Influence of Sex on Relationship Between Total Anatomical and Physiologic Disease Burdens and Their Prognostic Implications in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
暂无分享,去创建一个
T. Akasaka | N. Tanaka | K. Choi | J. M. Lee | Jin‐Ho Choi | B. Koo | J. Doh | Shaoliang Chen | C. Nam | E. Shin | H. Matsuo | Jonghanne Park | Seo-Young Lee | Jinlong Zhang | C. H. Kim | D. Hwang | T. Rhee | You-jung Choi | S. Kuramitsu | Jianan Wang | J. Lee | Jonghanne Park
[1] Charles A. Taylor,et al. Identification of High-Risk Plaques Destined to Cause Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography and Computational Fluid Dynamics. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[2] Jiyan Chen,et al. Clinical implications of three-vessel fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with coronary artery disease , 2018, European heart journal.
[3] J. M. Lee,et al. Functional Approach for Coronary Artery Disease: Filling the Gap Between Evidence and Practice , 2018, Korean circulation journal.
[4] T. Akasaka,et al. Prognostic Implication of Functional Incomplete Revascularization and Residual Functional SYNTAX Score in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[5] Jiyan Chen,et al. Clinical Relevance of Functionally Insignificant Moderate Coronary Artery Stenosis Assessed by 3‐Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.
[6] Sunil V. Rao,et al. Sex‐related differences in outcomes among men and women under 55 years of age with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from the PROMETHEUS study , 2017, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[7] P. Austin,et al. Outcomes of Women and Men With Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With and Without Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization , 2017, Journal of the American Heart Association.
[8] Jin-Ho Choi,et al. Physiological Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis Depends on the Amount of Myocardial Mass Subtended by the Coronary Artery. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[9] J. Leipsic,et al. Association of Coronary Stenosis and Plaque Morphology With Fractional Flow Reserve and Outcomes. , 2016, JAMA cardiology.
[10] Susan Cheng,et al. Sex differences in cardiovascular ageing , 2016, Heart.
[11] L. Klein,et al. Fractional Flow Reserve: Physiological Basis, Advantages and Limitations, and Potential Gender Differences , 2015, Current cardiology reviews.
[12] William Wijns,et al. Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. , 2014, European heart journal.
[13] M. Mack,et al. Quantification of Incomplete Revascularization and its Association With Five-Year Mortality in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) Trial Validation of the Residual SYNTAX Score , 2013, Circulation.
[14] Seung‐Jung Park,et al. Sex differences in the visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound versus fractional flow reserve. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[15] J. Tremmel,et al. The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) substudy. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[16] Nikola Jagic,et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.
[17] P. Serruys,et al. Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyQuantification and Impact of Untreated Coronary Artery Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) Score , 2012 .
[18] Erik Jørgensen,et al. Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. , 2012, European heart journal.
[19] Mouaz Al-Mallah,et al. Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without know , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[20] Akiko Maehara,et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.
[21] F. Eberli,et al. Value of the SYNTAX score for risk assessment in the all-comers population of the randomized multicenter LEADERS (Limus Eluted from A Durable versus ERodable Stent coating) trial. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[22] U. Siebert,et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.
[23] M. Mack,et al. Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[24] William Wijns,et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[25] D. Berman,et al. Comparison of the Short‐Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography , 2003, Circulation.
[26] K. Gould,et al. Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses: theoretical basis and animal validation. , 2000, Circulation.
[27] E. Topol,et al. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. , 1995, Circulation.
[28] S. Kelsey,et al. Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in women. 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Coronary Angioplasty Registry. , 1993, Circulation.
[29] Helmut Baumgartner,et al. ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization , 2014 .
[30] P. Kolh,et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Ca , 2014, European heart journal.
[31] Alan S. Brown,et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.