Who, what, why? An exploration of JoVE scientific video publications in tweets

This paper investigates how and why scientific video articles are communicated on Twitter. We use video articles published in the Journal of Visualized Experiments (JoVE) as our objects of study. We harvested tweets from October 2011 to November 2015 that contained one or more JoVE links. These tweets “citing” JoVE articles were analyzed both statistically and qualitatively. In this paper, we present the distribution of these tweets, with a closer look at the affordance use of Twitter including hashtags and mentions. In addition, we conducted a content analysis of the sampled Twitter accounts and tweets. We present the coding schemes and results of both Twitter user accounts and tweets text. In addition to the analysis of the coding results, we discuss the content of the tweets with particular attention to issues including the video/visual feature mentioned, the role of Twitter bots, and self-promotion of different stakeholders in the Twitter communication of JoVE video publications.

[1]  A. Franz,et al.  Organic Chemistry YouTube Writing Assignment for Large Lecture Classes , 2012 .

[2]  Pep Simo,et al.  Low-Cost educational videos' for engineering students: a new concept based on video streaming and Youtube channels , 2011 .

[3]  Rodrigo Costas Identifying Twitter audiences: who is tweeting about scientific papers? , 2015 .

[4]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The role of online videos in research communication: A content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Christopher Cayari The YouTube Effect: How YouTube Has Provided New Ways to Consume, Create, and Share Music , 2011 .

[6]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication , 2014, Scientometrics.

[7]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated “bot” accounts on Twitter , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Isabella Peters,et al.  Astrophysicists’ Conversational Connections on Twitter , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  S. Haustein,et al.  Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  Shenmeng Xu,et al.  Global science discussed in local altmetrics: Weibo and its comparison with Twitter , 2017, J. Informetrics.

[11]  A. Bleckmann,et al.  YouTube, dentistry, and dental education. , 2011, Journal of dental education.

[12]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  Shenmeng Xu,et al.  Communicating Scientific Video Articles on Twitter: An Initial Exploration of JoVE Publications , 2017, ISSI.

[14]  Troy Jones,et al.  YouTube: Educational Potentials and Pitfalls , 2011 .

[15]  Richard Van Noorden Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network , 2014, Nature.

[16]  Kim Holmberg,et al.  Highly tweeted science articles: who tweets them? An analysis of Twitter user profile descriptions , 2017, Scientometrics.

[17]  A. Clifton,et al.  Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning? , 2011, Nurse education today.

[18]  Jason Priem,et al.  How and why scholars cite on Twitter , 2010, ASIST.

[19]  Ali Ghazinejad,et al.  Who Tweets about Science? , 2015, ISSI.

[20]  Kim Holmberg,et al.  Communicating diabetes and diets on Twitter - a semantic content analysis , 2016, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[21]  Matias Pasquali,et al.  Video in science , 2007, EMBO reports.

[22]  Balakrishnan Muniandy,et al.  Views of Pre service Teachers in Utilizing Online Video Clips for Teaching English Language , 2011 .

[23]  Autar Kaw,et al.  Development and Assessment of Digital Audiovisual Youtube Lectures for an Engineering Course in Numerical Methods , 2011 .