Risk analysis and big data

Abstract Big Data can help overcome various problems that exist in present risk analysis practices. By analysing systems as a whole, it is no longer necessary to define in advance what a failure is and what a success is. It is also possible to evaluate how factors that are considered to promote success can combine into catastrophic failures. Big in Big Data is relative. What was called big data 25 years ago is now called small. The continuous development of analysis techniques over the years have resulted in several operational models that use the concept of Big Data. They will become better as the technology and the accessibility of data further improves. With this new generation of systems models, accidents and incidents do not have to wait for analysis to after the fact. They can be studied beforehand in a model. Replacing hindsight by foresight can help to make the world safer, if we desire to do so.

[1]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Further development of a causal model for air transport safety (CATS) : the complete model , 2008 .

[2]  M. G. Zabetakis,et al.  DETONATION OF A FLAMMABLE CLOUD FOLLOWING A PROPANE PIPELINE BREAK--THE DECEMBER 9, 1970, EXPLOSION IN PORT HUDSON, MO. , 1973 .

[3]  B. Ale,et al.  Accumulation of environmental risks to human health: geographical differences in the Netherlands , 1998 .

[4]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Non-Parametric Continuous Bayesian Belief Nets with Expert Judgement , 2004 .

[5]  Ioannis A. Papazoglou,et al.  Storybuilder - A tool for the analysis of accident reports , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Dorota Kurowicka,et al.  Analysis of the crash of TK 1951 using CATS , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  Safety I and Safety II , 2014 .

[8]  Mark S. Young,et al.  The Field Guide to Understanding Human Error , 2008 .

[9]  J. Van den Top Modelling Risk Control Measures in Railways: Analysing how designers and operators organise safe rail traffic , 2010 .

[10]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Big data: From beginning to future , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[11]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[12]  Nassim Nicholas Taleb,et al.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2007 .

[13]  Urban Kjellén,et al.  Reducing risks by deviation control—a retrospection into a research strategy , 1993 .

[14]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Big Data , 2014, Wirtschaftsinf..

[15]  N. W. Hurst,et al.  A classification scheme for pipework failures to include human and sociotechnical errors and their contribution to pipework failure frequencies , 1991 .

[16]  D. Mccormick Normal Accidents , 1991, Bio/Technology.

[17]  明哲 小松原,et al.  人的多重防護を巡って : Resilience Engineeringの観点から , 2007 .

[18]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Further development of a Causal model for Air Transport Safety (CATS): Building the mathematical heart , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Development of a Causal Model for Air Transport Safety , 2005 .