Evaluation of a TG-43 compliant analytical dosimetry model in clinical 192Ir HDR brachytherapy treatment planning and assessment of the significance of source position and catheter reconstruction uncertainties.

A simple, time efficient, analytical model incorporating heterogeneities and body dimensions around a point 192Ir source is generalized for accurate dosimetry around commercially available 192Ir brachytherapy sources. The generalized model was verified in dosimetry of a clinical 192Ir high dose rate prostate monotherapy application, involving 16 catheters and 83 source dwell positions, through comparison with corresponding treatment planning system data. The computational time efficiency and accuracy of the proposed model allowed the assessment of the impact that uncertainties in source dwell positions and catheter reconstruction may have on dose distributions, and how these could potentially affect the clinical outcome. Results revealed that a 0.1 cm catheter reconstruction uncertainty and a 0.15 cm source position uncertainty along the catheter lead to a dose uncertainty of less than 2% for doses lower than 200% of the prescribed dose, reaching up to 5% for points lying in close proximity to the catheters. These uncertainties were found to have no impact (less than 1%) on dose volume histogram results of both the planning target volume and the urethra. A catheter reconstruction uncertainty as high as 0.2 cm results in a dose uncertainty greater than 2%, reaching up to 9%, only for points inside the 150% contour. However, even in this case, the impact on dose volume histogram calculations is less than 3%.

[1]  Ruqing Wang,et al.  Monte Carlo dosimetry of the VariSource high dose rate 192Ir source. , 1998, Medical physics.

[2]  L. Anderson,et al.  Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: Recommendations of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 43 , 1995 .

[3]  L. Sakelliou,et al.  Dose rate calculations around 192Ir brachytherapy sources using a Sievert integration model. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  J F Williamson,et al.  Monte Carlo aided dosimetry of the microselectron pulsed and high dose-rate 192Ir sources. , 1995, Medical physics.

[5]  D Baltas,et al.  Dosimetry comparison of 192Ir sources. , 2002, Medical physics.

[6]  D. Granero,et al.  Technical note: fitted dosimetric parameters of high dose-rate 192Ir sources according to the AAPM TG43 formalism. , 2003, Medical physics.

[7]  D. Baltas,et al.  Dosimetry of 192Ir wires for LDR interstitial brachytherapy following the AAPM TG-43 dosimetric formalism. , 2001, Medical physics.

[8]  F. Ballester,et al.  Fitted dosimetric parameters of high dose-rate 192Ir sources according to the AAPM TG43 formalism. , 2001, Medical physics.

[9]  C Kolotas,et al.  Catheter autoreconstruction in computed tomography based brachytherapy treatment planning. , 2000, Medical physics.

[10]  D Baltas,et al.  In vivo thermoluminescence dosimetry dose verification of transperineal 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy using CT-based planning for the treatment of prostate cancer. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  J. Williamson,et al.  Monte Carlo-aided dosimetry of a new high dose-rate brachytherapy source. , 1998, Medical physics.

[12]  J. Battista,et al.  A systematic study of imaging uncertainties and their impact on 125I prostate brachytherapy dose evaluation. , 2003, Medical physics.

[13]  Nikolaos K. Uzunoglu,et al.  CT-based software for 3-D localization and reconstruction in stepping source brachytherapy , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[14]  L. Sakelliou,et al.  Limitations of the point and line source approximations for the determination of geometry factors around brachytherapy sources. , 2000, Medical physics.

[15]  D. Baltas,et al.  An analytical dosimetry model as a step towards accounting for inhomogeneities and bounded geometries in 192Ir brachytherapy treatment planning. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  D Baltas,et al.  3D dose verification in 192Ir HDR prostate monotherapy using polymer gels and MRI. , 2003, Medical physics.

[17]  F Ballester,et al.  Monte Carlo dosimetry of the Buchler high dose rate 192Ir source , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Gary Luxton,et al.  Calculation of brachytherapy doses does not need TG-43 factorization. Against the proposition. , 2003, Medical physics.

[19]  L. Sakelliou,et al.  Monte Carlo dosimetry of 60Co HDR brachytherapy sources. , 2003, Medical physics.

[20]  P. Grimm,et al.  American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  N. Suchowerska,et al.  High dose-rate brachytherapy source localization: positional resolution using a diamond detector. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  D. Baltas,et al.  On the dosimetric accuracy of a Sievert integration model in the proximity of 192Ir HDR sources. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  E. Kouwenhoven,et al.  Monte Carlo dosimetry of a new 192Ir pulsed dose rate brachytherapy source. , 2000, Medical physics.

[24]  G. Gustafson,et al.  Phase II prospective study of the use of conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for the treatment of favorable stage prostate cancer: a feasibility report. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Sartaj Sahni,et al.  Leaf sequencing algorithms for segmented multileaf collimation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.