Non-Graphical Solutions for Cattell’s Scree Test

Most of the strategies that have been proposed to determine the number of components that account for the most variation in a principal components analysis of a correlation matrix rely on the analysis of the eigenvalues and on numerical solutions. The Cattell's scree test is a graphical strategy with a nonnumerical solution to determine the number of components to retain. Like Kaiser's rule, this test is one of the most frequently used strategies for determining the number of components to retain. However, the graphical nature of the scree test does not definitively establish the number of components to retain. To circumvent this issue, some numerical solutions are proposed, one in the spirit of Cattell's work and dealing with the scree part of the eigenvalues plot, and one focusing on the elbow part of this plot. A simulation study compares the efficiency of these solutions to those of other previously proposed methods. Extensions to factor analysis are possible and may be particularly useful with many low-dimensional components. Several strategies have been proposed to determine the num- ber of components that account for the most variation in a principal components analysis of a correlation matrix. Most of these rely on the analysis of the eigenvalues of the corre- lation matrix and on numerical solutions. For example, Kaiser's eigenvalue greater than one rule (Guttman, 1954; Kaiser, 1960), parallel analysis (Buja & Eyuboglu, 1992; Horn, 1965; Hoyle & Duvall, 2004), or hypothesis signifi- cance tests, like Bartlett's test (1950), make use of numerical criteria for comparison or statistical significance criteria. Independently of these numerical solutions, Cattell (1966) proposed the scree test, a graphical strategy to determine the number of components to retain. Along with the Kaiser's rule, the scree test is probably the most used strategy and it is included in almost all statistical software dealing with principal components analysis. Unfortunately, it is generally recognized that the graphical nature of the Cattell's scree test does not enable clear decision-making about the number of components to retain. The previously proposed non-graphical solutions for

[1]  Samuel B. Green,et al.  Evaluation of Parallel Analysis Methods for Determining the Number of Factors , 2010 .

[2]  Sun-Joo Cho,et al.  Accuracy of the Parallel Analysis Procedure With Polychoric Correlations , 2009 .

[3]  A. Formann,et al.  Performance of Parallel Analysis in Retrieving Unidimensionality in the Presence of Binary Data , 2009 .

[4]  Samuel DiGangi,et al.  Assessing unidimensionality: A comparison of Rasch modeling, Parallel analysis, and TETRAD , 2007 .

[5]  Pedro M. Valero-Mora,et al.  Determining the Number of Factors to Retain in EFA: An easy-to-use computer program for carrying out Parallel Analysis , 2007 .

[6]  Sungjin Hong,et al.  Bootstrap scree tests: a Monte Carlo simulation and applications to published data. , 2006, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[7]  Pere J. Ferrando,et al.  FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[8]  Chung-Ping Cheng,et al.  Parallel Analysis with Unidimensional Binary Data , 2005 .

[9]  David Kaplan,et al.  The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences , 2004 .

[10]  Rick H. Hoyle,et al.  Determining the Number of Factors in Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 2004 .

[11]  André Beauducel,et al.  Problems with parallel analysis in data sets with oblique simple structure , 2001 .

[12]  B P O'Connor,et al.  SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[13]  Wayne F. Velicer,et al.  Construct Explication through Factor or Component Analysis: A Review and Evaluation of Alternative Procedures for Determining the Number of Factors or Components , 2000 .

[14]  Keith Zoski,et al.  An Objective Counterpart to the Visual Scree Test for Factor Analysis: The Standard Error Scree , 1996 .

[15]  S. Jurs.  Using Linear Regression To Determine the Number of Factors To Retain in Factor Analysis and the Number of Issues To Retain in Delphi Studies and Other Surveys. , 1993 .

[16]  A. Buja,et al.  Remarks on Parallel Analysis. , 1992, Multivariate behavioral research.

[17]  Bruce Thompson,et al.  Program Facstrap: A Program that Computes Bootstrap Estimates of Factor Structure , 1988 .

[18]  Norman Cliff,et al.  The eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule and the reliability of components. , 1988 .

[19]  W. Velicer,et al.  Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. , 1986 .

[20]  J. Thomas King,et al.  Introduction to numerical computation , 1984 .

[21]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Advanced Theory of Statistics: Volume 1, Distribution Theory , 1978 .

[22]  W. Velicer.  Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations , 1976 .

[23]  Lloyd G. Humphreys,et al.  Latent roots of random data correlation matrices with squared multiple correlations on the diagonal: A monte carlo study , 1976 .

[24]  M. Browne.  A comparison of factor analytic techniques , 1968, Psychometrika.

[25]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[26]  P. Odell,et al.  A Numerical Procedure to Generate a Sample Covariance Matrix , 1966 .

[27]  George A. Anderson,et al.  An Asymptotic Expansion for the Distribution of the Latent Roots of the Estimated Covariance Matrix , 1965 .

[28]  J. Horn.  A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.

[29]  A. E. Maxwell,et al.  Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. , 1964 .

[30]  H. Harman.  Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[31]  H. Kaiser.  The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[32]  D. Lawley.  TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE LATENT ROOTS OF COVARIANCE AND CORRELATION MATRICES , 1956 .

[33]  L. Guttman.  Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis , 1954 .

[34]  M. Bartlett.  TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE IN FACTOR ANALYSIS , 1950 .