Actor-network theory and the evolution of complex adaptive supply networks

Purpose Current understandings of innovation in construction portray it as linear, deterministic phenomena centered around novel objects and technologies deployed in sequentially-organized supply chains. This study aims to develop an enriched understanding of construction innovation as non-linear, socio-material and dynamic phenomena in complex networks by formulating a novel conceptual apparatus of complex adaptive supply networks (CASNs) expanded through actor-network theory (ANT) concepts. Design/methodology/approach This combined CASN/ANT apparatus is mobilized in the context of a qualitative case study involving a housing construction supply network in Australia making use of offsite manufacturing (OSM) techniques. Findings The study shows that innovative technologies such as novel OSM products can play an important though not necessarily deterministic role in the evolution of CASNs. The study also explicates the process by which the enrollment of non-human agents and the resulting CASN evolution are linked: innovative technologies shape human and non-human interactions in ways that redefine task delegation, role definition and schemas that are fundamental to the shape of CASNs. Originality/value Findings provide a compelling empirical basis for arguing that CASNs must be conceptualized as heterogeneous systems and that innovation in construction must be understood as non-linear, socio-material and dynamic, rather than linear and driven by technological determinism. The study also interrogates limiting notions of supply chains and supports the notion of alternative inter-organizational forms to understand construction project work.

[1]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[2]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[3]  Marianne Jahre,et al.  Supply chain management – back to the future? , 2006 .

[4]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence , 2001 .

[5]  Chris Harty,et al.  Diffusion of digital innovation in construction: a case study of a UK engineering firm , 2015 .

[6]  Marianne Jahre,et al.  A critical discussion of models for conceptualizing the economic logic of construction , 2013 .

[7]  Ina Drejer Identifying innovation in surveys of services: A Schumpeterian perspective , 2004 .

[8]  Chris Harty,et al.  Implementing innovation in construction: contexts, relative boundedness and actor‐network theory , 2008 .

[9]  M. Callon Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[10]  M. Callon The role of hybrid communities and socio-technical arrangements in the participatory design , 2004 .

[11]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[12]  Martin Sexton,et al.  Appropriate innovation in small construction firms , 2003 .

[13]  John Yen,et al.  Introduction , 2004, CACM.

[14]  B. Latour Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[15]  J. Law After Ant: Complexity, Naming and Topology , 1999 .

[16]  Michel Callon,et al.  STRUGGLES AND NEGOTIATIONS TO DEFINE WHAT IS PROBLEMA TIC AND WHAT IS NOT The Socia-logic of Translation * , 1980 .

[17]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[18]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Artifacts that organize: Delegation in the distributed organization , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[19]  Louise Young,et al.  On cooperating: firms, relations and networks☆ , 2002 .

[20]  Malena Ingemansson,et al.  The Logic of Innovation in Construction , 2014 .

[21]  Tracy Cooke,et al.  Designing for construction workers’ occupational health and safety: a case study of socio-material complexity , 2012 .

[22]  Michael Rosen COMING TO TERMS WITH THE FIELD: UNDERSTANDING AND DOING ORGANIZATIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY* , 1991 .

[23]  Bill Doolin,et al.  To reveal is to critique: actor–network theory and critical information systems research , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Chris Harty,et al.  Implementing ‘Site BIM’: A case study of ICT innovation on a large hospital project , 2013 .

[25]  Thomas A. Schwandt,et al.  Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation , 2007 .

[26]  B. Lundvall Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations, Networks and Systems National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool , 2022 .

[27]  A. Dainty A call for methodological pluralism in built environment research , 2007 .

[28]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .