Mirror Writing: Learning, Transfer, and Implications for Internal Inverse Models.

In a study of the effects of practicing mirror writing, the effects of transfer to the nonpracticed hand and to nonpracticed phrases were assessed in 185 students. Large transfer effects were observed. An interpretation of those effects is based on a suggestion that the learning led to the creation of a new internal inverse model (or a modification of a pre-existent model) mapping the space of task variables onto the space of internal variables.

[1]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Computational schemes and neural network models for formulation and control of multijoint arm trajectory , 1990 .

[3]  Elliot Saltzman,et al.  Levels of sensorimotor representation , 1979 .

[4]  Otmar Bock,et al.  Control of arm movements in a 2-dimensional pointing task , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  T. W. Cook Studies in cross education: II. Further experiments in mirror tracing the star-shaped maze. , 1933 .

[6]  C. S. Harris Adaptation to Displaced Vision: Visual, Motor, or Proprioceptive Change? , 1963, Science.

[7]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  The effects of practice on movement reproduction: Implications for models of motor control , 1996 .

[9]  M. Raibert Motor Control and Learning by the State Space Model , 1977 .

[10]  H. Imamizu,et al.  The locus of visual-motor learning at the task or manipulator level: implications from intermanual transfer. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  M. Kawato,et al.  The cerebellum and VOR/OKR learning models , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  J. Hollerbach Computers, brains and the control of movement , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  A. G. Feldman Once More on the Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis (λ Model) for Motor Control , 1986 .

[14]  M. Kawato,et al.  Internal representations of the motor apparatus: implications from generalization in visuomotor learning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  M. Kawato,et al.  Adaptive internal model of intrinsic kinematics involved in learning an aiming task. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Strategies for the control of voluntary movements with one mechanical degree of freedom , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  T. W. Cook Studies in cross education. I. Mirror tracing the star-shaped maze. , 1933 .

[18]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Learning arm kinematics and dynamics. , 1989, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Computational Schemes and Neural Network Models for Formation and Control of Multijoint Arm Trajectory , 1995 .

[20]  M. Latash Control of human movement , 1993 .

[21]  Loukia D. Loukopoulos,et al.  Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. , 1995, Psychological review.

[22]  M M Cohen,et al.  Continuous versus Terminal Visual Feedback in Prism Aftereffects , 1967, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  C. Bray Transfer of learning. , 1928 .