Performance limitations and error calculations for parameter estimation

Error calculations cannot be carried out precisely when parameters are estimated which affect the observation nonlinearly. This paper summarizes the available approaches to studying performance and compares the resulting answers for a specific case. It is shown that the familiar Cramer-Rao lower bound on rms error yields an accurate answer only for large signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). For low SNR, lower bounds on rms error obtained by Ziv and Zakai give easily calculated and fairly tight answers. Rate distortion theory gives a lower bound on the error achievable with any system. The Barankin lower bound does not appear to give useful information as a computational tool. A technique for approximating the error can be used effectively for a large class of systems. With numerical integration, an upper bound obtained by Seidman gives a fairly tight answer. Recent work by Ziv gives bounds on the bias of estimators but, in general, these appear to be rather weak. Tighter results are obtained for maximum-likelihood estimators with certain symmetry conditions. Applying these techniques makes it possible to locate the threshold level to within a few decibels of channel signal-to-noise ratio. Further, these calculations can be easily carried out for any system.

[1]  E. Barankin Locally Best Unbiased Estimates , 1949 .

[2]  J. Kiefer On Minimum Variance Estimators , 1952 .

[3]  Frank W. Lehan,et al.  Telemetering and information theory , 1954, Transactions of the IRE Professional Group on Radio Telemetry and Remote Control.

[4]  John J. Gart,et al.  An Extension of the Cramer-Rao Inequality , 1959 .

[5]  P. Swerling Parameter Estimation for Waveforms in Additive Gaussian Noise , 1959 .

[6]  Hiroshi Akima Theoretical Studies on Signal-to-Noise Characteristics of an FM System , 1963, IEEE Transactions on Space Electronics and Telemetry.

[7]  F. C. Schweppe,et al.  On the angular resolution of multiple targets , 1964 .

[8]  I. M. Jacobs,et al.  Principles of Communication Engineering , 1965 .

[9]  Lawrence P. Seidman,et al.  An upper bound on average estimation error in nonlinear systems , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Jacob Ziv,et al.  Some lower bounds on signal parameter estimation , 1969, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  L. Seidman A Class of Signals for Analog Telemetry over a Coherent Channel , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  Lawrence P. Seidman,et al.  A useful form of the Barankin lower bound and its application to PPM threshold analysis , 1969, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  M. T. Wasan Stochastic Approximation , 1969 .

[14]  R. McAulay,et al.  A PPM/PM Hybrid Modulation System , 1969 .

[15]  J. Ziv Bounds on the bias of signal parameter estimators , 1969 .

[16]  Edward M Hofstetter,et al.  BARANKIN BOUNDS ON PARAMETER ESTIMATION ACCURACY APPLIED TO COMMUNICATIONS AND RADAR PROBLEMS , 1969 .

[17]  L. Seidman The Performance of a PPM/PM Hybrid Modulation System , 1970 .