Multiple Domains of the Co-chaperone Hop Are Important for Hsp70 Binding*

The Hop/Sti1 co-chaperone binds to both Hsp70 and Hsp90. Biochemical and co-crystallographic studies have suggested that the EEVD-containing C terminus of Hsp70 or Hsp90 binds specifically to one of the Hop tetratricopeptide repeat domains, TPR1 or TPR2a, respectively. Mutational analyses of Hsp70 and Hop were undertaken to better characterize interactions between the C terminus of Hsp70 and Hop domains. Surprisingly, truncation of EEVD plus as many as 34 additional amino acids from the Hsp70 C terminus did not reduce the ability of Hsp70 mutants to co-immunoprecipitate with Hop, although further truncation eliminated Hop binding. Hop point mutations targeting a carboxylate clamp position in TPR1 disrupted Hsp70 binding, as was expected; however, similar point mutations in TPR2a or TPR2b also inhibited Hsp70 binding in some settings. Using a yeast-based in vivo assay for Hop function, wild type Hop and TPR2b mutants could fully complement deletion of Sti1p; TPR1 and TPR2a point mutants could partially restore activity. Conformations of Hop and Hop mutants were probed by limited proteolysis. The TPR1 mutant digested in a similar manner to wild type; however, TPR2a and TPR2b mutants each displayed greater resistance to chymotryptic digestion. All point mutants retained an ability to dimerize, and none appeared to be grossly misfolded. These results raise questions about current models for Hop/Hsp70 interaction.

[1]  L. Pearl,et al.  Structure and functional relationships of Hsp90. , 2003, Current cancer drug targets.

[2]  C. Hsiao,et al.  Crystal Structure of the C-terminal 10-kDa Subdomain of Hsc70* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  D. Picard,et al.  The Hsp90‐binding peptidylprolyl isomerase FKBP52 potentiates glucocorticoid signaling in vivo , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[4]  Chrisostomos Prodromou,et al.  Structural and functional analysis of the middle segment of hsp90: implications for ATP hydrolysis and client protein and cochaperone interactions. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[5]  Richard Zimmermann,et al.  Tetratricopeptide Repeat Motif-mediated Hsc70-mSTI1 Interaction , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  W. Pratt,et al.  Regulation of Signaling Protein Function and Trafficking by the hsp90/hsp70-Based Chaperone Machinery 1 , 2003, Experimental biology and medicine.

[7]  J. Clardy,et al.  Structure of the large FK506-binding protein FKBP51, an Hsp90-binding protein and a component of steroid receptor complexes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  David F. Smith,et al.  Comparison of the carboxy-terminal DP-repeat region in the co-chaperones Hop and Hip , 2003, Cell stress & chaperones.

[9]  P. Taylor,et al.  A Structure-based Mutational Analysis of Cyclophilin 40 Identifies Key Residues in the Core Tetratricopeptide Repeat Domain That Mediate Binding to Hsp90* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  D. Toft,et al.  The Assembly and Intermolecular Properties of the hsp70-Hop-hsp90 Molecular Chaperone Complex* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  J. Hegemann,et al.  A second set of loxP marker cassettes for Cre-mediated multiple gene knockouts in budding yeast. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  S. Jackson,et al.  Stimulation of the weak ATPase activity of human hsp90 by a client protein. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  D. Cyr,et al.  From the cradle to the grave: molecular chaperones that may choose between folding and degradation , 2001, EMBO reports.

[14]  G. Blatch,et al.  The cochaperone murine stress-inducible protein 1: overexpression, purification, and characterization. , 2001, Protein expression and purification.

[15]  M. Mayer,et al.  Hsp70 chaperone machines. , 2001, Advances in protein chemistry.

[16]  Luis Moroder,et al.  Structure of TPR Domain–Peptide Complexes Critical Elements in the Assembly of the Hsp70–Hsp90 Multichaperone Machine , 2000, Cell.

[17]  G. Blatch,et al.  Heat shock cognate protein 70 chaperone-binding site in the co-chaperone murine stress-inducible protein 1 maps to within three consecutive tetratricopeptide repeat motifs. , 2000, The Biochemical journal.

[18]  M. Galigniana,et al.  A model for the cytoplasmic trafficking of signalling proteins involving the hsp90-binding immunophilins and p50cdc37. , 1999, Cellular signalling.

[19]  Michael Chinkers,et al.  Identification of Conserved Residues Required for the Binding of a Tetratricopeptide Repeat Domain to Heat Shock Protein 90* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  Hong Wang,et al.  High-resolution solution structure of the 18 kDa substrate-binding domain of the mammalian chaperone protein Hsc70. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Chrisostomos Prodromou,et al.  Regulation of Hsp90 ATPase activity by tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)‐domain co‐chaperones , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[22]  R. Minchin,et al.  The Common Tetratricopeptide Repeat Acceptor Site for Steroid Receptor-associated Immunophilins and Hop Is Located in the Dimerization Domain of Hsp90* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  David F. Smith,et al.  Hop as an Adaptor in the Heat Shock Protein 70 (Hsp70) and Hsp90 Chaperone Machinery* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  D. Toft,et al.  The Assembly of Progesterone Receptor-hsp90 Complexes Using Purified Proteins* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  U. Gehring,et al.  Interference between Proteins Hap46 and Hop/p60, Which Bind to Different Domains of the Molecular Chaperone hsp70/hsc70 , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[26]  D. Toft,et al.  Differential interactions of p23 and the TPR-containing proteins Hop, Cyp40, FKBP52 and FKBP51 with Hsp90 mutants. , 1998, Cell stress & chaperones.

[27]  J. Höhfeld,et al.  The Carboxy-Terminal Domain of Hsc70 Provides Binding Sites for a Distinct Set of Chaperone Cofactors , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[28]  J. Buchner,et al.  Two chaperone sites in Hsp90 differing in substrate specificity and ATP dependence. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  D. Toft,et al.  Hop Modulates hsp70/hsp90 Interactions in Protein Folding* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  L. Pearl,et al.  Identification and Structural Characterization of the ATP/ADP-Binding Site in the Hsp90 Molecular Chaperone , 1997, Cell.

[31]  B. Zetter,et al.  Stress-inducible, Murine Protein mSTI1 , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  S. Lindquist,et al.  In vivo analysis of the Hsp90 cochaperone Sti1 (p60) , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[33]  R. Rimerman,et al.  Mutational analysis of the hsp70-interacting protein Hip , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[34]  W. Pratt,et al.  Reconstitution of the Steroid Receptor·hsp90 Heterocomplex Assembly System of Rabbit Reticulocyte Lysate* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  F. Hartl,et al.  Hip, a novel cochaperone involved in the eukaryotic hsc70/hsp40 reaction cycle , 1995, Cell.

[36]  R. Morimoto,et al.  Identification of a regulatory motif in Hsp70 that affects ATPase activity, substrate binding and interaction with HDJ‐1. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[37]  W. Konigsberg Limited proteolysis of DNA polymerases as probe of functional domains. , 1995, Methods in enzymology.

[38]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of the ATPase fragment of a 70K heat-shock cognate protein , 1990, Nature.