javel,et al.  Development of auditory-evoked potentials in the cat. III. Wave amplitudes. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[133]  Stephanie B. Epp,et al.  Chronic depolarization enhances the trophic effects of brain‐derived neurotrophic factor in rescuing auditory neurons following a sensorineural hearing loss , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[134]  Lisa N Gillespie,et al.  BDNF‐induced survival of auditory neurons in vivo: Cessation of treatment leads to accelerated loss of survival effects , 2003, Journal of neuroscience research.

[135]  Maike Vollmer,et al.  Plasticity in central representations in the inferior colliculus induced by chronic single- vs. two-channel electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant after neonatal deafness , 2000, Hearing Research.

[136]  Harold F. Schuknecht,et al.  GANGLION CELL POPULATION IN NORMAL AND PATHOLOGICAL HUMAN COCHLEA , 1978 .

[137]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Residual Hearing Conservation and Electroacoustic Stimulation with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance Cochlear Implant , 2006, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[138]  A. Bachis,et al.  Gangliosides prevent excitotoxicity through activation of TrkB receptor , 2002, Neurotoxicity Research.