One size does not fit all: Establishing the need for targeted eco-feedback

Despite all improvements in buildings shell, equipment, and design, CO2 emissions from buildings are increasing. Since occupants spend more than 87% of their time indoors, they are inseparable and significant elements of building system dynamics. Hence, there is a great potential for energy efficiency in buildings using a wide range of programs such as intervention and eco-feedback. Despite the high level of individual differences and intra-class variability of occupants’ behaviors, the current state-of-the-art eco-feedback programs treat all the occupants uniformly and do not target and tailor the feedback. Therefore, it leaves an opportunity to increase the efficacy of eco-feedback systems through the designing of tailored and targeted programs. In this paper, we conducted a comprehensive analysis and tested hypotheses on occupants’ behavioral responses to a normative comparison feedback program, in addition to the impact of notifications on the level of engagement of each group of occupants. We categorized occupants who participated in the normative comparison feedback program into three groups (i.e. low, medium, and high energy consumers) based on their baseline energy consumption, and tested 9 hypotheses. A mixed-effect regression model (MRM) and a paired t-test was implemented to evaluate the proposed hypotheses. The hypotheses examine the variability of occupants’ responses under the same eco-feedback program, and the effectiveness of notifications on reinforcing occupants’ engagement in these programs. The contribution of this paper is two-fold: (1) reporting that the effectiveness of the notifications in eco-feedback programs are initially highly dependent on the type and the nature of the program, and then the interval and the content of the notification, and (2) demonstrating the variability of occupants’ behavioral responses under the same normative comparison eco-feedback program. These findings indicate the need for a shift in focus toward targeted and tailored feedback programs which treat occupants based on their characteristics. Moreover, they highlight the need for eco-feedback design, development, testing and implementation research that acknowledges and addresses differences in occupant responses to feedback.

[1]  Filipe Quintal,et al.  WATTSBurning: Design and Evaluation of an Innovative Eco-Feedback System , 2013, INTERACT.

[2]  Ray Yun.  Persistent Workplace Energy Savings and Awareness through Intelligent Dashboards: Monitoring, Advice, Comparison, Control and Automation , 2014 .

[3]  K. Ellegård,et al.  Visualizing energy consumption activities as a tool for making everyday life more sustainable , 2011 .

[4]  T. Sanquist,et al.  Lifestyle factors in U.S. residential electricity consumption , 2012 .

[5]  Mahmoud Alahmad,et al.  A Comparative Study of Three Feedback Devices for Residential Real-Time Energy Monitoring , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  Colin McKerracher,et al.  Energy consumption feedback in perspective: integrating Australian data to meta-analyses on in-home displays , 2013 .

[7]  J. Taylor,et al.  The impact of peer network position on electricity consumption in building occupant networks utilizing energy feedback systems , 2012 .

[8]  Jeong Tai Kim,et al.  The energy-saving effects of apartment residents’ awareness and behavior , 2012 .

[9]  I. Vassileva,et al.  Analytical comparison between electricity consumption and behavioral characteristics of Swedish households in rented apartments , 2012 .

[10]  Ian Ayres,et al.  Evidence from Two Large Field Experiments that Peer Comparison Feedback can Reduce Residential Energy Usage , 2009 .

[11]  Todd Rogers,et al.  How Long Do Treatment Effects Last? Persistence and Durability of a Descriptive Norms Intervention's Effect on Energy Conservation , 2012 .

[12]  John E. Taylor,et al.  BizWatts: A modular socio-technical energy management system for empowering commercial building occupants to conserve energy , 2014 .

[13]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[14]  Ruth Mugge,et al.  Washing when the sun is shining! How users interact with a household energy management system , 2013, Ergonomics.

[15]  P. Stern.  New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[16]  Li Shao,et al.  Promoting behaviour change through personalized energy feedback in offices , 2013 .

[17]  Yolande A. A. Strengers,et al.  Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life , 2011, CHI.

[18]  Hung-Ming Chen,et al.  Persuasive feedback model for inducing energy conservation behaviors of building users based on interaction with a virtual object , 2012 .

