Integrating Structure and Dynamics in Personality Assessment: First Steps Toward the Development and Validation of a Personality Dynamics Diary

Both theories and cutting-edge research highlight the dynamic nature of personality and personality pathology, thereby posing significant challenges for an exclusively between-person, trait-based approach to personality assessment. In a series of 3 studies, we explored the viability of integrating within-person, dynamic aspects into clinical personality assessment by means of daily dairy methods. In the 1st study, 314 students filled out a 73-item questionnaire capturing daily behaviors and situation experiences across 7−10 consecutive days. We used multilevel exploratory factor analyses to construct a shortened version, the Personality Dynamics Diary (PDD). In the 2nd study, the PDD was applied in a sample of 77 psychotherapy inpatients across 40 days, on average. In the 3rd study, 35 psychotherapy outpatients as well as their therapists judged the clinical utility of a smartphone version of the PDD. Taken together, we were able to construct a relatively brief self-report measure that assesses major dimensions of within- and between-person differences of situations and behaviors in daily life with acceptable reliability. Application in clinical samples provided further evidence for the reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the PDD but also highlighted possible obstacles in clinical practice as well as the need for further replication and refinement. We conclude that daily diary methods have the potential to integrate within- and between-person approaches to personality assessment. By applying measures like the PDD, clinicians may gain insight into the psychological mechanisms that give rise to, and maintain, a person’s maladaptive dispositions and ultimately find individualized leverage points for targeted therapeutic interventions.

[1]  David M. Almeida,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Resilience and Vulnerability to Daily Stressors Assessed via Diary Methods , 2022 .

[2]  Joel Paris,et al.  Quarrelsome behavior in borderline personality disorder: influence of behavioral and affective reactivity to perceptions of others. , 2013, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  D. Zuroff,et al.  Assessing interpersonal perceptions using the interpersonal grid. , 2005, Psychological assessment.

[4]  A. Wright,et al.  Stability and fluctuation of personality disorder features in daily life. , 2016, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  R. Krueger,et al.  The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. , 2014, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[6]  Ronald Metoyer,et al.  Capturing Intraindividual Variation and Covariation Constructs: Using Multiple Time-Scales to Assess Construct Reliability and Construct Stability , 2014 .

[7]  R. Krueger,et al.  The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits: findings from two German-speaking samples. , 2014, Journal of personality disorders.

[8]  W. Fleeson,et al.  The structure of borderline personality disorder symptoms: a multi-method, multi-sample examination. , 2014, Personality disorders.

[9]  J. Os,et al.  A therapeutic application of the experience sampling method in the treatment of depression: a randomized controlled trial , 2014, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[10]  D. Borsboom,et al.  Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  S. Haynes,et al.  Idiographic assessment: conceptual and psychometric foundations of individualized behavioral assessment. , 2009, Clinical psychology review.

[12]  D. Watson,et al.  Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5 , 2011, Psychological Medicine.

[13]  Briana N Sprague,et al.  Bridging the Nomothetic and Idiographic Approaches to the Analysis of Clinical Data , 2016, Assessment.

[14]  Aaron J Fisher,et al.  Enhancing the Personalization of Psychotherapy With Dynamic Assessment and Modeling , 2016, Assessment.

[15]  Keith H. Nuechterlein,et al.  An Illustration of Multilevel Factor Analysis , 2005, Journal of personality assessment.

[16]  T. Trull,et al.  Measuring impulsivity in daily life: the momentary impulsivity scale. , 2014, Psychological assessment.

[17]  Michael B First,et al.  Clinical Utility of Five Dimensional Systems for Personality Diagnosis: A “Consumer Preference” Study , 2008, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[18]  Matthias Ziegler,et al.  The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: a taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Aaron J Fisher,et al.  Toward a dynamic model of psychological assessment: Implications for personalized care. , 2015, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[20]  Wolfgang Lutz,et al.  Using network analysis for the prediction of treatment dropout in patients with mood and anxiety disorders: A methodological proof-of-concept study , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[21]  A Contingency-Oriented Approach to Understanding Borderline Personality Disorder: Situational Triggers and Symptoms. , 2015, Journal of personality disorders.

[22]  Stephanie T. Lane,et al.  Focusing Personality Assessment on the Person: Modeling General, Shared, and Person Specific Processes in Personality and Psychopathology , 2019, Psychological assessment.

[23]  Patrick Gallagher,et al.  The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  O. John,et al.  Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. , 2008 .

[25]  E. Hamaker,et al.  Using a Few Snapshots to Distinguish Mountains from Waves: Weak Factorial Invariance in the Context of Trait-State Research , 2017, Multivariate behavioral research.

