Abstract Regarding techniques used to evaluate daylighting illuminances, recent years have seen a steady increase in the use of computer programs, owing to increased computer speed and memory capacity. Despite a rise in the amount of available daylighting data, even the latest programs on the market only use standard CIE and IES sky models; besides, input climatic data and calculation procedures used by these programs do not always lend themselves to easy comparison: consequently, in the presence of different results from the programs, it is not always clear which parameters are responsible for these differences. From what has been said above and in order to examine closely various daylighting problems, we can better understand the need to develop a software tool to analyse the influence exerted by the choice of different parameters and calculation models on final results. As regards the various daylighting components (direct-from-sky, direct-from-sun, internally-reflected and externally-reflected), this paper is concerned with the direct-from-sky component, since it is essential for the internally-reflected component calculation. In particular, the procedure which has been developed calculates the direct-from-sky illuminance component on the work plane and on the other interior surfaces that make up the room. Exterior illuminances on unobstructed horizontal and vertical surfaces are also calculated, because they are necessary for the calculation of the externally-reflected component and useful for the reliability evaluation of simplified methods for the calculation of interior illuminances (daylight factor method and lumen input method). The computer program, named De-Light, has been developed in Visual Basic, an object-oriented program language, in order to obtain the greatest flexibility in input and output procedures. In this paper, following a description of the program, we compare the results obtained by De-Light with those obtained by two of the most common and reliable daylighting computer programs, Superlite 2.0 and Lumen Micro 7.1.
[1]
S. Treado,et al.
Measurements of Sky Luminance, Sky Illuminance, and Horizontal Solar Radiation
,
1983
.
[2]
Richard Kittler,et al.
Luminance distribution characteristics of homogeneous skies: a measurement and prediction strategy
,
1985
.
[3]
Paul J. Littlefair,et al.
The luminance distribution of an average sky
,
1981
.
[4]
F. C. Hooper,et al.
A Model for the Angular Distribution of Sky Radiance
,
1979
.
[5]
Joseph B. Murdoch,et al.
Determination of Total External Illuminance on a Sloped Surface from Sunlight and Skylight
,
1983
.
[7]
J. Michalsky,et al.
Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance
,
1990
.
[8]
A. W. Harrison.
Directional sky luminance versus cloud cover and solar position
,
1991
.
[9]
James A. Love,et al.
Daylighting Estimation under Real Skies: A Comparison of Full-Scale Photometry, Model Photometry, and Computer Simulation
,
1991
.
[10]
Stephen Selkowitz,et al.
Zenith luminance and sky luminance distributions for daylighting calculations
,
1984
.
[11]
Richard Perez,et al.
Modeling Sky Luminance Angular Distribution for Real Sky Conditions: Experimental Evaluation of Existing Algorithms
,
1992
.
[12]
Sergio Sibilio,et al.
Sky luminance models: Sensitivity to sky-dome subdivision
,
1996
.
[13]
S. Selkowitz,et al.
Daylight availability as a function of atmospheric conditions
,
1983
.
[14]
P. Littlefair.
The luminous efficacy of daylight: a review
,
1985
.