Fast kinematic ray tracing of first‐ and later‐arriving global seismic phases

Summary We have developed a ray tracing algorithm that traces first- and later-arriving global seismic phases precisely (traveltime errors of the order of 0.1 s), and with great computational efficiency (15 rays s− 1). To achieve this, we have extended and adapted two existing ray tracing techniques: a graph method and a perturbation method. The two resulting algorithms are able to trace (critically) refracted, (multiply) reflected, some diffracted (Pdiff), and (multiply) converted seismic phases in a 3-D spherical geometry, thus including the largest part of seismic phases that are commonly observed on seismograms. We have tested and compared the two methods in 2-D and 3-D Cartesian and spherical models, for which both algorithms have yielded precise paths and traveltimes. These tests indicate that only the perturbation method is computationally efficient enough to perform 3-D ray tracing on global data sets of several million phases. To demonstrate its potential for non-linear tomography, we have applied the ray perturbation algorithm to a data set of 7.6 million P and pP phases used by Bijwaard et al. (1998) for linearized tomography. This showed that the expected heterogeneity within the Earth’s mantle leads to significant non-linear effects on traveltimes for 10 per cent of the applied phases.

[1]  B. Kennett,et al.  Joint seismic tomography for bulk sound and shear wave speed in the Earth's mantle , 1998 .

[2]  T. Moser,et al.  Teleseismic delay times in a 3-D Earth and a new look at the S discrepancy , 1993 .

[3]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  A fast algorithm for two-point seismic ray tracing , 1987 .

[4]  Fast, efficient calculation of rays and travel times with ray perturbation theory , 1996 .

[5]  Raul Madariaga,et al.  Seismic waveform modeling in heterogeneous media by ray perturbation theory , 1987 .

[6]  David Gubbins,et al.  Three-dimensional seismic ray tracing , 1977 .

[7]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes , 1995 .

[8]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Ray bending revisited , 1992 .

[9]  J. Vidale Finite-difference calculation of travel times , 1988 .

[10]  P. Podvin,et al.  Finite difference computation of traveltimes in very contrasted velocity models: a massively parallel approach and its associated tools , 1991 .

[11]  T. Moser Shortest path calculation of seismic rays , 1991 .

[12]  Harmen Bijwaard,et al.  Closing the gap between regional and global travel time tomography , 1998 .

[13]  Roel Snieder,et al.  The ambiguity in ray perturbation theory , 1993 .

[14]  Gilles Lambaré,et al.  3D multivalued travel time and amplitude maps , 1996 .

[15]  M. Kvasnička,et al.  3-D network ray tracing , 1994 .

[16]  J. Vidale Finite‐difference calculation of traveltimes in three dimensions , 1990 .

[17]  J. Virieux Fast and accurate ray tracing by Hamiltonian perturbation , 1991 .

[18]  J. Virieux,et al.  Ray tracing for earthquake location in laterally heterogeneous media , 1988 .

[19]  E. Engdahl,et al.  Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[20]  Shutaro Sekine,et al.  Pseudo-bending method for three-dimensional seismic ray tracing in a spherical earth with discontinuities , 1998 .

[21]  Victor Pereyra,et al.  Solving two-point seismic-ray tracing problems in a heterogeneous medium. Part 1. A general adaptive finite difference method , 1980 .

[22]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Ray perturbation theory for traveltimes and ray paths in 3-D heterogeneous media , 1992 .