Can people memorize multilevel building as volumetric map? A study of multilevel atrium building

The question of whether multilevel buildings are memorized as volumetric map or collection of floors is central to spatial cognition and wayfinding studies about multilevel buildings. The stacked-floor buildings used in previous studies may limit people’s ability to integrate floors into a volumetric mental map. In this study, we assessed wayfinding and cognitive performances of 31 participants in a multilevel shopping mall with five atriums which provided adequate visual access and smooth floor transitions. (1) In the wayfinding task, we observed path choice for 31 participants in this mall. The participants’ choice for all path segments, also vertical path segments, clearly gravitated toward the most accessible spaces in the whole building, rather than most accessible space within individual floors. (2) Participants were also asked to identify the locations where they can see maximum number of stores. The identified locations can be reliably predicted by objectively measured three-dimensional visibility information, but not two-dimensional visibility information. (3) In the pointing task, participants can accurately point to out-of-sight targets in the same floor and in the different floor, in both azimuth and elevation direction. In sum, those findings suggest that people can memorize a multilevel atrium building as a volumetric map. This study also demonstrates the usefulness of developing three-dimensional configurational variables to explain human spatial behavior and spatial cognition.

[1]  D. R. Montello A New Framework for Understanding the Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge in Large-Scale Environments , 1998 .

[2]  Alasdair Turner,et al.  Analysing the Visual Dynamics of Spatial Morphology , 2003 .

[3]  Nicholas A. Giudice,et al.  The effects of 2D and 3D maps on learning virtual multi-level indoor environments , 2013, MapInteract '13.

[4]  Alexandre G. de Barros,et al.  Quantifying and validating measures of airport terminal wayfinding , 2008 .

[5]  B. Kuipers,et al.  The Skeleton In The Cognitive Map , 2003 .

[6]  B. Hillier,et al.  The Social Logic of Space , 1984 .

[7]  J. Peponis,et al.  Finding the Building in Wayfinding , 1990 .

[8]  D. R. Montello,et al.  Integrating Knowledge of Vertically Aligned Large-Scale Spaces , 1993 .

[9]  Itzhak Omer,et al.  The implications of inter-visibility between landmarks on wayfinding performance: An investigation using a virtual urban environment , 2007, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[10]  K. Jeffery,et al.  A framework for three-dimensional navigation research , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  B. Hillier,et al.  Rejoinder to Carlo Ratti , 2004 .

[12]  A. Turner,et al.  From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space , 2001 .

[13]  Craig Zimring,et al.  Linking Objective Measures Of Space To Cognition And Action , 2003 .

[14]  Jan M. Wiener,et al.  From Space Syntax to Space Semantics: A Behaviorally and Perceptually Oriented Methodology for the Efficient Description of the Geometry and Topology of Environments , 2008 .

[15]  Tasos Varoudis,et al.  Beyond two dimensions: Architecture through three-dimensional visibility graph analysis , 2014 .

[16]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[17]  Markus Knauff,et al.  Up the down staircase : Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings , 2006 .

[18]  A. Siegel,et al.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. , 1975, Advances in child development and behavior.

[19]  Jacques Droulez,et al.  How does horizontal and vertical navigation influence spatial memory of multifloored environments? , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Yi Lu,et al.  Exhibition Visitors are Sensitive to Patterns of Display Covisibility , 2014 .

[21]  M. Benedikt,et al.  To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields , 1979 .

[22]  Yi Lu,et al.  Developing Visibility Analysis for a Retail Store: A Pilot Study in a Bookstore , 2015 .

[23]  Craig Zimring,et al.  Can Intensive Care Staff See Their Patients? An Improved Visibility Analysis Methodology , 2012 .

[24]  T. Gärling,et al.  Orientation in buildings: Effects of familiarity, visual access, and orientation aids. , 1983 .

[25]  William H. K. Lam,et al.  Wayfinding in the passenger terminal of Hong Kong International Airport , 2003 .

[26]  C. Ratti Rejoinder to Hillier and Penn , 2004 .

[27]  William J. Cook,et al.  Human Orientation in Transportation Terminals , 1980 .

[28]  Saif Haq Investigating the Syntax Line: Configurational Properties and Cognitive Correlates , 2003 .

[29]  M L Bobrow,et al.  On planning and design. , 1976, Hospital forum.

[30]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Spatial Memory of Real Environments, Virtual Environments, and Maps , 2004 .

[31]  C. Zimring,et al.  Just Down The Road A Piece , 2003 .

[32]  T. Gärling,et al.  Orientation in buildings: effects of familiarity, visual access, and orientation aids. , 1983, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  C. Ratti Space Syntax: Some Inconsistencies , 2004 .