Language Teaching and Technology Forum: The Integration of a Student Response System in Flipped Classrooms.

The present study incorporates a student response system (SRS) as a means to engage students in a flipped classroom and promote active learning. While the effectiveness of such systems with regard to student learning has been well documented in disciplines that are dominated by lecture-based instruction, no studies have compared the effectiveness of SRSintegrated flipped classrooms in English language teaching contexts, as supported by the two different techniques of just-in-time teaching (JiTT) and peer instruction (PI). This study thus aims to fill this gap in the literature by examining the effects of SRS-integrated flipped classrooms on English language learners’ speaking skills, willingness to communicate, and satisfaction with the flipped learning experiences. Using a quasi-experimental design, the overall results indicate that SRS-integrated flipped classrooms are capable of providing interactive learning opportunities that enhance learners’ willingness to communicate, aiding their development of speaking skills and increasing their satisfaction with such learning experiences. The findings further suggest that the proposed approach has an additional advantage for motivating learners with low willingness to communicate to interact with the teacher and their peers in class activities, especially when facilitated by the PI technique.

[1]  C. Phillips,et al.  The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[2]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[3]  Hsiu-Ting Hung,et al.  Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning , 2015 .

[4]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[5]  Alaba Olaoluwakotansibe Agbatogun,et al.  Developing Learners' Second Language Communicative Competence through Active Learning: Clickers or Communicative Approach? , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[6]  Alf Inge Wang,et al.  The wear out effect of a game-based student response system , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[7]  J. Mccroskey Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale , 1992 .

[8]  R. Clément,et al.  Conceptualizing Willingness to Communicate in a L2: A Situational Model of L2 Confidence and Affiliation , 1998 .

[9]  Nathaniel J. Hunsu,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[10]  S. A. Becker,et al.  NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition , 2015 .

[11]  Andrew Gavrin,et al.  Just-In-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology , 1999 .

[12]  Chun-Yen Chang,et al.  Do we click in the right way? A meta-analytic review of clicker-integrated instruction , 2016 .

[13]  Donna Ogle K-W-L: A Teaching Model That Develops Active Reading of Expository Text. , 1986 .

[14]  สุธััญญา ด้วงอินทร์,et al.  Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day , 2017 .

[15]  Walcir Cardoso,et al.  Learning a foreign language with a learner response system: the students' perspective , 2011 .

[16]  Hsiu‐Ting Hung,et al.  Design‐Based Research: Redesign of an English Language Course Using a Flipped Classroom Approach , 2017 .

[17]  Lindy Woodrow,et al.  Willingness to Communicate in English: A Model in the Chinese EFL Classroom Context , 2010 .

[18]  Zuway-R. Hong,et al.  The effects of a flipped English classroom intervention on students’ information and communication technology and English reading comprehension , 2015, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[19]  Courtney B. Cazden,et al.  Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Second Edition. , 2001 .