Datagogies, Writing Spaces, and the Age of Peer Production

Abstract This essay investigates how teachers and Writing Program Administrators (WPAs) can use commons-based peer-to-peer technologies to change their roles, to alter writing instruction and literacy genres, and to transform our processes of learning, writing, and collaborating. The essay introduces the term “datagogy” to theorize about the synergy that takes place when “crowds” of teachers employ technologies to construct and debate shared pedagogies. The essay juxtaposes the values and ideologies of two metaphorical communities, the Community of Power and the Community of Learning, explores how these communities use and design online learning communities, and concludes that datagogies are unique interfaces that emphasize the values of the Community of Learning as opposed to the values of the Community of Power. Finally, the essay argues that English studies will concede the central pedagogical stage of the 21st century unless we develop datagogies that engage the creative power of individuals working collaboratively in a climate that respects diversity and independent thinking.

[1]  Graduate Students, Writing Programs, and Consensus-based Management: Collaboration in the Face of Disciplinary Ideology. , 1998 .

[2]  John Trimbur,et al.  Consensus and Difference in Collaborative Learning. , 1989 .

[3]  Timothy R. Donovan,et al.  Perspectives on Research and Scholarship in Composition. , 1987 .

[4]  Barclay Barrios.  Reimagining writing program web sites as pedagogical tools , 2004 .

[5]  Y. Benkler,et al.  Commons‐based Peer Production and Virtue* , 2006 .

[6]  Donald Morison Murray,et al.  A writer teaches writing , 1968 .

[7]  Rafael Heller.  Questionable Categories and the Case for Collaborative Writing , 2003 .

[8]  Cynthia L. Selfe,et al.  Testing Claims for On-Line Conferences , 1991 .

[9]  Patricia Rogers.  Barriers to Adopting Emerging Technologies in Education , 2000 .

[10]  Richard Johnson-Sheehan,et al.  Changing the Center of Gravity: Collaborative Writing Program Administration in Large Universities , 2004 .

[11]  Gail E. Hawisher.  Passions Pedagogies and 21st Century Technologies , 1999 .

[12]  Myron C. Tuman,et al.  Literacy online : the promise (and peril) of reading and writing with computers , 1993 .

[13]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[14]  Dennis E Baron,et al.  From Pencils to Pixels: The Stages of Literacy Technologies , 1999 .

[15]  J. E. Porter.  Why technology matters to writing: A cyberwriter's tale , 2003 .

[16]  K. LeFevre,et al.  Invention as a Social Act , 1986 .

[17]  D. Meadows-Klue.  The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , 2004 .

[18]  Cynthia L. Selfe,et al.  The Politics of the Interface: Power and Its Exercise in Electronic Contact Zones. , 1994 .

[19]  David Lyon,et al.  Computers, Surveillance, and Privacy , 1996 .

[20]  K. Bruffee.  Collaborative Learning and the “Conversation of Mankind” , 1984, College English.

[21]  Kristine Blair,et al.  Cui bono?: Revisiting the promises and perils of online learning , 2003 .

[22]  Thomas J Reynolds,et al.  The Face of Collaboration , 1990 .

[23]  Todd Taylor,et al.  Literacy Theory in the Age of the Internet. , 1998 .

[24]  James A. Berlin.  Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class , 1988, College English.

[25]  Cynthia L. Selfe,et al.  The Rhetoric of Technology and the Electronic Writing Class , 1991, College Composition & Communication.

[26]  Dolores Brzycki,et al.  Overcoming Barriers to Technology Use in Teacher Preparation Programs , 2005 .

[27]  Robert Samuels.  The future threat to computers and composition: Nontenured instructors, intellectual property, and distance education , 2004 .

[28]  J. Giles.  Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[29]  Victoria K. Swinney.  The politics and processes of scholarship , 1996 .

[30]  K. Bruffee.  Social Construction, Language, and the Authority of Knowledge: A Bibliographical Essay , 1986, College English.

[31]  J. Emig.  The Composing Processes of Twelfth Graders , 1971 .

[32]  David W. Smit.  Some Difficulties with Collaborative Learning. , 1989 .

[33]  Cynthia L. Selfe,et al.  Integrating Multimodality into Composition Curricula: Survey Methodolgy and Results from a Cccc Research Grant , 2006 .

[34]  John Schilb,et al.  Contending with Words Composition and Rhetoric in a Postmodern Age , 1993 .

[35]  Joseph M. Moxley,et al.  The Politics And Processes Of Scholarship , 1995 .

[36]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Understanding the experiences of instructors as they adopt a course management system , 2007 .

[37]  Donald E. Zimmerman,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Adoption of Software and Hardware by Faculty in the Liberal Arts and Sciences , 2006 .

[38]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Open systems and citizenship: Designing a departmental web site as an open system , 2003 .

[39]  James A. Berlin.  Rhetorics, Poetics, and Cultures: Refiguring College English Studies. Refiguring English Studies Series. , 1996 .

[40]  R. Rorty,et al.  Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. , 1980 .

[41]  P. Parrinder,et al.  The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature , 1997 .

[42]  Peter Elbow,et al.  Embracing Contraries: Explorations in Learning and Teaching , 1986 .

[43]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[44]  Marilyn Deegan,et al.  Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing , 1993 .

[45]  Barbara Blakely Duffelmeyer.  Critical computer literacy: computers in first-year composition as topic and environment , 2000 .

[46]  Thomas J Reynolds,et al.  The Face of Collaboration in the Networked Writing Classroom. , 1990 .

[47]  S. A. Selber.  Technological dramas: A meta-discourse heuristic for critical literacy , 2004 .