Influence of Sex on Relationship Between Total Anatomical and Physiologic Disease Burdens and Their Prognostic Implications in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Background Total atherosclerosis disease burden is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. However, the influence of sex on the relationship between total anatomical and physiologic disease burdens and their prognostic implications have not been well defined. Methods and Results A total of 1136 patients who underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement in all 3 major coronary arteries were included in this study. Anatomical and physiologic total disease burden was assessed by SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score, residual SYNTAX score, a total sum of FFR in 3 vessels (3‐vessel FFR), and functional SYNTAX score. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia‐driven revascularization at 2 years. There were no differences in angiographic diameter stenosis, SYNTAX score, or residual SYNTAX score between women and men. However, both per‐vessel FFR (0.89±0.10 versus 0.87±0.11, P<0.001) and 3‐vessel FFR (2.72±0.13 versus 2.69±0.15, P<0.001) were higher in women. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that total anatomical and physiologic disease burdens were significantly associated with 2‐year major adverse cardiac events, and there was no significant interaction between sex and total disease burden for clinical outcomes. Conclusions Despite similar angiographic disease severity, both per‐vessel and per‐patient physiologic disease severity was less in women than in men. There was no influence of sex on prognostic implications of total anatomical and physiologic disease burdens in patients with coronary artery disease. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01621438.

[1]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Identification of High-Risk Plaques Destined to Cause Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography and Computational Fluid Dynamics. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  Jiyan Chen,et al.  Clinical implications of three-vessel fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with coronary artery disease , 2018, European heart journal.

[3]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Functional Approach for Coronary Artery Disease: Filling the Gap Between Evidence and Practice , 2018, Korean circulation journal.

[4]  T. Akasaka,et al.  Prognostic Implication of Functional Incomplete Revascularization and Residual Functional SYNTAX Score in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  Jiyan Chen,et al.  Clinical Relevance of Functionally Insignificant Moderate Coronary Artery Stenosis Assessed by 3‐Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[6]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Sex‐related differences in outcomes among men and women under 55 years of age with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from the PROMETHEUS study , 2017, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[7]  P. Austin,et al.  Outcomes of Women and Men With Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With and Without Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization , 2017, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[8]  Jin-Ho Choi,et al.  Physiological Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis Depends on the Amount of Myocardial Mass Subtended by the Coronary Artery. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Association of Coronary Stenosis and Plaque Morphology With Fractional Flow Reserve and Outcomes. , 2016, JAMA cardiology.

[10]  Susan Cheng,et al.  Sex differences in cardiovascular ageing , 2016, Heart.

[11]  L. Klein,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve: Physiological Basis, Advantages and Limitations, and Potential Gender Differences , 2015, Current cardiology reviews.

[12]  William Wijns,et al.  Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. , 2014, European heart journal.

[13]  M. Mack,et al.  Quantification of Incomplete Revascularization and its Association With Five-Year Mortality in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) Trial Validation of the Residual SYNTAX Score , 2013, Circulation.

[14]  Seung‐Jung Park,et al.  Sex differences in the visual-functional mismatch between coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound versus fractional flow reserve. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  J. Tremmel,et al.  The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) substudy. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[16]  Nikola Jagic,et al.  Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyQuantification and Impact of Untreated Coronary Artery Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) Score , 2012 .

[18]  Erik Jørgensen,et al.  Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. , 2012, European heart journal.

[19]  Mouaz Al-Mallah,et al.  Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without know , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Akiko Maehara,et al.  A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  F. Eberli,et al.  Value of the SYNTAX score for risk assessment in the all-comers population of the randomized multicenter LEADERS (Limus Eluted from A Durable versus ERodable Stent coating) trial. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  M. Mack,et al.  Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[24]  William Wijns,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  D. Berman,et al.  Comparison of the Short‐Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography , 2003, Circulation.

[26]  K. Gould,et al.  Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses: theoretical basis and animal validation. , 2000, Circulation.

[27]  E. Topol,et al.  Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. , 1995, Circulation.

[28]  S. Kelsey,et al.  Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in women. 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Coronary Angioplasty Registry. , 1993, Circulation.

[29]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization , 2014 .

[30]  P. Kolh,et al.  2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Ca , 2014, European heart journal.

[31]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.