Detection of articular cartilage lesions: Experimental evaluation of low‐ and high‐field‐strength MR imaging at 0.18 and 1.0 T

The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of a dedicated orthopedic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging system (0.18 T) and a conventional MR imaging system (1.0 T) in the detection of articular cartilage lesions. Fifty knee joint specimens of pigs with artificially created articular cartilage lesions of different diameters, grades (2–3), and localizations, as well as 50 joints with intact articular cartilage, were imaged at 0.18 and 1.0 T. Diagnostic performance was determined by means of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis with three independent observers. For none of the pulse sequences used at 0.18 T or 1.0 T areas under ROC curves (Az) showed significant differences between the three observers. Az values from averaged data were as follows: a) 0.18 T: T1‐weighted spin echo (SE): 0.70, proton‐density‐weighted SE: 0.59, T2‐weighted SE: 0.61, two‐dimensional (2D) gradient‐echo (GRE): 0.73, 3D GRE: 0.75; and b) 1.0 T: T1‐weighted SE: 0.73, fat‐suppressed T2‐weighted turbo‐SE: 0.79, 2D fast low‐angle shot (FLASH): 0.79, fat‐suppressed 3D FLASH: 0.96, and water‐excited 3D double‐echo steady state (DESS): 0.96. With the use of 3D pulse sequences, the high‐field system demonstrated a significantly better diagnostic performance than the low‐field system in the detection of grades 2 and 3 articular cartilage lesions (P < 0.001). J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;11:678–685. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  D W Piraino,et al.  Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. , 1996, Radiology.

[2]  J Romero,et al.  MRI of patellar articular cartilage: Evaluation of an optimized gradient‐echo sequence (3D‐DESS) , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  B K Rutt,et al.  The impact of field strength on image quality in MRI , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  H K Genant,et al.  MR imaging of the arthritic knee: improved discrimination of cartilage, synovium, and effusion with pulsed saturation transfer and fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences. , 1994, Radiology.

[5]  C. Metz.  ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[6]  T. McCauley,et al.  Chondromalacia patellae: diagnosis with MR imaging. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  I. Tulikoura,et al.  Diagnostic performance of low field MRI in acute knee injuries. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  D W Piraino,et al.  Fat suppressed MRI of articular cartilage with a spatial‐spectral excitation pulse , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  W. F. Conway,et al.  Patellar cartilage lesions: in vitro detection and staging with MR imaging and pathologic correlation. , 1990, Radiology.

[10]  D G Disler,et al.  Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  C C Glüer,et al.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. , 1994, Radiology.

[12]  J A Frank,et al.  Magnetization transfer contrast: MR imaging of the knee. , 1991, Radiology.

[13]  V. Chandnani,et al.  Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High resolution MRI of small joints: impact of spatial resolution on diagnostic performance and SNR. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  M. Barnett.  MR diagnosis of internal derangements of the knee: effect of field strength on efficacy. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  W G Bradley.  Future cost‐effective MRI will be at high field , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  P Rothschild,et al.  Accessible magnetic resonance imaging. , 1989, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[18]  D G Disler,et al.  Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  D Resnick,et al.  Knee Joint Hyaline Cartilage Defects: A Comparative Study of MR and Anatomic Sections , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  P. Parizel,et al.  Low-field versus high-field MR imaging of the knee: a comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance. , 1995, European journal of radiology.

[21]  A. Amendola,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament tear: prospective evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of middle- and high-field-strength MR imaging at 1.5 and 0.5 T. , 1995, Radiology.

[22]  M. Kormano,et al.  MR equipment acquisition strategies: low-field or high-field scanners , 1997, European Radiology.

[23]  F. Noyes,et al.  A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[24]  D Resnick,et al.  MR imaging of articular cartilage: current status and future directions. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  M. Rominger,et al.  Vergleich von verschiedenen MRT-Techniken in der Diagnose von degenerativen Knorpelerkrankungen - In-vitro-Studie an 50 Gelenkpräparaten des Knies bei 1,5 T , 1997 .

[26]  David Thomasson,et al.  Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free‐precession sequence for imaging cartilage , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  L. Frank,et al.  Evaluation of patellar cartilage in cadavers with a low-field-strength extremity-only magnet: comparison of MR imaging sequences, with macroscopic findings as the standard. , 1998, Radiology.

[28]  L. Kaufman,et al.  MR imaging of the knee with a 0.064-T permanent magnet. , 1990, Radiology.

[29]  H K Genant,et al.  Emerging applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of articular cartilage. , 1996, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[30]  P Gerhardt,et al.  [MRI of the knee joint: first results of a comparison of 0,2-T specialized system and 1,5-T high field strength magnet]. , 1995, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[31]  H. Genant,et al.  Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  H. Potter,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage in the Knee. An Evaluation with Use of Fast-Spin-Echo Imaging* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  D Resnick,et al.  Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. , 1993, Radiology.