Developing a methodology for analysis of benefits and shortcomings of ISO 14001 registration: lessons from experience of a large machinery manufacturer

Abstract The decision-making process of implementing an Environmental Management System according to the ISO 14001 registration is a critical task for a number of reasons. The first is that most of the benefit and cost attributes are intangible by their nature and are difficult to measure. Second, the strategic decision has a relevant “political” dimension, since it requires a multidisciplinary support and convergence from different functions/departments within a company. Third, the analysis of the pros and cons is highly firm- and situation-specific and thus requires a versatile and flexible approach. This paper illustrates the formulation of a decision support methodology for multi-attribute analysis of ISO 14001 implementation which involves developing a framework of benefits and costs and structuring them hierarchically for the successive use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). After presenting the theoretical foundations of the AHP and the research model that has been built for ISO 14001 implementation, an application of the methodology that has been carried out at one large food machinery manufacturer is illustrated.

[1]  Gerald Vinten The objectives of the environmental audit , 1996 .

[2]  Diane Holt The perceived benefits of an environmental management standard , 1998, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[3]  Peter Tucker,et al.  Environmental Management in Agriculture : An expert system approach , 1996 .

[4]  S. J. Mraz HIGH-TECH KIT CAPTURES MUSTANG SPIRIT , 1996 .

[5]  Lawrence M. Corbett,et al.  Environmental management systems in the New Zealand plastics industry , 2000 .

[6]  Hamid R. Parsaei,et al.  Economic and financial justification of advanced manufacturing technologies , 1992 .

[7]  Henry C. W. Lau,et al.  A self‐assessed quality management system based on integration of MBNQA/ISO 9000/ISO 14000 , 1999 .

[8]  Donald H. Liles,et al.  A Classification Scheme for Traditional and Non-Traditional Approaches to the Economic Justification of Advanced Automated Manufacturing Systems , 1992 .

[9]  Rauno Tamminen,et al.  Ownership in environmental management , 1999 .

[10]  Ronald Begley,et al.  IS ISO 14000 WORTH IT , 1996 .

[11]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Client/customer or stakeholder focus? ISO 14000 EMS as a construction industry case study , 2000 .

[12]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[13]  Rick Elam,et al.  Emerging ISO 14000 environmental standards: a step‐by‐step implementation guide , 2000 .

[14]  H. Quazi Implementation of an environmental management system: the experience of companies operating in Singapore , 1999 .

[15]  R. Sathiendrakumar,et al.  Sustainable development: passing fad or potential reality? , 1996 .

[16]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  The new product design process and design for environment "Crossing the chasm" , 2000 .

[17]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  The relationship between ISO 14001 and continuous source reduction programs , 2000 .

[18]  Anne Grafé-Buckens,et al.  Engaging the stakeholders: corporate views and current trends , 1998 .

[19]  James P. Dycus Kansas City ‐ flexible manufacturing system , 1998 .

[20]  Allen J. Clegg,et al.  Environmental leadership and competitive advantage through environmental management system standards , 1998 .

[21]  Lynn Johannson How can a continuous improvement approach help your organization with ems , 1993 .

[22]  Rodger A. Jump Implementing ISO 14000: Overcoming barriers to registration , 1995 .

[23]  Upendra Dave,et al.  Economic and Multiattribute Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing Systems , 1988 .

[24]  Glenn G. Stock,et al.  Implementing an environmental business strategy: A step‐by‐step guide , 1997 .

[25]  Peter A. Strachan Is the Eco‐Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) Regulation an effective strategic marketing tool for implementing industrial organisations? , 1999 .

[26]  J. H. Mccreary ISO 14000 : A framework for coordinating existing environmental management responsibilities , 1996 .

[27]  Roger N. Wabalickis Justification of FMS with the analytic hierarchy process , 1988 .

[28]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  An evaluation of success factors using the AHP to implement ISO 14001‐based EMS , 1999 .

[29]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making for leaders , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[30]  John Tzilivakis,et al.  Evaluating a technique used to measure environmental performance within agriculture–case studies , 1998 .

[31]  E. Craigmcgee,et al.  Applying the baldrige quality criteria to environmental performance: Lessons from leading organizations , 1993 .

[32]  Lynn Johannson,et al.  The challenge of implementing ISO 14001 for small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises—surviving in the new global jungle , 1997 .

[33]  Jan B. Jonker,et al.  The significance of recent EMS standards as an impetus for improvement , 1998 .

[34]  Geoffrey A. Moore,et al.  Crossing the Chasm , 1991 .

[35]  Erin Craig Proactive environmental programs: Defining customers and measuring their expectations at apple computer , 1992 .

[36]  Lisa-Henri Kirkland,et al.  Challenges in designing, implementing and operating an environmental management system , 1999 .

[37]  Andrea Coulson,et al.  Corporate environmental performance considerations within bank lending decisions , 1999 .

[38]  Ben Vivian ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: ASSET OR LIABILITY? , 1997 .