Nonlinear Dynamic Transformer Time-Domain Identification for Power Converter Applications

For flyback converter applications, an accurate model of the transformer is necessary for simulation studies, as well as a basis for model-based controller design. In general, transformer modeling has either focused on the winding model, using frequency-domain methods, or on the nonlinear core model, using time-domain methods. Nonlinear modeling is confined to the time domain and certain difficulties have precluded the use of time-domain methods for winding model estimation, resulting in the lack of integrated modeling approaches. This paper focuses on identifying a complete nonlinear dynamic model of a 3-winding transformer using time-domain system identification approaches. Our study demonstrates a possible way to handle the difficulties of working in the time domain and provides a model at least as accurate as that obtained with the frequency response data. In addition to the parameters of the Jiles-Atherton model, which is used to describe the nonlinear core behavior, the air-gap length is also computed from the experimental data to enhance the core model accuracy. The obtained transformer winding model, core model, and full model are experimentally verified.

[1]  Indirect parameter estimation of continuous-time systems using discrete time , 2003, IECON'03. 29th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37468).

[2]  Alex Simpkins,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd Edition (Ljung, L.; 1999) [On the Shelf] , 2012, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[3]  Jose A. Cobos,et al.  Obtaining a frequency-dependent and distributed-effects model of magnetic components from actual measurements , 1999 .

[4]  D. Jiles Frequency dependence of hysteresis curves in 'non-conducting' magnetic materials , 1993 .

[5]  J. Bak-Jenson,et al.  Parametric identification in potential transformer modelling , 1992 .

[6]  H.A. Owen,et al.  Cross-coupled-secondaries model for multiwinding transformers with parameter values calculated from short-circuit impedances , 1990, 21st Annual IEEE Conference on Power Electronics Specialists.

[7]  Peter C. Young,et al.  An optimal instrumental variable approach for identifying hybrid continuous-time Box-Jenkins models , 2006 .

[8]  J.A. Cobos,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between FEA Field Solution and the Magnetic Component Model , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[9]  H. Guldner,et al.  A simple method to determine dynamic hysteresis loops of soft magnetic materials , 1996 .

[10]  G. Sassone,et al.  High-frequency power transformer model for circuit simulation , 1997 .

[11]  Khai D. T. Ngo,et al.  Broadband extended cantilever model for magnetic component windings , 2001 .

[12]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization (Natural Computing Series) , 2005 .

[13]  Peter R. Wilson,et al.  Definition and application of magnetic material metrics in modeling and optimization , 2001 .

[14]  A. Keyhani,et al.  Parameter Estimation for Power Transformer Models from Time-Domain Data , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[15]  L. Vu-Quoc,et al.  A static hysteresis model for power ferrites , 2002 .

[16]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[17]  D. Jiles,et al.  Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis , 1986 .

[18]  H. Unbehauen,et al.  Identification of continuous-time systems , 1991 .