An automated method to position prosthetic components within multiple anatomical spaces

The level of fit and fill of a stem in the host femur is the most critical factor for the mechanical stability and success of the prosthesis. It would be useful to have a simulation tool able to investigate the anatomical compatibility of a new implant in a large library of femoral anatomies in the early phases of the design process. In order to realise this tool, it is necessary to develop an automatic method for the positioning of the stem in a database of anatomies. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a method for the automatic positioning of the stem geometry in the anatomical CT dataset. Two different strategies were considered: a completely automatic registration technique and a semi-automatic method based on an anatomical referencing. The two procedures were compared to the manual positioning obtained by an expert surgeon in a set of nine CT datasets. For both methods in each femur the positioning and the orientation of the stem were good. The results showed a better level of fitting for the automatic method, while the shift of the hip joint centre was lower for the anatomical referencing technique. However, the anatomical referencing method requires a higher computational effort without being significantly better than the automatic method. For this reason, the automatic method should be chosen to develop the automatic positioning of a stem in a database of anatomies.

[1]  J Lund-Larsen,et al.  Determination of Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  H. Tullos,et al.  The anatomic basis of femoral component design. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  M. H. Fessy,et al.  Anatomical basis for the choice of the femoral implant in the total hip arthroplasty , 1997, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[4]  G. Gill,et al.  Racial variation in the proximal and distal femur: heritability and forensic utility. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  T Nishii,et al.  Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. , 1998, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[6]  T. Moilanen,et al.  Diversity of proximal femoral medullary canal. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  W. Hayes,et al.  Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae--a biomechanical investigation: I. Method and general patterns of variation. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.