Could robots strengthen the sense of autonomy of older people residing in assisted living facilities?—A future-oriented study

There is an urge to introduce high technology and robotics in care settings. Assisted living (AL) is the fastest growing form of older adults’ long-term care. Resident autonomy has become the watchword for good care. This article sheds light on the potential effects of care robotics on the sense of autonomy of older people in AL. Three aspects of the residents’ sense of autonomy are of particular interest: (a) interaction-based sense of autonomy, (b) coping-based sense of autonomy, and (c) potential-based sense of autonomy. Ethnographical data on resident autonomy in an AL facility and existing literature on care robots are utilized in studying what kind of assurances different types of robots would provide to maintain the sense of autonomy in AL. Robots could strengthen the different types of sense of autonomy in multiple ways. Different types of robots could widen the residents’ space of daily movements, sustain their capacities, and help them maintain and even create future expectations. Robots may strengthen the sense of autonomy of older persons in AL; however, they may simultaneously pose a threat. Multi-professional discussions are needed on whether robots are welcomed in care, and if they are, how, for whom, and in what areas.

[1]  Susan Sherwin,et al.  A relational perspective on autonomy for older adults residing in nursing homes , 2011, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[2]  Jari Pirhonen,et al.  ‘Old but not that old’: Finnish community-dwelling people aged 90+ negotiating their autonomy , 2015, Ageing and Society.

[3]  S. Arber,et al.  Rhetoric and reality of daily life in English care homes: the role of organised activities , 2012 .

[4]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Will Older Adults Accept a Humanoid Robot as a Walking Partner? , 2018, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[5]  B. Collopy Autonomy in long term care: some crucial distinctions. , 1988, The Gerontologist.

[6]  N. Sharkey,et al.  Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[7]  Cory K. Chen,et al.  How good is assisted living? Findings and implications from an outcomes study. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[8]  L. Morgan,et al.  The facade of stability in assisted living. , 2014, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[9]  S Hesse,et al.  Use of the robot assisted gait therapy in rehabilitation of patients with stroke and spinal cord injury. , 2012, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  Norihiro Hagita,et al.  Effectiveness of Social Behaviors for Autonomous Wheelchair Robot to Support Elderly People in Japan , 2015, PloS one.

[11]  P. Kontos,et al.  Embodied selfhood in Alzheimer's disease , 2005 .

[12]  Heather Draper,et al.  Robot carers, ethics, and older people , 2014, Ethics and Information Technology.

[13]  Ray B. Jones,et al.  Video-calls to reduce loneliness and social isolation within care environments for older people: an implementation study using collaborative action research , 2018, BMC Geriatrics.

[14]  Valerie Carr,et al.  Virtual carers for the elderly: A case study review of ethical responsibilities , 2016, Digital health.

[15]  Satu Pekkarinen,et al.  Towards a More Social Orientation in Gerontechnology: Case Study of the “Reminiscence Stick” , 2013 .

[16]  B. Kemp,et al.  Quality of life in assisted living homes: a multidimensional analysis. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[17]  Amanda J. C. Sharkey,et al.  Robots and human dignity: a consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people , 2014, Ethics and Information Technology.

[18]  C. Gastmans,et al.  The use of care robots in aged care: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. , 2018, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[19]  Alex Mihailidis,et al.  Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers , 2016, International Psychogeriatrics.

[20]  Ville Kyrki,et al.  Impacts of robot implementation on care personnel and clients in elderly-care institutions , 2019, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[21]  Cory K. Chen,et al.  Assisted living and nursing homes: apples and oranges? , 2003, The Gerontologist.

[22]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  The emergence of care robotics — A patent and publication analysis , 2015 .

[23]  Liisa Häikiö,et al.  Care 'going market': Finnish elderly-care policies in transition , 2011 .

[24]  B. MacDonald,et al.  The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[25]  George J. Agich,et al.  Dependence and Autonomy in Old Age: An Ethical Framework for Long-term Care , 2003 .

[26]  V A Thurmond,et al.  The point of triangulation. , 2001, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[27]  Khaled Goher,et al.  A reconfigurable wheelchair for mobility and rehabilitation: Design and development , 2016 .

[28]  Tijs Vandemeulebroucke,et al.  How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence , 2018, Aging & mental health.

[29]  P. Baltes,et al.  Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[30]  Jari Pirhonen,et al.  Perceived resident-facility fit and sense of control in assisted living. , 2016, Journal of aging studies.

[31]  Helen V. Dick “Every Time You Deal With a Death You Think, ‘One Day’ … ”: The Emotional and Spiritual Effects of Dealing With Aging, Dying, and Death for Staff in a Residential Aged Care Facility , 2014 .

[32]  R. J. Johnson,et al.  Changes in functional status and the risks of subsequent nursing home placement and death. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[33]  Pia Kontos,et al.  Ethnographic reflections on selfhood, embodiment and Alzheimer's disease , 2004, Ageing and Society.

[34]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  The Role of Healthcare Robots for Older People at Home: A Review , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[35]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[36]  N. Sharkey,et al.  Children, the Elderly, and Interactive Robots , 2011, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[37]  Sandra Bedaf,et al.  Overview and Categorization of Robots Supporting Independent Living of Elderly People: What Activities Do They Support and How Far Have They Developed , 2015, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[38]  A. Honneth,et al.  Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice , 2005 .

[39]  Iina Aaltonen,et al.  Please Call Me?: Calling Practices with Telepresence Robots for the Elderly , 2017, HRI.

[40]  K. Atkins Autonomy and autonomy competencies: a practical and relational approach. , 2006, Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals.

[41]  J. Christman,et al.  Relational Autonomy and the Social Dynamics of Paternalism , 2014 .

[42]  Christine Gustafsson,et al.  Using a Robotic Cat in Dementia Care: A Pilot Study. , 2015, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[43]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Are Emotional Robots Deceptive? , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[44]  Rajiv Khosla,et al.  Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Literature Review , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[45]  J. Quadagno,et al.  The salience of social relationships for resident well-being in assisted living. , 2007, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[46]  Esteem for Contributions to the Common Good: The Role of Personifying Attitudes and Instrumental Value , 2010 .

[47]  J. Vaupel,et al.  Ageing populations: the challenges ahead , 2009, The Lancet.

[48]  L. Yoder,et al.  A Concept Analysis of Person-Centered Care , 2012, Journal of holistic nursing : official journal of the American Holistic Nurses' Association.

[49]  Teemu Rantanen,et al.  Robot use self-efficacy in healthcare work (RUSH): development and validation of a new measure , 2019, AI & SOCIETY.

[50]  J. Raz Comments on The Morality of Freedom , 2016 .

[51]  J. Robertson Robo Sapiens Japanicus: Humanoid Robots and the Posthuman Family , 2007 .

[52]  Aimee van Wynsberghe,et al.  Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[53]  R. Arnold,et al.  The erosion of autonomy in long-term care , 1992 .

[54]  F. Matthews,et al.  Prevalence of dementia in institutional care , 2002, The Lancet.

[55]  Susan Nancarrow,et al.  Effects of person-centered care on residents and staff in aged-care facilities: a systematic review , 2013, Clinical interventions in aging.

[56]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Living With Seal Robots—Its Sociopsychological and Physiological Influences on the Elderly at a Care House , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[57]  Saso Koceski,et al.  Evaluation of an Assistive Telepresence Robot for Elderly Healthcare , 2016, Journal of Medical Systems.

[58]  Russell Blackford Robots and reality: a reply to Robert Sparrow , 2011, Ethics and Information Technology.

[59]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Long-Term Evaluation of a Telepresence Robot for the Elderly: Methodology and Ecological Case Study , 2016, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[60]  E. Mordoch,et al.  Social Commitment Robots and Dementia* , 2012, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement.

[61]  Marketta Niemelä,et al.  Social Robotics, Elderly Care, and Human Dignity: A Recognition-Theoretical Approach , 2016, Robophilosophy/TRANSOR.

[62]  A. Noro,et al.  Vanhuspalvelulain 980/2012 toimeenpanon seuranta : Tilanne ennen lain voimaantuloa vuonna 2013 , 2014 .

[63]  G. Agich Dependence and Autonomy in Old Age: Actual autonomy , 2003 .

[64]  Catriona Mackenzie,et al.  Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Automony, Agency, and the Social Self (review) , 2002 .

[65]  Omar Bentahar,et al.  Investigating automation and AGV in healthcare logistics: a case study based approach , 2018, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications.

[66]  Iina Aaltonen,et al.  Towards Ethical Guidelines of Using Telepresence Robots in Residential Care , 2019, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[67]  Christian Werner,et al.  A systematic review of study results reported for the evaluation of robotic rollators from the perspective of users , 2018, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[68]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Identifying the Potential for Robotics to Assist Older Adults in Different Living Environments , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[69]  Peter J. Bentley,et al.  Investigating the Suitability of Social Robots for the Wellbeing of the Elderly , 2011, ACII.

[70]  Erin G Roth,et al.  The Vernacular Landscape of Assisted Living. , 2011, Journal of aging studies.

[71]  Mary M. Ball,et al.  Relational Autonomy in Assisted Living: A Focus on Diverse Care Settings for Older Adults. , 2012, Journal of aging studies.

[72]  Eva FM Krah,et al.  Exploring the ambivalent evidence base of mobile health (mHealth): A systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones for the improvement of community health in Africa , 2016, Digital health.

[73]  E. Bush,et al.  The Use of Human Touch to Improve the Well-Being of Older Adults , 2001, Journal of holistic nursing : official journal of the American Holistic Nurses' Association.

[74]  Robert Sparrow,et al.  In the hands of machines? The future of aged care , 2006, Minds and Machines.

[75]  R. Chapin,et al.  Aging in place in assisted living: philosophy versus policy. , 2001, The Gerontologist.

[76]  Satu Pekkarinen,et al.  Digitalisation in Health Care and Elderly Care Services: From Potholes to Innovation Opportunities , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Soc. Chang..

[77]  Hannu Lehtinen,et al.  Robotics in Care Services : A Finnish Roadmap , 2017 .

[78]  Jari Pirhonen Good Human Life in Assisted Living for Older People : What the residents are able to do and be , 2017 .

[79]  M. Calnan,et al.  Identity in the fourth age: perseverance, adaptation and maintaining dignity , 2012, Ageing and Society.

[80]  Suzie Drummond,et al.  Connecting the person with dementia and family: a feasibility study of a telepresence robot , 2014, BMC Geriatrics.

[81]  Marketta Niemelä,et al.  Robots as Social and Physical Assistants in Elderly Care , 2019, Translational Systems Sciences.

[82]  D. Brooker What is Person-Centred Care in Dementia? , 2003 .

[83]  S. West,et al.  Kin Selection in the RNA World , 2017, Life.

[84]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Domestic Robots for Older Adults: Attitudes, Preferences, and Potential , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[85]  B. L. Combs,et al.  Managing decline in assisted living: the key to aging in place. , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[86]  SparrowRobert,et al.  In the hands of machines? The future of aged care , 2006 .

[87]  Martin H. Levinson Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other , 2011 .