Making Conformance Work: Constructing Accessibility Standards Compliance

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and the Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) constitute core accessibility resources for Web designers and developers. To explore their deployment, I conduct interviews with 10 practitioners who use WCAG and WAIARIA in their work. Using techniques derived from grounded theory and situational analysis, I develop the concept of conformance work. Conformance work refers to how designers and developers develop harmonized interpretations of WAI-ARIA and WCAG, and the Websites these specifications are meant to instruct. Conformance work is the upstream work designers and developers engage in to invest categories such as “standards compliance” and “Web accessibility” with meaning.

[1]  T. Titchkosky.  "To Pee or not to Pee"? Ordinary Talk about Extraordinary Exclusions in a University Environment , 2008 .

[2]  Tom McEwan,et al.  ALT text and basic accessibility , 2007, BCS HCI.

[3]  Deborah Stienstra,et al.  Engaging Citizens with Disabilities in eDemocracy , 2005 .

[4]  Gerard Goggin,et al.  Digital Disability: The Social Construction of Disability in New Media , 2002 .

[5]  Ko Un.  Shift to Inclusive Education According to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: with priority given to the Germany teacher education system , 2012 .

[6]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[7]  Christopher Newell,et al.  The Business of Digital Disability , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[8]  J. Wajcman.  New connections: social studies of science and technology and studies of work , 2006 .

[9]  Nicholas Zaparyniuk,et al.  The Status of Web Accessibility of Canadian Universities and Colleges: A Charter of Rights and Freedoms Issue , 2005 .

[10]  David Sloan,et al.  From Web accessibility to Web adaptability , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[11]  O. Gandy.  The Real Digital Divide: Citizens versus Consumers , 2002 .

[12]  Elizabeth Ellcessor,et al.  BRIDGING DISABILITY DIVIDES , 2010 .

[13]  T. Titchkosky.  Governing Embodiment: Technologies of Constituting Citizens with Disabilities , 2003 .

[14]  A. Young.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. , 2001 .

[15]  James Watzke,et al.  A Three-Way Dance: The Global Public Good and Accessibility in Information Technologies , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[16]  V. Finkelstein,et al.  The 'Social Model of Disability' and the Disability Movement , 2007 .

[17]  P. Gorny,et al.  Tools for working with guidelines: a CHI '94 special interest group , 1995, SGCH.

[18]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Making work visible , 1995, CACM.

[20]  Bambang Parmanto,et al.  A longitudinal evaluation of accessibility: higher education web sites , 2005, Internet Res..

[21]  Jon Gunderson,et al.  Functional web accessibility techniques and tools from the university of Illinois , 2006, Assets '06.

[22]  Liddy Nevile,et al.  Web Accessibility 3.0: Learning From The Past, Planning For The Future , 2008 .

[23]  David Ribes.  THE POSITIONS OF THE SOCIAL SCIENTIST: SOCIAL AND TECHNICAL ACTS OF INTERVENTION , 2005 .

[24]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization , 1997 .

[25]  M. Arnold.  Systems design meets Habermas, Foucault and Latour , 2003 .

[26]  Jutta Treviranus,et al.  Inclusive E-learning , 2006 .

[27]  K. Baker,et al.  Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment , 2009 .

[28]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[29]  Dorothy M. Fisher,et al.  Web Accessibility and Information Systems Curriculum , 2007, Fourth International Conference on Information Technology (ITNG'07).

[30]  M. Foucault,et al.  The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction , 1990 .

[31]  L. Thevenot,et al.  Rules and implements: investment in forms , 1984 .

[32]  Lawrence Busch,et al.  The moral economy of grades and standards , 2000 .

[33]  Steven G. Epstein,et al.  Beyond the Standard Human , 2009 .

[34]  Jutta Treviranus.  You say tomato, I say tomato, let's not call the whole thing off: the challenge of user experience design in distributed learning environments , 2009 .

[35]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Standards and their stories : how quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life , 2009 .

[36]  Shawn Lawton Henry,et al.  Interdependent components of web accessibility , 2005, W4A '05.

[37]  Ingunn Moser,et al.  Disability and the promises of technology: Technology, subjectivity and embodiment within an order of the normal , 2006 .

[38]  Imran Kabir,et al.  Representation and Reorganization of Web Accessibility Guidelines Using Goal Graphs and Design Patterns , 2008 .

[39]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Design of HTML pages to increase their accessibility to users with disabilities: strategies for today and tomorrow , 1996, LINK.

[40]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[41]  April D'Aubin,et al.  Working for Barrier Removal in the ICT Area: Creating a More Accessible and Inclusive Canada , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[42]  Junji Maeda,et al.  Site-wide annotation: reconstructing existing pages to be accessible , 2002, Assets '02.

[43]  C. Brid Nicholson,et al.  Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability , 2006 .

[44]  Angus Stevenson,et al.  Concise Oxford English Dictionary , 2009 .

[45]  Michael Oliver,et al.  Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice , 1995 .

[46]  E. Shorter.  About the history of sexuality. , 2007, Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica : a Magyar Pszichofarmakologiai Egyesulet lapja = official journal of the Hungarian Association of Psychopharmacology.

[47]  A. Strauss.  A SOCIAL WORLD PERSPECTIVE* , 2012 .

[48]  I. V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Towards one world web with HearSay3 , 2008, W4A '08.

[49]  David Kreps,et al.  Enabling or disabling technologies? A critical approach to web accessibility , 2006, Inf. Technol. People.

[50]  L. Suchman,et al.  Problematizing 'Innovation' as a Critical Project , 2000 .

[51]  Stephanie Taylor.  Locating and conducting discourse analytic research , 2001 .

[52]  S. L. Star,et al.  Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On being Allergic to Onions , 1990 .

[53]  Giorgio Brajnik,et al.  SAMBA: a semi-automatic method for measuring barriers of accessibility , 2007, Assets '07.

[54]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Accessmonkey: a collaborative scripting framework for web users and developers , 2007, W4A '07.

[55]  Lei Wu,et al.  The revival of Mozilla in the browser war against Internet Explorer , 2005, ICEC '05.

[56]  S Wendell,et al.  Toward a Feminist Theory of Disability , 1989, Hypatia.

[57]  S. Shapin.  The Invisible Technician , 1989 .

[58]  A. Clement,et al.  The Access Rainbow: Conceptualizing Universal Access to the Information/ Communications Infrastructure , 2000 .

[59]  Hironobu Takagi,et al.  Accessibility commons: a metadata repository for web accessibility , 2009, LINK.

[60]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension Between Standardization and Flexibility , 1996 .

[61]  Hironobu Takagi,et al.  Social accessibility: achieving accessibility through collaborative metadata authoring , 2008, Assets '08.

[62]  A. Clarke.  Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn , 2005 .