Upper bounds for the security of two distributed-phase reference protocols of quantum cryptography

The differential-phase-shift (DPS) and the coherent-one-way (COW) are among the most practical protocols for quantum cryptography, and are therefore the object of fast-paced experimental developments. The assessment of their security is also a challenge for theorists: the existing tools, that allow to prove security against the most general attacks, do not apply to these two protocols in any straightforward way. We present new upper bounds for their security in the limit of large distances ( d & 50 km with typical values in optical fibers) by considering a large class of collective attacks, namely those in which the adversary attaches ancillary quantum systems to each pulse or to each pair of pulses. We introduce also two modified versions of the COW protocol, which may prove more robust than the original one.

[1]  Renato Renner,et al.  Security of quantum key distribution , 2005, Ausgezeichnete Informatikdissertationen.

[2]  H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci,et al.  Incoherent and coherent eavesdropping in the six-state protocol of quantum cryptography , 1998, quant-ph/9807041.

[3]  Norbert Lütkenhaus,et al.  Zero-error attacks and detection statistics in the coherent one-way protocol for quantum cryptography , 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[4]  Hoi-Kwong Lo,et al.  Sequential attacks against differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution with weak coherent states , 2007, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[5]  Toyohiro Tsurumaru.  Sequential attack with intensity modulation on the differential-phase-shift quantum-key-distribution protocol , 2007 .

[6]  Yoshihisa Yamamoto,et al.  Differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution using coherent light , 2003 .

[7]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Quantum cryptography without Bell's theorem. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[8]  Yoshihisa Yamamoto,et al.  Differential phase shift quantum key distribution. , 2002 .

[9]  D. Bruß.  Optimal Eavesdropping in Quantum Cryptography with Six States , 1998, quant-ph/9805019.

[10]  Sanders,et al.  Limitations on practical quantum cryptography , 2000, Physical review letters.

[11]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[12]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Quantum cryptography protocols robust against photon number splitting attacks for weak laser pulse implementations. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[13]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[14]  Nicolas Cerf,et al.  From quantum cloning to quantum key distribution with continuous variables: a review (Invited) , 2007 .

[15]  Yoshihisa Yamamoto,et al.  Security of differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution against individual attacks , 2005, quant-ph/0508112.

[16]  Ekert,et al.  Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[17]  Anders Karlsson,et al.  Security of quantum key distribution using d-level systems. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[18]  Differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution with an extended degree of freedom. , 2006, Optics letters.

[19]  N. Lütkenhaus.  Security against individual attacks for realistic quantum key distribution , 2000 .

[20]  V. Scarani,et al.  Fast and simple one-way quantum key distribution , 2005, quant-ph/0506097.

[21]  R. Renner.  Symmetry of large physical systems implies independence of subsystems , 2007 .

[22]  Kyo Inoue,et al.  Robustness of differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution against photon-number-splitting attack , 2005 .

[23]  Xiang‐Bin Wang,et al.  Beating the PNS attack in practical quantum cryptography , 2004 .

[24]  A. Winter,et al.  Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[25]  Xiongfeng Ma,et al.  Decoy state quantum key distribution. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[26]  Won-Young Hwang.  Quantum key distribution with high loss: toward global secure communication. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[27]  Sae Woo Nam,et al.  Quantum key distribution over a 40-dB channel loss using superconducting single-photon detectors , 2007, 0706.0397.