Impact of Selective Mapping Strategies on Automated Laboratory Result Notification to Public Health Authorities

Automated electronic laboratory reporting (ELR) for public health has many potential advantages, but requires mapping local laboratory test codes to a standard vocabulary such as LOINC. Mapping only the most frequently reported tests provides one way to prioritize the effort and mitigate the resource burden. We evaluated the implications of selective mapping on ELR for public health by comparing reportable conditions from an operational ELR system with the codes in the LOINC Top 2000. Laboratory result codes in the LOINC Top 2000 accounted for 65.3% of the reportable condition volume. However, by also including the 129 most frequent LOINC codes that identified reportable conditions in our system but were not present in the LOINC Top 2000, this set would cover 98% of the reportable condition volume. Our study highlights the ways that our approach to implementing vocabulary standards impacts secondary data uses such as public health reporting.

[1]  Daniel J. Vreeman,et al.  Embracing Change in a Health Information Exchange , 2008, AMIA.

[2]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  How Disease Surveillance Systems Can Serve as Practical Building Blocks for a Health Information Infrastructure: the Indiana Experience , 2005, AMIA.

[3]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  A comparison of the completeness and timeliness of automated electronic laboratory reporting and spontaneous reporting of notifiable conditions. , 2008, American journal of public health.

[4]  Lonnie Blevins,et al.  The Indiana network for patient care: a working local health information infrastructure. An example of a working infrastructure collaboration that links data from five health systems and hundreds of millions of entries. , 2005, Health affairs.

[5]  Julie J McGowan,et al.  Electronic laboratory data quality and the value of a health information exchange to support public health reporting processes. , 2011, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[6]  C. McDonald,et al.  Logical observation identifier names and codes (LOINC) database: a public use set of codes and names for electronic reporting of clinical laboratory test results. , 1996, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  Daniel J. Vreeman,et al.  A Rationale for Parsimonious Laboratory Term Mapping by Frequency , 2007, AMIA.

[8]  R. Vogt.  Laboratory reporting and disease surveillance. , 1996, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[9]  P. Effler,et al.  Statewide system of electronic notifiable disease reporting from clinical laboratories: comparing automated reporting with conventional methods. , 1999, JAMA.

[10]  Ming-Chin Lin,et al.  Correctness of Voluntary LOINC Mapping for Laboratory Tests in Three Large Institutions. , 2010, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[11]  R. Berkelman,et al.  A review of strategies for enhancing the completeness of notifiable disease reporting. , 2005, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[12]  Shaun J Grannis,et al.  The Indiana network for patient care: an integrated clinical information system informed by over thirty years of experience. , 2004, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[13]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Electronic laboratory reporting for the infectious diseases physician and clinical microbiologist. , 2005, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[14]  James J. Cimino,et al.  Combining laboratory data sets from multiple institutions using the logical observation identifier names and codes (LOINC) , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.