Registration of plantar pressure images.

In this work, five computational methodologies to register plantar pressure images are compared: (1) the first methodology is based on matching the external contours of the feet; (2) the second uses the phase correlation technique; (3) the third addresses the direct maximization of cross-correlation using the Fourier transform; (4) the fourth minimizes the sum of squared differences using the Fourier transform; and (5) the fifth methodology iteratively optimizes an intensity (dis)similarity measure based on Powell's method. The accuracy and robustness of the five methodologies were assessed by using images from three common plantar pressure acquisition devices: a Footscan system, an EMED system, and a light reflection system. Using the residual error as a measure of accuracy, all methodologies revealed to be very accurate even in the presence of noise. The most accurate was the methodology based on the iterative optimization, when the mean squared error was minimized. It achieved a residual error inferior to 0.01 mm and 0.6 mm for non-noisy and noisy images, respectively. On the other hand, the methodology based on image contour matching was the fastest, but its accuracy was the lowest.

[1]  J. Duysens,et al.  A new method to normalize plantar pressure measurements for foot size and foot progression angle. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Todd C Pataky,et al.  Pedobarographic statistical parametric mapping (pSPM): a pixel-level approach to foot pressure image analysis. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  João Manuel R S Tavares,et al.  Towards an efficient and robust foot classification from pedobarographic images , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[4]  João Manuel R. S. Tavares,et al.  Novel framework for registration of pedobarographic image data , 2010, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[5]  David R. Haynor,et al.  PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  A J Harrison,et al.  A moment-based technique for the automatic spatial alignment of plantar pressure data , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[7]  M. Unser,et al.  Interpolation revisited [medical images application] , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  C. Morandi,et al.  Registration of Translated and Rotated Images Using Finite Fourier Transforms , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Plantar pressure distribution measurements. Technical background and clinical applications , 1997 .

[10]  Cheng-Chang Lu,et al.  Medical image registration by maximization of mutual information , 2003 .

[11]  João Manuel R S Tavares,et al.  Rapid pedobarographic image registration based on contour curvature and optimization. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Francisco P. M. Oliveira,et al.  Algorithm of Dynamic Programming for Optimization of the Global Matching between Two Contours Defined by Ordered Points , 2008 .

[13]  T. McPoil,et al.  Plantar pressure assessment. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[14]  João Manuel R. S. Tavares,et al.  Matching image objects in dynamic pedobarography , 2000 .

[15]  Paul K. Commean,et al.  Multi-plug insole design to reduce peak plantar pressure on the diabetic foot during walking , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[16]  J. Y. Goulermas,et al.  New insights into the plantar pressure correlates of walking speed using pedobarographic statistical parametric mapping (pSPM). , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C++: The Art of Scientific Computing (2nd edn)1 Numerical Recipes Example Book (C++) (2nd edn)2 Numerical Recipes Multi-Language Code CD ROM with LINUX or UNIX Single-Screen License Revised Version3 , 2003 .

[18]  J. Y. Goulermas,et al.  A comparison of seven methods of within-subjects rigid-body pedobarographic image registration. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[20]  Francisco P.M. Oliveira,et al.  Registration of pedobarographic image data in the frequency domain , 2010, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[21]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  João Manuel R. S. Tavares,et al.  Improvement of Modal Matching Image Objects in Dynamic Pedobarography using Optimization Techniques , 2005 .

[23]  João Manuel R. S. Tavares,et al.  Improvement of Modal Matching Image Objects in Dynamic Pedobarography Using Optimization Techniques , 2004, AMDO.

[24]  João Manuel R. S. Tavares,et al.  Dynamic Pedobarography Transitional Objects by Lagrange's Equation with FEM, Modal Matching, and Optimization Techniques , 2004, ICIAR.