ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF AN ARCHICORTICAL NEURON

The detailed understanding of the electrophysiology of central neurons derives primarily from the extensive intracellular microelectrode studies of the spinal motoneuron.2*13*14.19~22 ,39,66 The important model derived from these investigations has already proved applicable to the neurons of a variety of submammalian species: the supramedullary cell of the p ~ f f e r f i s h , ~ . ~ the giant ganglion cell of A f i l y ~ i a , ~ ~ ~ ~ and the sensoryneuron of the crayfish.'* By contrast, the test of the motoneuron model in mammals has been largely limited to other nerve cells of the spinal cord (for example, Clarke's column and interneurons) .'I .26 In particular there is a paucity of information about cortical neurons. It is indeed difficult to obtain intracellular recordings in the mammalian cortex due, in large part, to the small size of most cortical cells and to brain pulsation. The present series of investigations received their impetus from Phillips' success in impaling the neocortical Betz By activating these cells antidromically, Phillips was able to show that the steps in the production of the antidromic spike were similar to those in the spinal motoneuron. He demonstrated further that excitation occurred with depolarization and inhibition with hyperpolarization. Since the Betz cell is an unusually large-sized and fairly specialized neocortical motor cell, it seemed advantageous to test the motoneuron model on another cell that is both morphologically and functionally different. The hippocampal pyramidal cell was selected for study because it is a more typically correlational neuron, that is, it does not have specific motor or sensory functions and it is part of the archirather than the neocortex. The hippocampus is a particularly favorable cortex for single unit analysis. I t is directly accessible following suction removal of the overlying part of the hemisphere. Therefore gross stimulating and recording electrodes can be placed under direct vision on various portions of the exposed archicortex. The absence of pial covering permits multiple electrode penetrations to be made rapidly and easily. The relative simplicity of the cellular architecture and its constancy throughout the mammalian class have traditionally attracted the attention of morphologists. Consequently the anatomy and hodology of the hippocampus are particularly well described.'*3s~40~45-46 The somata of the primary neurons, the pyramidal cells, are clustered in a tightly packed layer (FIGURE la). These neurons send their axons into alveus, fimbria, and fornix, an outflow tract that is readily accessible for stimulation (FIGURE l b ) . The pyramidal cell can therefore be activated antidromically and identified electrophysiologically. There are also available two orthodromic pathways to the pyramidal cells and an extensive system of recurrent collaterals.

[1]  H. Jasper,et al.  Microelectrode studies of the electrical activity of the cerebral cortex in the cat * , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  G. Svaetichin Component analysis of action potentials from single neurons. , 1958, Experimental cell research.

[3]  M. Fuortes,et al.  Potentials recorded from the spinal cord with microelectrodes , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  M. Fuortes,et al.  Stimulation of spinal motoneurones with intracellular electrodes , 1956, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  W. Ashby,et al.  The Neurophysiological Basis of Mind , 1953 .

[6]  J. Eccles,et al.  Intracellular recording from cells in Clarke's column. , 1958, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[7]  K. Pribram,et al.  Electrocorticographic effects of stimulation of posterior orbital, temporal and cingulate areas of Macaca mulatta. , 1950, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  P. Fatt,et al.  Sequence of events in synaptic activation of a motoneurone. , 1957, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  C. G. Phillips,et al.  Intracellular records from Betz cells in the cat. , 1956, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[10]  |. O. Ødegard [Recent progress in psychiatry]. , 1953, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[11]  B LIBET,et al.  The behaviour of chromatolysed motoneurones studied by intracellular recording , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  T. Araki,et al.  Response of single motoneurons to direct stimulation in toad's spinal cord. , 1955, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Eccles,et al.  The specific ionic conductances and the ionic movements across the motoneuronal membrane that produce the inhibitory post‐synaptic potential , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  E. Kandel,et al.  Excitation and inhibition of single pyramidal cells during hippocampal seizure. , 1961, Experimental neurology.

[15]  E. Kandel,et al.  ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY OF HIPPOCAMPAL NEURONS: IV. FAST PREPOTENTIALS. , 1961, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  A. F. Bak A unity gain cathode follower. , 1958, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  L. Tauc,et al.  Processus post-synaptiques d'excitation et d'inhibition dans le soma neuronique de l'aplysie et de l'escargot , 1958 .

[18]  T. Powell,et al.  STUDIES OF THE CONNEXIONS OF THE FORNIX SYSTEM , 1954, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  W. Smith The Integrative Action of the Nervous System , 1907, Nature.

[20]  J. Eccles,et al.  The interpretation of spike potentials of motoneurones , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  R. Eccles Intracellular potentials recorded from a mammalian sympathetic ganglion , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  F. Gibbs,et al.  THE CONVULSION THRESHOLD OF VARIOUS PARTS OF THE CAT'S BRAIN , 1936 .

[23]  E. Kandel,et al.  Electrophysiology of hippocampal neurons. I. Sequential invasion and synaptic organization. , 1961, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  M. Ito The electrical activity of spinal ganglion cells investigated with intracellular microelectrodes. , 1957, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[25]  W. Scoville,et al.  Stimulation studies of the prefrontal lobe and uncus in man. , 1951, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  The dual effect of membrane potential on sodium conductance in the giant axon of Loligo , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  C. G. Phillips Cortical motor threshold and the thresholds and distribution of excited Betz cells in the cat. , 1956, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[28]  J. M. Brookhart,et al.  Antidromic and synaptic activation of frog motor neurons. , 1959, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  E. Kandel,et al.  Electrophysiology of hippocampal neurons. II. After-potentials and repetitive firing. , 1961, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  W. Cowan,et al.  An experimental study of the efferent connexions of the hippocampus. , 1955, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  D. Ottoson,et al.  The site of impulse initiation in a nerve cell of a crustacean stretch receptor , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  M. Fuortes,et al.  STEPS IN THE PRODUCTION OF MOTONEURON SPIKES , 1957, The Journal of general physiology.

[33]  W. Nauta,et al.  Hippocampal projections and related neural pathways to the midbrain in the cat. , 1958, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  E. Kandel,et al.  ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY OF HIPPOCAMPAL NEURONS: III. FIRING LEVEL AND TIME CONSTANT. , 1961, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  C. Brooks Studies on the Cerebral Cortex , 1933 .

[36]  E. Kandel,et al.  Hippocampal neuron responses to selective activation of recurrent collaterals of hippocampofugal axons , 1961 .

[37]  C. Hunt,et al.  Properties of spinal interneurones , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  B. Kaada Somato-motor, autonomic and electrocorticographic responses to electrical stimulation of rhinencephalic and other structures in primates, cat, and dog; a study of responses from the limbic, subcallosal, orbito-insular, piriform and temporal cortex, hippocampus-fornix and amygdala. , 1951, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[39]  Sholl Da Dendritic organization in the neurons of the visual and motor cortices of the cat. , 1953 .

[40]  S. Crain Resting and action potentials of cultured chick embryo spinal ganglion cells , 1956, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[41]  M. Bennett,et al.  Electrophysiology of supramedullary neurons in Spheroides maculatus. II. Properties of the electrically excitable membrane. , 1959 .

[42]  C. Branch,et al.  Inhibition of Betz cell activity by thalamic and cortical stimulation. , 1958, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  C. G. Phillips,et al.  Actions of antidromic pyramidal volleys on single Betz cells in the cat. , 1959, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.