Joint relation of experience and ability with job performance: Test of three hypotheses.

Data from four different jobs (TV = 1,474) were used to evaluate three hypotheses of the joint relation of job experience and general mental ability to job performance as measured by (a) work sample measures, (b) job knowledge measures, and (c) supervisory ratings of job performance. The divergence hypothesis predicts an increasing difference and the convergence hypothesis predicts a decreasing difference in the job performance of highand low-mental-ability employees as employees gain increasing experience on the job. The noninteractive hypothesis, by contrast, predicts that the performance difference will be constant over time. For all three measures of job performance, results supported the noninteractive hypothesis. Also, consistent with the noninteractive hypothesis, correlational analyses showed essentially constant validities for general mental ability (measured earlier) out to 5 years of experience on the job. In addition to their theoretical implications, these findings have an important practical implication: They indicate that the concerns that employment test validities may decrease over time, complicating estimates of selection utility, are probably unwarranted.

[1]  L. Humphreys,et al.  POSTDICTION STUDY OF THE GRADUATE RECORD EXAMINATION AND EIGHT SEMESTERS OF COLLEGE GRADES1 , 1973 .

[2]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  Within-task intercorrelations of skilled performance: Implications for predicting individual differences? A comment on Henry & Hulin, 1987. , 1989 .

[3]  Jacob Cohen.  Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve components. , 1978 .

[4]  Robert Vineberg,et al.  Prediction of Job Performance: Review of Military Studies , 1982 .

[5]  John E. Hunter,et al.  FORTY QUESTIONS ABOUT VALIDITY GENERALIZATION AND META‐ANALYSIS , 1985 .

[6]  R. Nickerson,et al.  Teaching Thinking Skills , 1986 .

[7]  Michael P. Kirsch,et al.  METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICS , 1984 .

[8]  Charles L. Hulin,et al.  An experimental evaluation of a temporal decay in the prediction of performance , 1973 .

[9]  R L Thorndike,et al.  The Central Role of General Ability in Prediction. , 1985, Multivariate behavioral research.

[10]  Owens Wa.  Age and mental abilities: a longitudinal study. , 1953 .

[11]  E A FLEISHMAN,et al.  Abilities at different stages of practice in rotary pursuit performance. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  Elaine N. Taylor.  Role of Selection and Growth in Performance of Experienced Men: Some Evidence from a Study of Four Army Jobs. , 1973 .

[13]  C. Hulin,et al.  Stability of skilled performance across time: Some generalizations and limitations on utilities. , 1987 .

[14]  Robert Vineberg,et al.  Performance in Four Army Jobs by Men at Different Aptitude (AFQT) levels: 3. The Relationship of (AFQT) and Job Experience to Job Performance , 1972 .

[15]  Michael A. McDaniel.  The evaluation of a causal model of job performance : the interrelationships of general mental ability, job experience and job performance , 1986 .

[16]  A. B. Blankenship,et al.  Prediction of vocational proficiency in three machine operations. , 1938 .

[17]  James S. Phillips,et al.  Concurrent and predictive validity designs: A critical reanalysis. , 1981 .

[18]  E. Ghiselli,et al.  Learning in accident reduction. , 1947, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Gregg B. Jackson,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies , 1982 .

[20]  E A FLEISHMAN,et al.  The relation between abilities and improvement with practice in a visual discrimination reaction task. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity. , 1979 .

[22]  E. Fleishman.  Attitude Versus Skill Factors In Work Group Productivity1 , 1965 .

[23]  Kenneth M. Wilson,et al.  A Review of Research on the Prediction of Academic Performance After the Freshman Year , 1983 .

[24]  C. McCauley,et al.  Extraordinary stability and ordinary predictability of academic success at the United States military academy , 1987 .

[25]  L. Humphreys.  The fleeting nature of the prediction of college academic success. , 1968, Journal of educational psychology.

[26]  Alice N. Outerbridge,et al.  Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance , 1986 .

[27]  Edward A. Bilodeau,et al.  Acquisition of Skill , 1967 .

[28]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations. , 1980 .

[29]  P. C. Smith,et al.  An investigation of the shape of learning curves for industrial motor tasks. , 1956 .

[30]  L. W. Ferugson.  Ability, interest, and aptitude. , 1960 .

[31]  Stephen E. Bemis.  Occupational validity of the general aptitude test battery. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  L. Humphreys,et al.  Predictions of Academic Performance in Graduate and Professional School , 1977 .

[33]  L. Humphreys,et al.  Predictability of Academic Grades for Students of High and Low Academic Promise , 1973 .

[34]  Jeanette N. Cleveland,et al.  Performance Measurement and Theory , 1983 .

[35]  Randall B. Dunham,et al.  Ability-skill relationships: An empirical explanation of change over time , 1974 .