Vulnerability analysis for large-scale and congested road networks with demand uncertainty

To assess the vulnerability of congested road networks, the commonly used full network scan approach is to evaluate all possible scenarios of link closure using a form of traffic assignment. This approach can be computationally burdensome and may not be viable for identifying the most critical links in large-scale networks. In this study, an “impact area” vulnerability analysis approach is proposed to evaluate the consequences of a link closure within its impact area instead of the whole network. The proposed approach can significantly reduce the search space for determining the most critical links in large-scale networks. In addition, a new vulnerability index is introduced to examine properly the consequences of a link closure. The effects of demand uncertainty and heterogeneous travellers’ risk-taking behaviour are explicitly considered. Numerical results for two different road networks show that in practice the proposed approach is more efficient than traditional full scan approach for identifying the same set of critical links. Numerical results also demonstrate that both stochastic demand and travellers’ risk-taking behaviour have significant impacts on network vulnerability analysis, especially under high network congestion and large demand variations. Ignoring their impacts can underestimate the consequences of link closures and misidentify the most critical links.

[1]  Michael A. P. Taylor,et al.  Critical Transport Infrastructure in Urban Areas: Impacts of Traffic Incidents Assessed Using Accessibility-Based Network Vulnerability Analysis , 2008 .

[2]  H. J. Van Zuylen,et al.  Comparison of link-level robustness indicators , 2007 .

[3]  Anthony Chen,et al.  Network-based Accessibility Measures for Vulnerability Analysis of Degradable Transportation Networks , 2007 .

[4]  Hong Kam Lo,et al.  Degradable transport network: Travel time budget of travelers with heterogeneous risk aversion , 2006 .

[5]  H. J. Van Zuylen,et al.  The Influence of Spillback Modelling when Assessing Consequences of Blockings in a Road Network , 2008, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[6]  Glen M. D'Este,et al.  Application of Accessibility Based Methods for Vulnerability Analysis of Strategic Road Networks , 2006 .

[7]  Fumitaka Kurauchi,et al.  Network Evaluation Based on Connectivity Vulnerability , 2009 .

[8]  Y Iida,et al.  Transportation Network Analysis , 1997 .

[9]  Martin L. Hazelton,et al.  Estimation of origin-destination matrices from link flows on uncongested networks , 2000 .

[10]  Tom Petersen,et al.  Importance and Exposure in Road Network Vulnerability Analysis , 2006 .

[11]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Modeling s-t path availability to support disaster vulnerability assessment of network infrastructure , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[12]  Yu Nie,et al.  Modeling heterogeneous risk-taking behavior in route choice , 2011 .

[13]  C. Spearman The proof and measurement of association between two things. , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[14]  Hong Kam Lo,et al.  Stability and attraction domains of traffic equilibria in a day-to-day dynamical system formulation , 2010 .

[15]  L. Mattsson,et al.  Vulnerability : A model-based case study of the road network in Stockholm , 2007 .

[16]  Bi Yu Chen,et al.  An efficient solution algorithm for solving multi-class reliability-based traffic assignment problem , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[17]  Qingquan Li,et al.  Finding Reliable Shortest Paths in Road Networks Under Uncertainty , 2013 .

[18]  Bi Yu Chen,et al.  Reliable shortest path finding in stochastic networks with spatial correlated link travel times , 2012, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[19]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[20]  Xing Wu,et al.  Modeling Heterogeneous Risk-Taking Behavior in Route Choice: A Stochastic Dominance Approach , 2011 .

[21]  M A P Taylor,et al.  Network Vulnerability: An Approach to Reliability Analysis at the Level of National Strategic Transport Networks , 2003 .

[22]  Mauricio Sánchez-Silva,et al.  Vulnerability analysis of highway networks, methodology and case study , 2001 .

[23]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Demand-Driven Traffic Assignment Problem Based on Travel Time Reliability , 2006 .

[24]  Anthony Chen,et al.  Computational study of state-of-the-art path-based traffic assignment algorithms , 2002, Math. Comput. Simul..

[25]  Robert B. Dial,et al.  A path-based user-equilibrium traffic assignment algorithm that obviates path storage and enumeration , 2006 .

[26]  Agachai Sumalee,et al.  Partition-based Algorithm for Estimating Transportation Network Reliability with Dependent Link Failures , 2008 .

[27]  Henry X. Liu,et al.  Unexpected Cause, Unexpected Effect: Empirical Observations of Twin Cities Traffic Behavior after the I-35W Bridge Collapse and Reopening , 2009 .

[28]  W. Lam,et al.  MODELING AIR PASSENGER TRAVEL BEHAVIOR ON AIRPORT GROUND ACCESS MODE CHOICES , 2008 .

[29]  Hong K. Lo,et al.  Doubly uncertain transportation network: Degradable capacity and stochastic demand , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  The Value of Time and Reliability: Measurement from a Value Pricing Experiment , 2001 .

[31]  Agachai Sumalee,et al.  Modeling impacts of adverse weather conditions on a road network with uncertainties in demand and supply , 2008 .