[19]  Ray Yun.  Persistent workplace plug-load energy savings and awareness through energy dashboards: eco-feedback, control, and automation , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[20]  Fulvio Corno,et al.  Home energy consumption feedback: A user survey , 2012 .

[21]  Vivian Loftness,et al.  Sustainability in the Workplace: Nine Intervention Techniques for Behavior Change , 2013, PERSUASIVE.

[22]  Philip M. Johnson,et al.  The Kukui Cup: A Dorm Energy Competition Focused on Sustainable Behavior Change and Energy Literacy , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  H. Lilliefors.  On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown , 1967 .

[24]  H. Allcott,et al.  Social Norms and Energy Conservation , 2011 .

[25]  Kevin Burchell,et al.  Energy Consumption Feedback: Engagement by Design , 2014, HCI.

[26]  Jaap Ham,et al.  The Power of Negative Feedback from an Artificial Agent to Promote Energy Saving Behavior , 2014, HCI.

[27]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms , 2007, Psychological science.

[28]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  The Hawthorne effect and energy awareness , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  S. Karjalainen.  Consumer preferences for feedback on household electricity consumption , 2011 .

[30]  Magali A. Delmas,et al.  Nonprice incentives and energy conservation , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Effects of real-time eco-feedback and organizational network dynamics on energy efficient behavior in commercial buildings , 2014 .

[32]  J. Thøgersen,et al.  Feedback on Household Electricity Consumption: Learning and Social Influence Processes , 2011 .

[33]  John M. Quigley,et al.  Energy literacy, awareness, and conservation behavior of residential households , 2013 .

[34]  Rory V. Jones,et al.  The socio-economic, dwelling and appliance related factors affecting electricity consumption in domestic buildings , 2015 .

[35]  Muhammad Imran,et al.  Individual energy use and feedback in an office setting: A field trial , 2013 .

[36]  M. Dekay,et al.  Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Filipe Quintal,et al.  The design of a hardware-software platform for long-term energy eco-feedback research , 2012, EICS '12.

[38]  Milind R. Naphade,et al.  The dubuque electricity portal: evaluation of a city-scale residential electricity consumption feedback system , 2013, CHI.

[39]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Response–relapse patterns of building occupant electricity consumption following exposure to personal, contextualized and occupant peer network utilization data , 2010 .

[40]  Donald Hedeker,et al.  Longitudinal Data Analysis , 2006 .

[41]  Iana Vassileva,et al.  Increasing energy efficiency in low-income households through targeting awareness and behavioral change , 2014 .

[42]  Peter Morris,et al.  The Effectiveness of Energy Feedback for Conservation and Peak Demand: A Literature Review , 2013 .

[43]  Neil Simcock,et al.  Factors influencing perceptions of domestic energy information: Content, source and process , 2014 .

[44]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Assessing Eco-Feedback Interface Usage and Design to Drive Energy Efficiency in Buildings , 2012 .

[45]  Will Gans,et al.  Smart Meter Devices and the Effect of Feedback on Residential Electricity Consumption: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Northern Ireland , 2011 .

[46]  Volker Wulf,et al.  What People Do with Consumption Feedback: A Long-Term Living Lab Study of a Home Energy Management System , 2015, Interact. Comput..

[47]  Nicholas W. Taylor,et al.  Targeting utility customers to improve energy savings from conservation and efficiency programs , 2014 .

[48]  William J. Kaiser,et al.  Real-time, appliance-level electricity use feedback system: How to engage users? , 2014 .

[49]  W. H. Engelmann,et al.  The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants , 2001, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[50]  H. Bozdogan.  Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions , 1987 .

[51]  A. Carrico,et al.  Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: An evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education , 2011 .

[52]  John E. Taylor,et al.  Investigating the impact eco-feedback information representation has on building occupant energy consumption behavior and savings , 2013 .

[53]  Josep Espluga,et al.  A qualitative study of users' engagement with real-time feedback from in-house energy consumption displays , 2013 .

[54]  J. Quigley,et al.  Residential energy use and conservation: Economics and demographics , 2012 .