Differentiation and Parity in Assortment Pricing

Are consumers more likely to purchase an item from an assortment in which options are priced at parity or from an assortment in which options vary in price? This research examines the influence of parity-pricing and differentiation-pricing strategies on consumer choice and identifies conditions in which parity pricing facilitates choice, as well as conditions in which choice is facilitated by differential pricing. In a series of three experiments, the impact of assortment pricing on choice is shown to be a function of the uncertainty associated with consumers' preferences and the consistency of these preferences with options' prices.

[1]  R. Dhar.  Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option , 1997 .

[2]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Wine Online: Search Costs Affect Competition on Price, Quality, and Distribution , 2000 .

[3]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[4]  B. Kahn,et al.  Variety for sale: Mass customization or mass confusion? , 1998 .

[5]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Smart Agents: When Lower Search Costs for Quality Information Increase Price Sensitivity , 2003 .

[6]  Rebecca K. Ratner,et al.  Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. , 1999 .

[7]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice , 2003 .

[8]  B. Kahn,et al.  Modeling choice among assortments. , 1991 .

[9]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[10]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[11]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Consumers’ Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction , 1998 .

[12]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[13]  A. Chernev.  When More Is Less and Less Is More: the Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice This Research Argues That Choices from Different Size Assort- Ments Are a Function of the Degree to Which Consumers Have , 2022 .

[14]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[15]  Alexander Chernev,et al.  Feature Complementarity and Assortment in Choice , 2005 .

[16]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  The Variety of an Assortment , 1999 .

[17]  A. Chernev.  Decision Focus and Consumer Choice Among Assortments , 2006 .

[18]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  Customer reactions to variety: Too much of a good thing? , 1998 .

[19]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices , 1995 .

[20]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Making Complementary Choices in Consumption Episodes: Highlighting versus Balancing , 1999 .

[21]  R. Nisbett,et al.  The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons , 2000 .

[23]  B. Kahn,et al.  The Influence of Assortment Structure on Perceived Variety and Consumption Quantities , 2004 .

[24]  A. Chernev.  Product Assortment and Individual Decision Processes , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  A. Chernev,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? Option Attractiveness and Assortment Choice , 2006 .

[26]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Consumption Vocabulary and Preference Formation , 1996 .