The intelligent knee sleeve: a wearable biofeedback device

Abstract A unique textile-based device, the intelligent knee sleeve (IKS), uses conducting polymer technology to provide feedback on knee flexion angle for injury prevention programs. After identifying the most appropriate base fabric for the sensor, 12 athletes (age = 26.1 ± 3.2 years) performed four landing movements while wearing the sleeve, which was set to provide audible feedback at 25° and 45° knee flexion. Sensor and audible output (1000 Hz), knee kinematics (200 Hz) and ground reaction forces (1000 Hz) were recorded during the landing movements using an OPTO TRAK ® motion analysis system. Paired t -tests and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to determine validity and reliability of the feedback. The results revealed that the audible feedback tone was able to significantly differentiate between different goniometer-programmed knee angles (25° and 45°). Knee angles computed using the kinematic data from each trial for each movement were also highly reliable (intraclass correlation coefficients, R 1  = 0.903–0.988). It was concluded that although the IKS provides valid and reliable feedback on knee flexion angle, consistent feedback is dependent upon use of a sensor unaffected by environmental conditions. Such wearable biofeedback systems have application in a broad spectrum of activities, including performance enhancement, injury prevention and rehabilitation.

[1]  F. Noyes,et al.  The symptomatic anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Part I: the long-term functional disability in athletically active individuals. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  W. Vincent Statistics In Kinesiology , 1994 .

[3]  Rich Fletcher Force Transduction Materials for Human-Technology Interfaces , 1996, IBM Syst. J..

[4]  R. Warren,et al.  The Effect of Joint-Compressive Load and Quadriceps Muscle Force on Knee Motion in the Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Sectioned Knee , 1994, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  D. Rossi,et al.  Dressware: wearable hardware , 1999 .

[6]  Bing Yu,et al.  Instruction of Jump-Landing Technique Using Videotape Feedback , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  C. Enwemeka,et al.  Radiographic verification of knee goniometry. , 1986, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[8]  L. Draganich,et al.  An in vitro study of anterior cruciate ligament strain induced by quadriceps and hamstrings forces , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  Todd A Kuiken,et al.  Computerized biofeedback knee goniometer: acceptance and effect on exercise behavior in post-total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  M G Pandy,et al.  Dependence of cruciate-ligament loading on muscle forces and external load. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  R. J. Sullivan,et al.  Augmented feedback reduces jump landing forces. , 2001, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[12]  A. Caraffa,et al.  Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer , 1996, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[13]  J. Steele,et al.  Effect of verbal instructions on muscle activity and risk of injury to the anterior cruciate ligament during landing , 2003, British journal of sports medicine.

[14]  F. Noyes,et al.  The Effect of Neuromuscular Training on the Incidence of Knee Injury in Female Athletes , 1999, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  F R Noyes,et al.  Plyometric Training in Female Athletes , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.