Attitudes associated with behavioral predictors of serious road traffic crashes: results from the GAZEL cohort

Objectives: To test the hypothesis that behavioral predictors of serious road traffic crashes (RTC) are correlated with unfavorable attitudes towards traffic safety. Design: Prospective and cross-sectional cohort study. Setting: France Participants: 13 447 of the 19 894 living members of the GAZEL cohort, workers and recent retirees of a French national utility company followed up since 1989. Main outcomes measures: Driving behavior and attitudes towards traffic safety in 2001 by questionnaire. Serious RTCs were recorded over the subsequent 3 years using the cohort annual questionnaire. Behavioral predictors of serious RTCs were assessed using generalized linear Poisson regression models with time-dependent covariates. Factor scores extracted from the first four attitudinal factors of principal component analysis were saved and then regressed on behavioral predictors as independent variables. Results: After controlling for potential confounders, the best predictors of serious RTCs were: “exceeding speed limits on rural roads”, “risky use of cellular phone”, and “sleepy driving”. The adjusted rate ratio ranged from 1.47 to 2.16. Predictors of contravention of the highway code (the first two predictors) were found to be strongly associated with negative attitudes towards “enforcement” and “speed limitations” with an adjusted odds ratio ranging from 1.31 to 2.02. Conclusion: Our study supports the view that individuals with a high propensity for driving behaviors associated with an increased risk of RTCs were more likely to have negative attitudes towards traffic safety. Changing drivers’ negative or distorted opinions of traffic “enforcement” as well as “speed limitations” and “alcohol prohibition on roads” could improve their compliance with road traffic rules.

[1]  S Stradling,et al.  Behavioural characteristics and involvement in different types of traffic accident. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  D. Fergusson,et al.  Risky driving behaviour in young people: prevalence, personal characteristics and traffic accidents , 2003, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[3]  Girma Berhanu,et al.  Models relating traffic safety with road environment and traffic flows on arterial roads in Addis Ababa. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Traffic-law enforcement and risk of death from motor-vehicle crashes: case-crossover study , 2003, The Lancet.

[5]  L. Evans,et al.  The dominant role of driver behavior in traffic safety. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[6]  James S. Baxter,et al.  Intention to commit driving violations: An application of the theory of planned behavior. , 1992 .

[7]  Torbjørn Rundmo,et al.  Attitudes towards traffic safety, driving behaviour and accident involvement among the Norwegian public , 2004, Ergonomics.

[8]  S E Forward MEASURING ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOUR USING THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOUR , 1997 .

[9]  Tena I. Katsaounis,et al.  Analyzing Multivariate Data , 2004, Technometrics.

[10]  R Wittink,et al.  The attitude and behaviour of European car drivers to road safety: SARTRE 2 reports, part 1: report on principal results , 1998 .

[11]  Stephen G. Stradling DRIVERS WHO SPEED , 2000 .

[12]  M K Janke,et al.  Accidents, mileage, and the exaggeration of risk. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  David Trafimow,et al.  The Importance of Risk in Determining the Extent to Which Attitudes Affect Intentions to Wear Seat Belts , 1994 .

[14]  Giora Keinan,et al.  Training for Task Performance Under Stress: The Effectiveness of Phased Training Methods , 1990 .

[15]  Gardner Murphy,et al.  Experimental social psychology. , 1934 .

[16]  Dianne Parker,et al.  Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[17]  A. Manstead,et al.  Modifying beliefs and attitudes to exceeding the speed limit: An intervention study based on the theory of planned behavior , 1996 .

[18]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  The Relation Between Perceived Risk and Preventive Action: A Within-Subject Analysis of Perceived Driving Risk and Intentions to Wear Seatbelts , 1990 .

[19]  T Assum Attitudes and road accident risk. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  A Baruya,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF DRIVERS' SPEED ON THE FREQUENCY OF ROAD ACCIDENTS , 2000 .

[21]  L Aberg,et al.  Drinking and driving: intentions, attitudes, and social norms of Swedish male drivers. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Mark S Horswill,et al.  The effect of vehicle characteristics on drivers' risk-taking behaviour , 2002, Ergonomics.

[23]  Leonard Evans,et al.  A new traffic safety vision for the United States. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[24]  A. Manstead,et al.  Reconstructing the theory of planned behaviour , 1996 .

[25]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[26]  T. Rothengatter,et al.  Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application , 1997 .

[27]  Ahmed E. Radwan,et al.  Modeling traffic accident occurrence and involvement. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Gerald A. Juhnke,et al.  Attitude Changes in DWI Offenders: A Study of a Short-Term Treatment Program , 1995 .

[29]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.