A new system for analyzing swim fin propulsion based on human kinematic data.

The use of swim fins has become popular in various water sport activities. While numerous models of swim fin with various innovative shapes have been subjectively designed, the exact influence of the fin characteristics on swimming performance is still much debated, and remains difficult to quantify. To date, the most common approach for evaluating swim fin propulsion is based on the study of "swimmer-fins" as a global system, where physiological and/or biomechanical responses are considered. However, reproducible swimming technique is difficult (or even impossible) to obtain on human body and may lead to discrepancies in data acquired between trials. In this study, we present and validate a new automat called HERMES which enables an evaluation of various swim fins during an adjustable, standardized and reproducible motion. This test bench reliably and accurately reproduces human fin-swimming motions, and gives resulting dynamic measurements at the ankle joint. Seven fins with various geometrical and mechanical characteristics were tested. For each swim fin, ankle force and hydromechanical efficiency (useful mechanical power output divided by mechanical power input delivered by the motors) were calculated. Efficiencies reported in our study were high (close to 70% for some swim fins) over a narrow range of Strouhal number (St) and peaks within the interval 0.2<St<0.4, as shown in previous studies on flying or swimming animals. Therefore, an interesting prospect in this work would be to accurately study the impact of adjustable fin kinematics and material (design and mechanical properties) on the wake structure and on efficiency.

[1]  R. Frassetto,et al.  Oxygen requirements in underwater swimming. , 1956, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  A. E. Minetti,et al.  An energy balance of front crawl , 2005, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[3]  Franz S. Hover,et al.  Effect of angle of attack profiles in flapping foil propulsion , 2004 .

[4]  Martin A. Passmore,et al.  Drag levels and energy requirements on a SCUBA diver , 2002 .

[5]  James G. Hay,et al.  A Hydrodynamic Study of the Oscillation Motion in Swimming , 1988 .

[6]  F. Fish,et al.  Strouhal numbers and optimization of swimming by odontocete cetaceans , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  Giangiacomo Minak Evaluation of the performances of free-diving fins , 2004 .

[8]  D. Winter Biomechanics of Human Movement , 1980 .

[9]  James Tangorra,et al.  Fish biorobotics: kinematics and hydrodynamics of self-propulsion , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  Robert G. McMurray Comparative Efficiencies of Conventional and Super-Swimfin Designs , 1977 .

[11]  Alberto E. Minetti,et al.  Economy and efficiency of swimming at the surface with fins of different size and stiffness , 2006, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[12]  N. Naraki,et al.  Maximum sustained fin-kick thrust in underwater swimming. , 1995, Undersea & hyperbaric medicine : journal of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc.

[13]  D R Pendergast,et al.  Evaluation of fins used in underwater swimming. , 2003, Undersea & hyperbaric medicine : journal of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, Inc.

[14]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Hydrodynamics of Fishlike Swimming , 2000 .

[15]  T Nomura,et al.  [Present studies on modern swimming (fin swimming and underwater swimming) in Japan]. , 1985, The Annals of physiological anthropology = Seiri Jinruigaku Kenkyukai kaishi.

[16]  D R Pendergast,et al.  Energetics of underwater swimming with SCUBA. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  J. L. Nayler Mathematical Biofluiddynamics. Sir James Lighthill. Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia. 281 pp. Illustrated. , 1976, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[18]  G Weltman,et al.  Thrust Forces in Underwater Swimming , 1965, Human factors.

[19]  S. Vogel,et al.  Life in Moving Fluids , 2020 .

[20]  Huub M. Toussaint,et al.  Biomechanical aspects of peak performance in human swimming , 2005 .

[21]  S. Vogel Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow , 1981 .

[22]  Eric Berton,et al.  How are Strouhal number, drag, and efficiency adjusted in high level underwater monofin-swimming? , 2007, Human movement science.

[23]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Adjustment to change in familiar and unfamiliar task constraints , 2009, Journal of sports sciences.

[24]  Benoit Bideau,et al.  A kinematic and dynamic comparison of surface and underwater displacement in high level monofin swimming. , 2009, Human movement science.

[25]  Frank E. Fish,et al.  Review of Dolphin Hydrodynamics and Swimming Performance , 1999 .

[26]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high power efficiency , 2003, Nature.

[27]  W. Hurford,et al.  Daily diving pattern of Korean and Japanese breath-hold divers (ama). , 1991, Undersea biomedical research.

[28]  P Zamparo,et al.  How fins affect the economy and efficiency of human swimming. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[29]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.