[26]  A. Wright,et al.  A metastructural model of mental disorders and pathological personality traits , 2015, Psychological Medicine.

[27]  Claudia D. van Borkulo,et al.  Personalized Network Modeling in Psychopathology: The Importance of Contemporaneous and Temporal Connections , 2018, Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[28]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. , 2014, Psychological methods.

[29]  V. Benet‐Martínez,et al.  Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  P. Costa,et al.  Integrating normal and abnormal personality structure: the Five-Factor Model. , 2012, Journal of Personality.

[31]  W. Mischel,et al.  A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. , 1995, Psychological review.

[32]  Morten Moshagen,et al.  Sample Size Requirements of the Robust Weighted Least Squares Estimator , 2014 .

[33]  W. Fleeson,et al.  Whole Trait Theory. , 2015, Journal of research in personality.

[34]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[35]  K. Markon,et al.  Modeling psychopathology structure: a symptom-level analysis of Axis I and II disorders , 2009, Psychological Medicine.

[36]  Michael J. Roche,et al.  The circumplex structure of interpersonal sensitivities. , 2011, Journal of personality.

[37]  W. Fleeson Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: traits as density distribution of states. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  M. Wichers,et al.  Moving From Static to Dynamic Models of the Onset of Mental Disorder: A Review , 2017, JAMA psychiatry.

[39]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  The New Person-Specific Paradigm in Psychology , 2009 .

[40]  Gordon W. Allport,et al.  The person in psychology : selected essays , 1968 .

[41]  Johannes Zimmermann,et al.  An Integrative Conceptual Framework for Assessing Personality and Personality Pathology , 2011 .

[42]  T. Shackelford,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Personality and Individual Differences: Volume III: Applications of Personality and IndividualDifferences , 2018 .

[43]  R. Krueger,et al.  Connecting Personality Structure and Dynamics: Towards a More Evidence-Based and Clinically Useful Diagnostic Scheme. , 2015, Journal of personality disorders.

[44]  Kathleen M. Gates,et al.  Examining the Dynamic Structure of Daily Internalizing and Externalizing Behavior at Multiple Levels of Analysis , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[45]  Ulrich Ebner-Priemer,et al.  Ambulatory assessment. , 2013, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[46]  K. Petrowski,et al.  Factor structure and psychometric properties of the trier inventory for chronic stress (TICS) in a representative german sample , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[47]  C. DeYoung Cybernetic Big Five Theory. , 2015 .

[48]  R. Velleman,et al.  Initial reliability and validity of a new measure of perceived social support for family members of problem substance users , 2014 .

[49]  Lian van der Krieke,et al.  Temporal Dynamics of Health and Well-Being: A Crowdsourcing Approach to Momentary Assessments and Automated Generation of Personalized Feedback , 2016, Psychosomatic medicine.

[50]  David Watson,et al.  The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies , 2017, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[51]  Philippe Delespaul,et al.  Beyond DSM and ICD: introducing “precision diagnosis” for psychiatry using momentary assessment technology , 2013, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[52]  S. Herpertz,et al.  The social-cognitive basis of personality disorders , 2014, Current opinion in psychiatry.

[53]  D. Zuroff,et al.  Personality Processes and Individual Differences Flux, Pulse, and Spin: Dynamic Additions to the Personality Lexicon , 2022 .

[54]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  Denny Borsboom,et al.  Measurement invariance within and between individuals: a distinct problem in testing the equivalence of intra- and inter-individual model structures , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[56]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[57]  S. Lilienfeld,et al.  A Review of Systems for Psychology and Psychiatry: Adaptive Systems, Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY–5), and the DSM–5 , 2014, Journal of personality assessment.

[58]  Eshkol Rafaeli,et al.  The rejection-rage contingency in borderline personality disorder. , 2011, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[59]  Nilam Ram,et al.  Enriching Psychological Assessment Using a Person-Specific Analysis of Interpersonal Processes in Daily Life , 2014, Assessment.

[60]  D. Moskowitz Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. , 1994 .

[61]  Sang Eun Woo,et al.  CAPTION-ing the Situation: A Lexically-Derived Taxonomy of Psychological Situation Characteristics , 2017, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[62]  J Foote,et al.  Initial reliability and validity of a new retrospective measure of child abuse and neglect. , 1994, The American journal of psychiatry.

[63]  A. Wright,et al.  Daily Interpersonal and Affective Dynamics in Personality Disorder. , 2015, Journal of personality disorders.

[64]  Nicolas A. Brown,et al.  The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. , 2015, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  R. Krueger,et al.  An Interpersonal Analysis of Pathological Personality Traits in DSM-5 , 2012, Assessment.

[66]  E. Hamaker,et al.  No Time Like the Present , 2017 .