On maintaining pressure equilibrium between a soil CO2 flux chamber and the ambient air

[1] Pressure equilibrium between inside a soil CO2 flux chamber and the surrounding air outside the chamber must be maintained during a measurement if measured soil CO2 flux (FCO2) is to accurately represent the rate occurring naturally outside the chamber. In previous studies a simple vent tube connecting to the chamber has often been used to maintain pressure equilibrium. This approach, however, can be effective only under calm conditions. Under windy conditions, negative pressure excursions will occur inside the chamber that are artifacts resulting from wind passing over the vent tube's external open end, a phenomenon known as the Venturi effect. This causes anomalous mass flow of CO2-rich air from the soil into the chamber, leading to a significant overestimation of FCO2. In this present study, we found that negative chamber pressure excursions due to the Venturi effect cannot be observed unless the differential pressure measurement is made with the chamber resting on an impermeable base. Making pressure measurements with a chamber resting on porous soil can lead to the erroneous conclusion that an anomalous mass flow is not a problem precisely when it is causing serious artifacts. We also present a new vent design for a soil CO2 flux chamber capable of maintaining pressure equilibrium between inside the chamber and the ambient air outside the chamber under both calm and windy conditions. Differential pressure measurements from field experiments show that the pressures inside our newly designed vented chamber equal those outside the chamber when wind speed at a height of 0.5 m is up to 7 m s−1, thus virtually eliminating artifacts due to the Venturi effect. Our field data show that the problem of overestimation in measured FCO2 by a chamber with older vent designs under windy conditions can be avoided with our newly designed vented chamber.

[1]  A. D. Young,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics , 1968 .

[2]  E. R. Lemon,et al.  Spectra of air pressure fluctuations at the soil surface , 1970 .

[3]  B. Kimball,et al.  Air Turbulence Effects upon Soil Gas Exchange1 , 1971 .

[4]  E. R. Lemon,et al.  Theory of soil air movement due to pressure fluctuations , 1971 .

[5]  W. L. Powers,et al.  FIELD CHAMBER MEASUREMENTS OF CO2 FLUX FROM SOIL SURFACE , 1974 .

[6]  G. Campbell,et al.  An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics , 1977 .

[7]  D. Focht,et al.  Direct In-field Measurement of Nitrous Oxide Flux from Soils1 , 1978 .

[8]  O. Denmead Chamber Systems for Measuring Nitrous Oxide Emission from Soils in the Field , 1979 .

[9]  G. L. Hutchinson,et al.  Improved Soil Cover Method for Field Measurement of Nitrous Oxide Fluxes , 1981 .

[10]  B. Kimball Canopy Gas Exchange: Gas Exchange with Soil , 1983 .

[11]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Trace gas exchange above the floor of a deciduous forest: 1. Evaporation and CO2 efflux , 1991 .

[12]  J. M. Norman,et al.  Soil surface CO2 fluxes and the carbon budget of a grassland , 1992 .

[13]  Friedrich Beese,et al.  Seasonal variation of N2O and CH4 fluxes in differently managed arable soils in southern Germany , 1995 .

[14]  D. F. Young,et al.  A Brief Introduction to Fluid Mechanics , 1996 .

[15]  J. Moncrieff,et al.  An improved dynamic chamber technique for measuring CO2 efflux from the surface of soil , 1996 .

[16]  Richard W. Healy,et al.  Numerical Evaluation of Static‐Chamber Measurements of Soil—Atmosphere Gas Exchange: Identification of Physical Processes , 1996 .

[17]  John M. Norman,et al.  A comparison of six methods for measuring soil‐surface carbon dioxide fluxes , 1997 .

[18]  Paul G. Jarvis,et al.  An improved open chamber system for measuring soil CO2 effluxes in the field , 1997 .

[19]  W. Massman,et al.  A model investigation of turbulence‐driven pressure‐pumping effects on the rate of diffusion of CO2, N2O, and CH4 through layered snowpacks , 1997 .

[20]  S. Yates,et al.  Laboratory study of closed and dynamic flux chambers : Experimental results and implications for field application , 1998 .

[21]  Scott R. Yates,et al.  Simulation of enclosure‐based methods for measuring gas emissions from soil to the atmosphere , 1998 .

[22]  Keith A. Smith,et al.  A re‐examination of closed flux chamber methods for the measurement of trace gas emissions from soils to the atmosphere , 1998 .

[23]  J. Moncrieff,et al.  An open-top chamber for measuring soil respiration and the influence of pressure difference on CO2 efflux measurement , 1998 .

[24]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  The effects of chamber pressurization on soil‐surface CO2 flux and the implications for NEE measurements under elevated CO2 , 1999 .

[25]  M. Aubinet,et al.  Soil CO2 efflux measurements in a mixed forest: impact of chamber disturbances, spatial variability and seasonal evolution , 2000 .

[26]  W. Kutsch,et al.  Field measurements of root respiration and total soil respiration in an alder forest , 2001 .

[27]  G. L. Hutchinson,et al.  Vents and seals in non‐steady‐state chambers used for measuring gas exchange between soil and the atmosphere , 2001 .

[28]  J. Welles,et al.  Considerations for measuring ground CO2 effluxes with chambers , 2001 .

[29]  B. Law,et al.  Contrasting soil respiration in young and old‐growth ponderosa pine forests , 2002 .

[30]  Eric A. Davidson,et al.  Minimizing artifacts and biases in chamber-based measurements of soil respiration , 2002 .

[31]  J. Riggs,et al.  Automated monitoring of soil respiration: A moving chamber design , 2003 .

[32]  Eric A Davidson,et al.  A comparison of manual and automated systems for soil CO2 flux measurements: trade-offs between spatial and temporal resolution. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[33]  A. Lindroth,et al.  A Calibration System for Soil Carbon Dioxide‐Efflux Measurement Chambers , 2003 .

[34]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Explaining temporal variation in soil CO2 efflux in a mature spruce forest in Southern Germany , 2003 .

[35]  G. Katul,et al.  Reduction of forest floor respiration by fertilization on both carbon dioxide-enriched and reference 17-year-old loblolly pine stands , 2003 .

[36]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Meiotic cytology and chromosome behaviour in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[37]  Jianwu Tang,et al.  How soil moisture, rain pulses, and growth alter the response of ecosystem respiration to temperature , 2004 .

[38]  William J. Massman,et al.  Influence of high-frequency ambient pressure pumping on carbon dioxide efflux from soil , 2004 .

[39]  Lucy R. Hutyra,et al.  Wind-induced error in the measurement of soil respiration using closed dynamic chambers , 2005 .