Evaluation of a Structured Treatment and Teaching Program for Non-Insulin-Treated Type II Diabetic Outpatients in Germany After the Nationwide Introduction of Reimbursement Policy for Physicians

Objective— To evaluate the practicability and efficacy of a structured treatment and teaching program for non-insulin-treated type II diabetic patients in routine primary health care. Research Design and Methods— All physicians (n = 139) and their office staffs in Hamburg, Germany, who had participated in a special training course from 1 April 1991 to 31 December 1991 were contacted for a standardized interview. A random sample of 17 of these offices was selected for office visits during which the documented data of all patients who had received the standardized treatment and teaching in the same period were collected and evaluated. Results— The program was well received by the physicians, and the data collected on 179 patients (5.1 mo median after the intervention) demonstrated the efficacy of the program at the treatment level: reduction of body weight (mean 2.8 kg, P < 0.0001) and HbA1c levels (from 8.11 ± 1.68 to 7.47 ± 1.64%, P < 0.0001) was substantial. The individual prescribed volume of oral antidiabetic agents was ∼50% lower after patient attendance of the program (significant decrease from 1.41 ± 1.42 to 0.76 ± 1.11 tablets/patient/day, P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients treated with oral antidiabetic drugs decreased from 63 to 42% (P < 0.0001). Conclusions— Subsequent to the introduction of nationwide remuneration of outpatient education for type II diabetic patients by office-based physicians, a relevant improvement was observed in the quality of care, comparable with the effects of the program in a previous prospective controlled trial.

[1]  G. Reiber,et al.  Pathways to Diabetic Limb Amputation: Basis for Prevention , 1990, Diabetes Care.

[2]  E. D. Bransome Improving the Financing of Diabetes Care in the 1990s: Recommendations of the 1989 Conference , 1992, Diabetes Care.

[3]  T. O'dowd,et al.  Diabetes care: whose responsibility? , 1984 .

[4]  P Sinnock,et al.  The Epidemiology of Lower Extremity Amputations in Diabetic Individuals , 1983, Diabetes Care.

[5]  L. Simons,et al.  Impact of Intensive Educational Approach to Dietary Change in NIDDM , 1990, Diabetes Care.

[6]  M. Holland,et al.  Metabolic control of diabetes in general practice clinics: comparison with a hospital clinic. , 1984, British medical journal.

[7]  K. Meadows,et al.  Knowledge of Diabetes in Asians and Europeans With and Without Diabetes: The Coventry Diabetes Study , 1991, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[8]  G A Colditz,et al.  The economic costs of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1989, JAMA.

[9]  L. V. Miller,et al.  More efficient care of diabetic patients in a county-hospital setting. , 1972, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Diabetes Care and Research in Europe: The Saint Vincent Declaration , 1990, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[11]  J. Assal,et al.  The Tuning Fork Revisited , 1990, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[12]  E. Jutzi,et al.  Trends in mortality rates in the diabetic population of the GDR. , 2009, Experimental and clinical endocrinology.

[13]  M. Steffes,et al.  Toward a basic understanding of diabetic complications. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Pirart Diabetes Mellitus and Its Degenerative Complications: A Prospective Study of 4,400 Patients Observed Between 1947 and 1973 , 1978, Diabetes Care.

[15]  Richard Barnett,et al.  Diabetes mellitus. , 1993, The Medical journal of Australia.