Regulation of harvester ant foraging as a closed-loop excitable system

Ant colonies regulate activity in response to changing conditions without using centralized control. Desert harvester ant colonies forage for seeds, and regulate foraging to manage a tradeoff between spending and obtaining water. Foragers lose water while outside in the dry air, but ants obtain water by metabolizing the fats in the seeds they eat. Previous work shows that the rate at which an outgoing forager leaves the nest depends on its recent rate of brief antennal contacts with incoming foragers carrying food. We examine how this process can yield foraging rates that are robust to uncertainty and responsive to temperature and humidity across minute-to-hour timescales. To explore possible mechanisms, we develop a low-dimensional analytical model with a small number of parameters that captures observed foraging behavior. The model uses excitability dynamics to represent response to interactions inside the nest and a random delay distribution to represent foraging time outside the nest. We show how feedback from outgoing foragers returning to the nest stabilizes the incoming and outgoing foraging rates to a common value determined by the volatility of available foragers. The model exhibits a critical volatility above which there is sustained foraging at a constant rate and below which foraging stops. To explain how foraging rates adjust to temperature and humidity, we propose that foragers modify their volatility after they leave the nest and become exposed to the environment. Our study highlights the importance of feedback in the regulation of foraging activity and shows how modulation of volatility can explain how foraging activity responds to conditions and varies across colonies. Our model elucidates the role of feedback across many timescales in collective behavior, and may be generalized to other systems driven by excitable dynamics, such as neuronal networks.

[1]  Alexander Novikov,et al.  On a piece-wise deterministic Markov process model , 2001 .

[2]  Balaji Prabhakar,et al.  The Regulation of Ant Colony Foraging Activity without Spatial Information , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  Henry C. Tuckwell,et al.  Introduction to theoretical neurobiology , 1988 .

[4]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The rewards of restraint in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ant colonies , 2013, Nature.

[5]  Adam Guetz,et al.  Colony variation in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ants. , 2011, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[6]  Robert B. Cooper,et al.  An Introduction To Queueing Theory , 2016 .

[7]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Behavioral Flexibility and the Foraging Ecology of Seed-Eating Ants , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[8]  M. Neuts,et al.  Introduction to Queueing Theory (2nd ed.). , 1983 .

[9]  G. Shedler,et al.  Simulation of Nonhomogeneous Poisson Processes by Thinning , 1979 .

[10]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Interactions with Combined Chemical Cues Inform Harvester Ant Foragers' Decisions to Leave the Nest in Search of Food , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published January 22, 2007 Behavioral Ecology , 2022 .

[12]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  R. Stein A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF NEURONAL VARIABILITY. , 1965, Biophysical journal.

[14]  N. Franks,et al.  Colony-level cognition , 2009, Current Biology.

[15]  M. Myerscough,et al.  A flexible model of foraging by a honey bee colony: the effects of individual behaviour on foraging success. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  D. Gordon,et al.  Task-Related Environment Alters the Cuticular Hydrocarbon Composition of Harvester Ants , 2001, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[17]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  How colony growth affects forager intrusion between neighboring harvester ant colonies , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  Katherine N. Dektar,et al.  Harvester Ant Colony Variation in Foraging Activity and Response to Humidity , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  Ward Whitt,et al.  The Physics of the Mt/G/∞ Queue , 1993, Oper. Res..

[20]  John R. B. Lighton,et al.  Water-Loss Rate and Cuticular Permeability in Foragers of the Desert Ant Pogonomyrmex rugosus , 1989, Physiological Zoology.

[21]  Martin C. Stumpe,et al.  Harvester ants use interactions to regulate forager activation and availability , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  Boris Granovskiy,et al.  How dancing honey bees keep track of changes: the role of inspector bees , 2012 .

[23]  Serban Nacu,et al.  How site fidelity leads to individual differences in the foraging activity of harvester ants , 2009 .

[24]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  Costs of Environmental Fluctuations and Benefits of Dynamic Decentralized Foraging Decisions in Honey Bees , 2004, Adapt. Behav..

[25]  S. Pratt,et al.  A modelling framework for understanding social insect foraging , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  S. Yoshizawa,et al.  An Active Pulse Transmission Line Simulating Nerve Axon , 1962, Proceedings of the IRE.

[27]  T. Seeley,et al.  Swarm cognition in honey bees , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  D. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[29]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Effect of Interactions between Harvester Ants on Forager Decisions , 2016, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[30]  N. K. Rozov,et al.  Differential Equations with Small Parameters and Relaxation Oscillations , 1980 .

[31]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The short-term regulation of foraging in harvester ants , 2008 .

[32]  D. Gordon The organization of work in social insect colonies , 1996, Nature.

[33]  J. Lighton,et al.  Standard energy metabolism of a desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex rugosus: Effects of temperature, body mass, group size, and humidity. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Maya B. Mathur,et al.  Interactions Increase Forager Availability and Activity in Harvester Ants , 2015, PloS one.

[35]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  Optimisation of a honeybee-colony's energetics via social learning based on queuing delays , 2008, Connect. Sci..

[37]  I. Couzin Collective cognition in animal groups , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard Multi-agent system dynamics: Bifurcation and behavior of animal groups , 2014, Annu. Rev. Control..

[39]  Tim Kovacs,et al.  On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[40]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The Role of Dopamine in the Collective Regulation of Foraging in Harvester Ants , 2018, iScience.

[41]  R. FitzHugh Impulses and Physiological States in Theoretical Models of Nerve Membrane. , 1961, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The development of an ant colony's foraging range , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  D. Gordon,et al.  Social insects: Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions , 2003, Nature.

[44]  Amos Korman,et al.  Individual versus collective cognition in social insects , 2017, Journal of Experimental Biology.